A prospective study on clinical profile, severity, microbiology, and outcome of patients with ventilator associated infective complications admitted in intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital

Subhajit Sen, Suresh Ramasubban
{"title":"A prospective study on clinical profile, severity, microbiology, and outcome of patients with ventilator associated infective complications admitted in intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital","authors":"Subhajit Sen, Suresh Ramasubban","doi":"10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Mechanical ventilation epitomizes intensive care medicine. Ventilator‑associated complications are mainly Ventilator associated respiratory infections (VARI); These are a major cause of concern in the intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide, especially in developing countries. VARI includes patients with ventilator‑associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) and ventilator‑associated pneumonia (VAP).The clinical profile, severity, microbiology, and outcomes of such infections is not well described in Eastern India. The primary objective of the study was to study the risk factors, severity scoring, microbiological profile and 28 days outcome of patients admitted in intensive care unit of our hospital.Secondary objective of our study was to find out any correlation between risk factors, severity scoring, microbiological profile, and outcome of patients with VAT and VAP admitted in intensive care unit of our hospital.: This was a prospective observational study done in the ICU of a tertiary care centre in eastern India. A total 50 patients of clinically, microbiologically and/or radiologically diagnosed case of VAP and VAT were included in the study. A structured data collection proforma was prepared and data collection was done. Raw data was tabulated and analysed: 66% of our patients were male, Smoking was the commonest addiction(24%), VARI developed early with 17% on Day 3, 72% developed VARI within 5 days of ventilation. 16% had history of recent admission, Diabetes and hypertension were the commonest comorbidities. 58% of the patients developed VAP, the median SOFA score in VAP was 6 also similar in VAT. Patients with neurological diseases had the maximum number of VAT and VAP. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the commonest organism causing VAT (42%) while Acinetobacter Baumanii was commonest to cause VAP (44%). 51% of VAP patients were on volume control mode, while it was 52% of VAT patients. Most isolates are MDR pathogens with intermediate sensitivity to Polymyxin being most common (66%) 1 isolate was pan resistant. Mortality was 58% for VAP and 19% in VAT. Both Klebsiella and Acinetobacter accounts for 41% death in VAP group, in VAT group Klebsiella was commonest however no statistical significance with other organism.: Gram negative bacteria were the predominant cause of VAT and VAP, Acinetobacter and Klebsiella are the commonest organisms. Most Isolates are MDR with intermediate sensitivity to Polymyxins. Median SOFA scores were the same in both. Mortality was high in VAP group. Volume control mode was predominant mode of ventilation, Neurological causes was predominant cause that leads to ventilation and subsequent VARI.","PeriodicalId":14503,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Mechanical ventilation epitomizes intensive care medicine. Ventilator‑associated complications are mainly Ventilator associated respiratory infections (VARI); These are a major cause of concern in the intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide, especially in developing countries. VARI includes patients with ventilator‑associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) and ventilator‑associated pneumonia (VAP).The clinical profile, severity, microbiology, and outcomes of such infections is not well described in Eastern India. The primary objective of the study was to study the risk factors, severity scoring, microbiological profile and 28 days outcome of patients admitted in intensive care unit of our hospital.Secondary objective of our study was to find out any correlation between risk factors, severity scoring, microbiological profile, and outcome of patients with VAT and VAP admitted in intensive care unit of our hospital.: This was a prospective observational study done in the ICU of a tertiary care centre in eastern India. A total 50 patients of clinically, microbiologically and/or radiologically diagnosed case of VAP and VAT were included in the study. A structured data collection proforma was prepared and data collection was done. Raw data was tabulated and analysed: 66% of our patients were male, Smoking was the commonest addiction(24%), VARI developed early with 17% on Day 3, 72% developed VARI within 5 days of ventilation. 16% had history of recent admission, Diabetes and hypertension were the commonest comorbidities. 58% of the patients developed VAP, the median SOFA score in VAP was 6 also similar in VAT. Patients with neurological diseases had the maximum number of VAT and VAP. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the commonest organism causing VAT (42%) while Acinetobacter Baumanii was commonest to cause VAP (44%). 51% of VAP patients were on volume control mode, while it was 52% of VAT patients. Most isolates are MDR pathogens with intermediate sensitivity to Polymyxin being most common (66%) 1 isolate was pan resistant. Mortality was 58% for VAP and 19% in VAT. Both Klebsiella and Acinetobacter accounts for 41% death in VAP group, in VAT group Klebsiella was commonest however no statistical significance with other organism.: Gram negative bacteria were the predominant cause of VAT and VAP, Acinetobacter and Klebsiella are the commonest organisms. Most Isolates are MDR with intermediate sensitivity to Polymyxins. Median SOFA scores were the same in both. Mortality was high in VAP group. Volume control mode was predominant mode of ventilation, Neurological causes was predominant cause that leads to ventilation and subsequent VARI.
关于一家三级医院重症监护室收治的呼吸机相关感染并发症患者的临床概况、严重程度、微生物学和预后的前瞻性研究
:机械通气是重症监护医学的缩影。呼吸机相关并发症主要是呼吸机相关呼吸道感染(VARI);这是全球重症监护病房(ICU),尤其是发展中国家重症监护病房关注的主要问题。VARI 包括呼吸机相关气管支气管炎(VAT)和呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)患者。在印度东部,对此类感染的临床概况、严重程度、微生物学和结果的描述并不充分。本研究的主要目的是研究本院重症监护室收治的 VAT 和 VAP 患者的风险因素、严重程度评分、微生物学特征和 28 天的预后:这是一项在印度东部一家三级医疗中心重症监护室进行的前瞻性观察研究。共有 50 名经临床、微生物学和/或放射学诊断为 VAP 和 VAT 的患者参与研究。研究人员编制了结构化数据收集表并进行了数据收集。对原始数据进行了制表和分析:66%的患者为男性,吸烟是最常见的嗜好(24%),VARI发生较早,17%在第3天发生,72%在通气5天内发生VARI。16%的患者有近期入院史,糖尿病和高血压是最常见的合并症。58%的患者出现 VAP,VAP 的 SOFA 中位数评分为 6,与 VAT 相似。患有神经系统疾病的患者中患 VAT 和 VAP 的人数最多。肺炎克雷伯菌是导致 VAT 最常见的病菌(42%),而鲍曼不动杆菌是导致 VAP 最常见的病菌(44%)。51% 的 VAP 患者使用容量控制模式,而 52% 的 VAT 患者使用容量控制模式。大多数分离菌株都是耐多药病原体,其中对多粘菌素的中度敏感性最为常见(66%),1 个分离菌株对泛耐药。VAP 死亡率为 58%,VAT 死亡率为 19%。在 VAP 组中,克雷伯氏菌和醋氨梭菌造成的死亡占 41%;在 VAT 组中,克雷伯氏菌最常见,但与其他病菌相比没有统计学意义:革兰氏阴性菌是导致 VAT 和 VAP 的主要病因,其中最常见的细菌是醋杆菌和克雷伯菌。大多数分离菌具有多重耐药性,对多粘菌素具有中等敏感性。两者的 SOFA 中位数评分相同。VAP 组死亡率较高。通气以容量控制模式为主,神经原因是导致通气和随后 VARI 的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信