Perceived causal symptom network of adolescent mental health issues.

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Amanda Bångstad, Judit Fellman, Carl Rosendahl, Martin Bellander, M. Cervin, J. Bjureberg, Lars Klintwall
{"title":"Perceived causal symptom network of adolescent mental health issues.","authors":"Amanda Bångstad, Judit Fellman, Carl Rosendahl, Martin Bellander, M. Cervin, J. Bjureberg, Lars Klintwall","doi":"10.2989/17280583.2023.2283032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescent mental health is difficult to capture in categories such as depression or specific anxiety disorders. An alternative is to approach psychiatric symptoms as causal networks, potentially revealing feedback loops that maintain a pathological state. One approach to creating such networks, implemented in the PECAN methodology, is to ask adolescents about their perceptions of the causes to their symptoms. For this purpose, a transdiagnostic item list was created, and adolescents who screened positive for depression (N = 55) completed twice in two weeks a survey quantifying perceptions of causality between their mental health problems. A network that was averaged across all participants was reliable and revealed three strong feedback loops: a first loop running through stress, insomnia, fatigue, procrastination, and back to stress; a second loop between stress and overthinking; and a third loop between stress and procrastination. Although all adolescents in the study screened positive for depression, symptoms of depression were not particularly central to the network. Instead, the most central symptoms were procrastination and overthinking. The average test-retest reliability for individual networks was low, limiting clinical application. In conclusion, PECAN was found to be reliable and useful when creating a group-level network of adolescent mental health problems. While informative at a group level, the method should be improved before it can be used to inform treatment at the individual level.","PeriodicalId":45290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2023.2283032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescent mental health is difficult to capture in categories such as depression or specific anxiety disorders. An alternative is to approach psychiatric symptoms as causal networks, potentially revealing feedback loops that maintain a pathological state. One approach to creating such networks, implemented in the PECAN methodology, is to ask adolescents about their perceptions of the causes to their symptoms. For this purpose, a transdiagnostic item list was created, and adolescents who screened positive for depression (N = 55) completed twice in two weeks a survey quantifying perceptions of causality between their mental health problems. A network that was averaged across all participants was reliable and revealed three strong feedback loops: a first loop running through stress, insomnia, fatigue, procrastination, and back to stress; a second loop between stress and overthinking; and a third loop between stress and procrastination. Although all adolescents in the study screened positive for depression, symptoms of depression were not particularly central to the network. Instead, the most central symptoms were procrastination and overthinking. The average test-retest reliability for individual networks was low, limiting clinical application. In conclusion, PECAN was found to be reliable and useful when creating a group-level network of adolescent mental health problems. While informative at a group level, the method should be improved before it can be used to inform treatment at the individual level.
青少年心理健康问题的感知因果症状网络。
青少年的心理健康很难被归类为抑郁症或特定的焦虑症。另一种方法是将精神症状视为因果网络,从而揭示维持病理状态的反馈回路。PECAN 方法中采用的一种创建此类网络的方法是询问青少年对其症状成因的看法。为此,我们制作了一份跨诊断项目表,并让抑郁症筛查呈阳性的青少年(55 人)在两周内完成两次调查,量化他们对心理健康问题之间因果关系的看法。所有参与者的平均网络是可靠的,并显示出三个强烈的反馈回路:第一个回路贯穿压力、失眠、疲劳、拖延,然后又回到压力;第二个回路在压力和过度思考之间;第三个回路在压力和拖延之间。虽然研究中所有青少年的抑郁症筛查结果都呈阳性,但抑郁症状在该网络中并不特别重要。相反,最主要的症状是拖延和过度思考。单个网络的平均重测可靠性较低,限制了临床应用。总之,在创建青少年心理健康问题群体网络时,PECAN 被认为是可靠和有用的。虽然该方法在群体层面上具有参考价值,但在用于个人层面的治疗之前,还需要对其进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health publishes papers that contribute to improving the mental health of children and adolescents, especially those in Africa. Papers from all disciplines are welcome. It covers subjects such as epidemiology, mental health prevention and promotion, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, policy and risk behaviour. The journal contains review articles, original research (including brief reports), clinical papers in a "Clinical perspectives" section and book reviews. The Journal is published in association with the South African Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (SAACAPAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信