Who decides ‘what works’, and how does it get implemented? Insights from the UK’s new centre for implementing evidence in adult social care

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Obert Tawodzera, Jon Glasby
{"title":"Who decides ‘what works’, and how does it get implemented? Insights from the UK’s new centre for implementing evidence in adult social care","authors":"Obert Tawodzera, Jon Glasby","doi":"10.1332/23978821y2024d000000034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK’s adult social care system faces severe challenges, including funding shortages, unmet needs and an overburdened workforce. Resultantly, there is a push for high-quality evidence in service enhancement and resource allocation. Using evidence to improve services is essential, but questions arise about best practices for identifying ‘what works’, integrating evidence into everyday practice and addressing resource constraints. Findings from a 2021 UK survey and consultative forums with stakeholders across adult social care underscore concerns about implementing evidence-based practices and highlight the need for increased collaboration to expand the evidence base. These findings shed light on stakeholders’ perspectives regarding factors shaping adult social care practices, opportunities for evidence to play a greater role, definitions of valid evidence and priorities for change. Improved communication and coordination within the sector are crucial to enhance evidence-based decision making, focus limited resources on proven strategies and shape a more effective, evidence-informed adult social care system.","PeriodicalId":43660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care and Caring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care and Caring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/23978821y2024d000000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The UK’s adult social care system faces severe challenges, including funding shortages, unmet needs and an overburdened workforce. Resultantly, there is a push for high-quality evidence in service enhancement and resource allocation. Using evidence to improve services is essential, but questions arise about best practices for identifying ‘what works’, integrating evidence into everyday practice and addressing resource constraints. Findings from a 2021 UK survey and consultative forums with stakeholders across adult social care underscore concerns about implementing evidence-based practices and highlight the need for increased collaboration to expand the evidence base. These findings shed light on stakeholders’ perspectives regarding factors shaping adult social care practices, opportunities for evidence to play a greater role, definitions of valid evidence and priorities for change. Improved communication and coordination within the sector are crucial to enhance evidence-based decision making, focus limited resources on proven strategies and shape a more effective, evidence-informed adult social care system.
谁来决定 "什么有效",如何实施?英国新成立的成人社会护理实证实施中心的见解
英国的成人社会护理系统面临着严峻的挑战,包括资金短缺、需求得不到满足以及劳动力负担过重。因此,在加强服务和资源分配方面,需要推动高质量的证据。利用证据来改善服务至关重要,但在确定 "什么有效"、将证据融入日常实践以及解决资源限制的最佳实践方面也出现了问题。英国 2021 年的一项调查以及与成人社会护理领域的利益相关者举行的咨询论坛所得出的结论,强调了人们对实施循证实践的担忧,并强调了加强合作以扩大循证基础的必要性。这些调查结果阐明了利益相关者对影响成人社会护理实践的因素、证据发挥更大作用的机会、有效证据的定义和变革的优先事项的看法。加强部门内部的沟通和协调,对于强化循证决策、将有限的资源集中用于行之有效的战略以及塑造一个更有效、更有实证依据的成人社会护理体系至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Care and Caring
International Journal of Care and Caring SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信