Artificial intelligence in changing pedagogical design

S. I. Chernykh
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in changing pedagogical design","authors":"S. I. Chernykh","doi":"10.20913/2618-7515-2024-1-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article examines the grounds for changing pedagogical design under the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduced into educational practices. The author, as the main thesis, asserts the idea that the active introduction of AI applications into the educational process leads to a «blurring» of the subjectivity of students and trainees, as well as to the «formation» of AI as a «third subject» in traditional dual educational interaction. Purpose setting. The relevance of considering this problem is associated with the uncertainty of the consequences of the introduction of AI into learning processes, a decrease in the «quality» of an individual’s personal choice, as well as a reduction of the index of his responsibility for this choice.Methodology and methods of the study. The article shows that modern changes in the educational space, both global and Russian, are associated with a number of factors. The change in traditional architecture, the transformation of values and meanings, the universalization of educational standards combined with the individualization of educational trajectories, the active «emigration» to the virtual world – all this differentiates the educational community, destroying its socio-cultural identity.Results. The article emphasizes the position that the impact of AI on changing the entire learning architecture requires not only new didactics, but also fundamentally changes the entire pedagogical design. The reduction of the so-called «routine work» (that is, the one that is easier to algorithmize) – the search for information, the creation of primary textual and visual materials, the «prompt of rational choices» of actual goal-setting and goal-realization (etc.) «replace» many characteristics in the scope of an individual’s subjectivity. This literally detaches learning from upbringing and thereby deprives education of its holistic justification as a platform for its unity.Conclusion. The virtualization of thinking and cognitive potentials determines the obvious inconsistency in the vectors of transformation of educational interactions. If the first vector is aimed at intensifying learning technologies through AI as a «tool», then the second contains conditions for «blurring» the responsibility of educational subjects through its «substitution and shifting» to impersonal subjects-avatars.","PeriodicalId":208354,"journal":{"name":"Professional education in the modern world","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional education in the modern world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2024-1-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the grounds for changing pedagogical design under the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduced into educational practices. The author, as the main thesis, asserts the idea that the active introduction of AI applications into the educational process leads to a «blurring» of the subjectivity of students and trainees, as well as to the «formation» of AI as a «third subject» in traditional dual educational interaction. Purpose setting. The relevance of considering this problem is associated with the uncertainty of the consequences of the introduction of AI into learning processes, a decrease in the «quality» of an individual’s personal choice, as well as a reduction of the index of his responsibility for this choice.Methodology and methods of the study. The article shows that modern changes in the educational space, both global and Russian, are associated with a number of factors. The change in traditional architecture, the transformation of values and meanings, the universalization of educational standards combined with the individualization of educational trajectories, the active «emigration» to the virtual world – all this differentiates the educational community, destroying its socio-cultural identity.Results. The article emphasizes the position that the impact of AI on changing the entire learning architecture requires not only new didactics, but also fundamentally changes the entire pedagogical design. The reduction of the so-called «routine work» (that is, the one that is easier to algorithmize) – the search for information, the creation of primary textual and visual materials, the «prompt of rational choices» of actual goal-setting and goal-realization (etc.) «replace» many characteristics in the scope of an individual’s subjectivity. This literally detaches learning from upbringing and thereby deprives education of its holistic justification as a platform for its unity.Conclusion. The virtualization of thinking and cognitive potentials determines the obvious inconsistency in the vectors of transformation of educational interactions. If the first vector is aimed at intensifying learning technologies through AI as a «tool», then the second contains conditions for «blurring» the responsibility of educational subjects through its «substitution and shifting» to impersonal subjects-avatars.
改变教学设计的人工智能
导言文章探讨了在人工智能(AI)应用引入教育实践的影响下改变教学设计的理由。作为主要论点,作者认为在教育过程中积极引入人工智能应用会导致学生和受训者主体性的 "模糊",以及人工智能作为 "第三主体 "在传统二元教育互动中的 "形成"。目的设定。考虑这一问题的现实意义在于将人工智能引入学习过程的后果的不确定性、个人选择 "质量 "的下降以及个人对这一选择的责任指数的降低。文章指出,全球和俄罗斯教育领域的现代变化与多种因素有关。传统建筑的变化、价值观和意义的转变、教育标准的普遍化与教育轨迹的个性化相结合、向虚拟世界的积极 "移民"--所有这一切都使教育界出现分化,破坏了其社会文化特性。文章强调的立场是,人工智能对改变整个学习架构的影响不仅需要新的教学方法,还需要从根本上改变整个教学设计。减少所谓的 "常规工作"(即更容易算法化的工作)--信息搜索、原始文字和视觉材料的创建、实际目标设定和目标实现的 "理性选择提示"(等等)--"取代 "了个人主观范围内的许多特征。这实际上使学习脱离了教养,从而使教育失去了作为其统一性平台的整体合理性。思维和认知潜能的虚拟化决定了教育互动变革载体的明显不一致。如果说第一个矢量旨在通过人工智能这一 "工具 "强化学习技术,那么第二个矢量则包含了通过 "替代和转移 "非人格主体--虚拟人来 "模糊 "教育主体责任的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信