Amanda Bångstad, Judit Fellman, Carl Rosendahl, Martin Bellander, M. Cervin, J. Bjureberg, Lars Klintwall
{"title":"Perceived causal symptom network of adolescent mental health issues.","authors":"Amanda Bångstad, Judit Fellman, Carl Rosendahl, Martin Bellander, M. Cervin, J. Bjureberg, Lars Klintwall","doi":"10.2989/17280583.2023.2283032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescent mental health is difficult to capture in categories such as depression or specific anxiety disorders. An alternative is to approach psychiatric symptoms as causal networks, potentially revealing feedback loops that maintain a pathological state. One approach to creating such networks, implemented in the PECAN methodology, is to ask adolescents about their perceptions of the causes to their symptoms. For this purpose, a transdiagnostic item list was created, and adolescents who screened positive for depression (N = 55) completed twice in two weeks a survey quantifying perceptions of causality between their mental health problems. A network that was averaged across all participants was reliable and revealed three strong feedback loops: a first loop running through stress, insomnia, fatigue, procrastination, and back to stress; a second loop between stress and overthinking; and a third loop between stress and procrastination. Although all adolescents in the study screened positive for depression, symptoms of depression were not particularly central to the network. Instead, the most central symptoms were procrastination and overthinking. The average test-retest reliability for individual networks was low, limiting clinical application. In conclusion, PECAN was found to be reliable and useful when creating a group-level network of adolescent mental health problems. While informative at a group level, the method should be improved before it can be used to inform treatment at the individual level.","PeriodicalId":45290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2023.2283032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adolescent mental health is difficult to capture in categories such as depression or specific anxiety disorders. An alternative is to approach psychiatric symptoms as causal networks, potentially revealing feedback loops that maintain a pathological state. One approach to creating such networks, implemented in the PECAN methodology, is to ask adolescents about their perceptions of the causes to their symptoms. For this purpose, a transdiagnostic item list was created, and adolescents who screened positive for depression (N = 55) completed twice in two weeks a survey quantifying perceptions of causality between their mental health problems. A network that was averaged across all participants was reliable and revealed three strong feedback loops: a first loop running through stress, insomnia, fatigue, procrastination, and back to stress; a second loop between stress and overthinking; and a third loop between stress and procrastination. Although all adolescents in the study screened positive for depression, symptoms of depression were not particularly central to the network. Instead, the most central symptoms were procrastination and overthinking. The average test-retest reliability for individual networks was low, limiting clinical application. In conclusion, PECAN was found to be reliable and useful when creating a group-level network of adolescent mental health problems. While informative at a group level, the method should be improved before it can be used to inform treatment at the individual level.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health publishes papers that contribute to improving the mental health of children and adolescents, especially those in Africa. Papers from all disciplines are welcome. It covers subjects such as epidemiology, mental health prevention and promotion, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, policy and risk behaviour. The journal contains review articles, original research (including brief reports), clinical papers in a "Clinical perspectives" section and book reviews. The Journal is published in association with the South African Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (SAACAPAP).