Divergence-time estimation in Indo-European

Diachronica Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1075/dia.22031.gol
David Goldstein
{"title":"Divergence-time estimation in Indo-European","authors":"David Goldstein","doi":"10.1075/dia.22031.gol","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Divergence-time estimation is one of the most important endeavors in historical linguistics. Its importance is\n matched only by its difficulty. As Bayesian methods of divergence-time estimation have become more common over the past two\n decades, a number of critical issues have come to the fore, including model sensitivity, the dependence of root-age estimates on\n uncertain interior-node ages, and the relationship between ancient languages and their modern counterparts. This study addresses\n these issues in an investigation of a particularly fraught case within Indo-European: the diversification of Latin into the\n Romance languages. The results of this study support a gradualist account of their formation that most likely began after 300\n  CE. They also bolster the view that Classical Latin is a sampled ancestor of the Romance languages (i.e., it lies\n along the branch leading to the Romance languages).","PeriodicalId":505176,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22031.gol","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Divergence-time estimation is one of the most important endeavors in historical linguistics. Its importance is matched only by its difficulty. As Bayesian methods of divergence-time estimation have become more common over the past two decades, a number of critical issues have come to the fore, including model sensitivity, the dependence of root-age estimates on uncertain interior-node ages, and the relationship between ancient languages and their modern counterparts. This study addresses these issues in an investigation of a particularly fraught case within Indo-European: the diversification of Latin into the Romance languages. The results of this study support a gradualist account of their formation that most likely began after 300  CE. They also bolster the view that Classical Latin is a sampled ancestor of the Romance languages (i.e., it lies along the branch leading to the Romance languages).
印欧语的分化时间估计
发散时间估计是历史语言学中最重要的工作之一。其重要性仅次于其难度。过去二十年来,随着贝叶斯分歧时间估算方法的普及,一些关键问题凸显出来,包括模型的敏感性、根年龄估算对不确定的内部节点年龄的依赖性,以及古代语言与其现代对应语言之间的关系。本研究通过对印欧语系中一个特别棘手的案例--拉丁语系向罗曼语系的分化--的研究,解决了这些问题。研究结果支持对拉丁语的形成进行渐进式的解释,这种解释很可能始于公元 300 年之后。研究结果还支持古典拉丁语是罗曼语祖先的观点(即古典拉丁语位于通往罗曼语的分支上)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信