Words Matter: Reframing Communication Sciences and Disorders Programs' Thinking About Adolescents

Kristin Nellenbach, Carrie Knight, Bailey Jennings
{"title":"Words Matter: Reframing Communication Sciences and Disorders Programs' Thinking About Adolescents","authors":"Kristin Nellenbach, Carrie Knight, Bailey Jennings","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate language development and disorders course titles across communication sciences and disorders (CSD) graduate programs in an effort to determine whether adolescents were specifically being recognized via inclusive language or dedicated courses. The findings can be used to propel important discussions about the need for inclusive course titles, inform initial directions for improvements in preprofessional education, and guide broader changes in the discipline, especially for the adolescent population.\n \n \n \n A review of accredited CSD graduate programs across the United States was conducted using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association EdFind database. A total of 298 master's-level CSD programs were used for this study. CSD course titles located in each of the university's graduate catalogs were documented, categorized, and reviewed by the research team.\n \n \n \n Of the 298 CSD graduate programs reviewed, one in eight specifically included the word “adolescent(s)” or “adolescence” in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. Remarkably, only four adolescent-focused courses, two of which were listed as electives, were offered across all reviewed programs. A post hoc analysis of the language used in course titling revealed that 42 titles used inclusive terminology.\n \n \n \n Adolescents are developmentally distinct from children, yet a majority of CSD graduate programs used ambiguous or exclusive words in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. The unintentional failure to recognize this important difference in course titles may be contributing to the ongoing neglect of adolescents within the field. Reframing collective thinking is required for change. Reasons and suggestions for including adolescents in course titles and separate offerings are provided to assist CSD graduate programs in leading the way toward improving equity for adolescents.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate language development and disorders course titles across communication sciences and disorders (CSD) graduate programs in an effort to determine whether adolescents were specifically being recognized via inclusive language or dedicated courses. The findings can be used to propel important discussions about the need for inclusive course titles, inform initial directions for improvements in preprofessional education, and guide broader changes in the discipline, especially for the adolescent population. A review of accredited CSD graduate programs across the United States was conducted using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association EdFind database. A total of 298 master's-level CSD programs were used for this study. CSD course titles located in each of the university's graduate catalogs were documented, categorized, and reviewed by the research team. Of the 298 CSD graduate programs reviewed, one in eight specifically included the word “adolescent(s)” or “adolescence” in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. Remarkably, only four adolescent-focused courses, two of which were listed as electives, were offered across all reviewed programs. A post hoc analysis of the language used in course titling revealed that 42 titles used inclusive terminology. Adolescents are developmentally distinct from children, yet a majority of CSD graduate programs used ambiguous or exclusive words in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. The unintentional failure to recognize this important difference in course titles may be contributing to the ongoing neglect of adolescents within the field. Reframing collective thinking is required for change. Reasons and suggestions for including adolescents in course titles and separate offerings are provided to assist CSD graduate programs in leading the way toward improving equity for adolescents.
言语很重要:重构传播科学与障碍课程对青少年的思考
这项调查的目的是评估沟通科学与障碍(CSD)研究生课程中的语言发展与障碍课程名称,以确定青少年是否通过包容性语言或专门课程得到了特别的认可。研究结果可用于推动有关包容性课程名称必要性的重要讨论,为专业预科教育的初步改进方向提供信息,并指导该学科更广泛的变革,尤其是针对青少年群体的变革。 我们利用美国言语-语言-听力协会 EdFind 数据库对全美经认可的 CSD 研究生课程进行了审查。本研究共使用了 298 个 CSD 硕士课程。研究小组对每所大学研究生目录中的 CSD 课程名称进行了记录、分类和审查。 在被审查的 298 个 CSD 研究生项目中,有八分之一的项目在其语言发展与障碍课程的标题中特别注明了 "青少年 "或 "青春期"。值得注意的是,在所有被审查的课程中,只有四门以青少年为重点的课程,其中两门被列为选修课。对课程标题中使用的语言进行事后分析后发现,有 42 个标题使用了包容性术语。 青少年在发育上有别于儿童,但大多数语言发展与障碍研究生项目在其语言发展与障碍课程的标题中使用了含糊不清或排他性的词语。在课程名称中无意中没有认识到这一重要区别,可能会导致该领域对青少年的持续忽视。要想改变这种状况,就必须重塑集体思维。本报告提供了将青少年纳入课程名称和单独课程的原因和建议,以帮助 CSD 研究生课程在改善青少年公平性方面起到带头作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信