European Survey on Clinical Practice of Detecting and Treating T-Cell Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection

Priyanka Koshy, L. Furian, Peter Nickerson, G. Zaza, Maria C Haller, Aiko P. J. de Vries, Martin Naesens
{"title":"European Survey on Clinical Practice of Detecting and Treating T-Cell Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection","authors":"Priyanka Koshy, L. Furian, Peter Nickerson, G. Zaza, Maria C Haller, Aiko P. J. de Vries, Martin Naesens","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.12283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The KDIGO guideline for acute rejection treatment recommends use of corticosteroids and suggests using lymphocyte-depleting agents as second line treatment. Aim of the study was to determine the current practices of detection and treatment of TCMR of kidney allografts amongst European kidney transplant centres. An invitation was sent through ESOT/EKITA newsletters and through social media to transplant professionals in Europe for taking part in the survey. A total of 129 transplant professionals responded to the survey. There was equal representation of small and large sized transplant centres. The majority of centres treat borderline changes (BL) and TCMR (Grade IA-B, IIA-B) in indication biopsies and protocol biopsies with corticosteroids as first line treatment. Thymoglobulin is used mainly as second line treatment for TCMR Grade IA-B (80%) and TCMR IIA-B (85%). Treatment success is most often evaluated within one month of therapy. There were no differences observed between the large and small centres for the management of TCMR. This survey highlights the common practices and diversity in clinics for the management of TCMR in Europe. Testing new therapies for TCMR should be in comparison to the current standard of care in Europe. Better consensus on treatment success is crucial for robust study designs.","PeriodicalId":506324,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The KDIGO guideline for acute rejection treatment recommends use of corticosteroids and suggests using lymphocyte-depleting agents as second line treatment. Aim of the study was to determine the current practices of detection and treatment of TCMR of kidney allografts amongst European kidney transplant centres. An invitation was sent through ESOT/EKITA newsletters and through social media to transplant professionals in Europe for taking part in the survey. A total of 129 transplant professionals responded to the survey. There was equal representation of small and large sized transplant centres. The majority of centres treat borderline changes (BL) and TCMR (Grade IA-B, IIA-B) in indication biopsies and protocol biopsies with corticosteroids as first line treatment. Thymoglobulin is used mainly as second line treatment for TCMR Grade IA-B (80%) and TCMR IIA-B (85%). Treatment success is most often evaluated within one month of therapy. There were no differences observed between the large and small centres for the management of TCMR. This survey highlights the common practices and diversity in clinics for the management of TCMR in Europe. Testing new therapies for TCMR should be in comparison to the current standard of care in Europe. Better consensus on treatment success is crucial for robust study designs.
关于检测和治疗 T 细胞介导的肾移植排斥反应临床实践的欧洲调查
KDIGO 急性排斥反应治疗指南建议使用皮质类固醇,并建议使用淋巴细胞清除剂作为二线治疗。该研究的目的是了解欧洲肾移植中心目前检测和治疗肾移植同种异体TCMR的方法。我们通过 ESOT/EKITA 新闻通讯和社交媒体向欧洲的移植专业人员发出了参加调查的邀请。共有 129 名移植专业人员对调查做出了回复。小型和大型移植中心的代表人数相当。大多数中心将皮质类固醇作为一线治疗方法,治疗适应症活检和方案活检中的边界改变(BL)和TCMR(IA-B级、IIA-B级)。胸腺球蛋白主要用于IA-B级(80%)和IIA-B级(85%)TCMR的二线治疗。治疗成功与否通常在治疗后一个月内进行评估。大型中心和小型中心在中医药治疗方面没有差异。这项调查凸显了欧洲诊所在治疗中风后遗症方面的常见做法和多样性。测试中医急症的新疗法时,应与欧洲现行的治疗标准进行比较。就治疗成功与否达成更好的共识对于稳健的研究设计至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信