Comparative study of body fluid cytology using cytocentrifuge and ordinary centrifuge

Madhuri Roy, D. Wakkar
{"title":"Comparative study of body fluid cytology using cytocentrifuge and ordinary centrifuge","authors":"Madhuri Roy, D. Wakkar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detection of numerous bacterial, fungal, or viral illnesses as well as malignancies is aided by the cytologic study of bodily cavity fluids. The focus of this study is on the type of malignant cells, their distribution and preservation of morphology, cell yield, and comparing the outcomes for positive cases.: To assess the utility, sensitivity and compare the results obtained by cytocentrifuge (Pr0Cyt.LED4) with those of conventional centrifuge in cytodiagnosis in Tertiary Care Hospital. A prospective investigation was carried out using ascitic, pleural, cerebrospinal, and other bodily cavity fluid samples that were split equally and centrifuged simultaneously at predetermined parameters in an ordinary centrifuge and a cytocentrifuge.For cytodiagnosis, 100 samples were examined. With a p-value less than 0.05, the results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two approaches. According to this comparison study, the cytocentrifuge preparation outperforms the ordinary centrifuge in terms of cell yield, well-preserved cell morphology, and ability to pick up malignant cells, hence enhancing its sensitivity and improving its diagnostic use.","PeriodicalId":486471,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology","volume":"53 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection of numerous bacterial, fungal, or viral illnesses as well as malignancies is aided by the cytologic study of bodily cavity fluids. The focus of this study is on the type of malignant cells, their distribution and preservation of morphology, cell yield, and comparing the outcomes for positive cases.: To assess the utility, sensitivity and compare the results obtained by cytocentrifuge (Pr0Cyt.LED4) with those of conventional centrifuge in cytodiagnosis in Tertiary Care Hospital. A prospective investigation was carried out using ascitic, pleural, cerebrospinal, and other bodily cavity fluid samples that were split equally and centrifuged simultaneously at predetermined parameters in an ordinary centrifuge and a cytocentrifuge.For cytodiagnosis, 100 samples were examined. With a p-value less than 0.05, the results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two approaches. According to this comparison study, the cytocentrifuge preparation outperforms the ordinary centrifuge in terms of cell yield, well-preserved cell morphology, and ability to pick up malignant cells, hence enhancing its sensitivity and improving its diagnostic use.
使用细胞离心机和普通离心机进行体液细胞学比较研究
体腔液细胞学研究有助于检测多种细菌、真菌或病毒性疾病以及恶性肿瘤。本研究的重点是恶性细胞的类型、分布和形态保存、细胞产量以及阳性病例的结果比较:评估细胞离心机(Pr0Cyt.LED4)在三级医院细胞诊断中的实用性、灵敏度,并与传统离心机的结果进行比较。我们使用腹水、胸水、脑脊液和其他体腔液样本进行了一项前瞻性调查,这些样本被平均分成两份,在普通离心机和细胞离心机中以预定参数同时离心。结果表明,两种方法在统计学上有显著差异,P 值小于 0.05。根据这项比较研究,细胞离心机制备方法在细胞产量、细胞形态的完好保存以及拾取恶性细胞的能力等方面均优于普通离心机,从而提高了其灵敏度,改善了其诊断用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信