Knowledge management in the care for people with intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
M. E. Nägele, K. E. Bevelander, H. L. G. R. Nies, P. J. C. M. Embregts, N. Biervliet, G. L. Leusink, J. Naaldenberg
{"title":"Knowledge management in the care for people with intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"M. E. Nägele,&nbsp;K. E. Bevelander,&nbsp;H. L. G. R. Nies,&nbsp;P. J. C. M. Embregts,&nbsp;N. Biervliet,&nbsp;G. L. Leusink,&nbsp;J. Naaldenberg","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to gain insight into knowledge management in the intellectual disabilities (ID) care sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored and described how knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users experienced knowledge management during this crisis situation, the responses to the specific knowledge needs in the ID-care sector, and changes in roles and collaboration during this period. Twenty-five individual in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users in the Dutch ID-care sector. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Three key themes were identified: (1) knowledge needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) experiences with knowledge management, and (3) roles and collaboration in knowledge management. There was an urgent need for specific ID-related knowledge and how to translate available evidence for the general population into ID-care settings. In knowledge management, the focus was on knowledge production and exchange, with validation and application receiving less attention. Within stakeholder groups, collaboration and knowledge exchange were intensified by existing or new knowledge infrastructures. Between stakeholder groups, knowledge producers and users created short lines to exchange needs and produce knowledge. This paper provides unique insights into knowledge management in the Dutch ID-care sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications are discussed to improve future knowledge management processes. Support with knowledge validation and local knowledge infrastructures (complementary to centralized national knowledge infrastructures) help to assess the reliability and usefulness of knowledge and improve its use in practice during future pandemic-related crisis situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"31 3","pages":"242-260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/kpm.1776","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to gain insight into knowledge management in the intellectual disabilities (ID) care sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored and described how knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users experienced knowledge management during this crisis situation, the responses to the specific knowledge needs in the ID-care sector, and changes in roles and collaboration during this period. Twenty-five individual in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with knowledge producers, intermediaries, and knowledge users in the Dutch ID-care sector. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Three key themes were identified: (1) knowledge needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) experiences with knowledge management, and (3) roles and collaboration in knowledge management. There was an urgent need for specific ID-related knowledge and how to translate available evidence for the general population into ID-care settings. In knowledge management, the focus was on knowledge production and exchange, with validation and application receiving less attention. Within stakeholder groups, collaboration and knowledge exchange were intensified by existing or new knowledge infrastructures. Between stakeholder groups, knowledge producers and users created short lines to exchange needs and produce knowledge. This paper provides unique insights into knowledge management in the Dutch ID-care sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications are discussed to improve future knowledge management processes. Support with knowledge validation and local knowledge infrastructures (complementary to centralized national knowledge infrastructures) help to assess the reliability and usefulness of knowledge and improve its use in practice during future pandemic-related crisis situations.

COVID-19 大流行期间智障人士护理知识管理
本研究旨在深入了解在 COVID-19 大流行期间智障(ID)护理行业的知识管理情况。我们探讨并描述了知识生产者、中间人和知识使用者如何在这一危机情况下体验知识管理、对智障人士护理行业特殊知识需求的回应,以及在此期间角色和协作的变化。我们对荷兰 ID 护理行业的知识生产者、中介和知识使用者进行了 25 次半结构式深入访谈。进行了归纳式主题分析。确定了三个关键主题(1) COVID-19 大流行期间的知识需求,(2) 知识管理经验,以及 (3) 知识管理中的角色与合作。迫切需要与智障者相关的具体知识,以及如何将普通人群的现有证据转化为智障者护理环境。在知识管理方面,重点是知识的生产和交流,而验证和应用则较少受到关注。在利益相关群体内部,现有的或新的知识基础设施加强了合作和知识交流。在利益相关者群体之间,知识生产者和使用者建立了交流需求和生产知识的短线。本文对 COVID-19 大流行期间荷兰 ID 护理行业的知识管理提供了独特的见解。本文还讨论了改进未来知识管理流程的意义。支持知识验证和地方知识基础设施(对集中式国家知识基础设施的补充)有助于评估知识的可靠性和实用性,并在未来与大流行病相关的危机情况下改进知识的实际使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信