Quality and stability of meat products prepared with chicken fillets affected by white striping myopathy

IF 2.701
Denis Fabrício Marchi, Bruna Caroline Geronimo, Daniele Cristina Savoldi, Fernanda Jéssica Mendonça, Margarida Masami Yamaguchi, Gleice Rocha dos Santos Almeida, Adriana Lourenço Soares
{"title":"Quality and stability of meat products prepared with chicken fillets affected by white striping myopathy","authors":"Denis Fabrício Marchi,&nbsp;Bruna Caroline Geronimo,&nbsp;Daniele Cristina Savoldi,&nbsp;Fernanda Jéssica Mendonça,&nbsp;Margarida Masami Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Gleice Rocha dos Santos Almeida,&nbsp;Adriana Lourenço Soares","doi":"10.1007/s13197-024-05979-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the quality and oxidative stability of chicken burger and mortadella prepared with fillets affected by white striping (WS) myopathy as compared with products prepared with normal fillets (control)<i>.</i> There were no differences in pH, L*, or b* between treatments (WS vs. control); however, water holding capacity was higher in control burgers and mortadellas. In burgers, the use of WS fillet led to an increase in lipid content and a reduction in moisture content. Mortadella formulations were similar in terms of proximate composition. Addition of WS fillets did not influenced water activity in any of the products. Differences (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) were observed for texture profile: WS burgers had 35% lower firmness and 32% lower chewiness than control burgers, and WS mortadellas had lower resilience. Cooking yield and shrinkage were similar between WS and control burgers. As for lipid oxidation, it was found that WS burgers were more stable than control formulations. Mortadella formulations showed a similar behavior of lipid oxidation during storage, with higher values observed after 65 days of storage in both treatments. Utilization of WS fillets for the preparation of burgers and mortadellas is a viable alternative that does not compromise product quality or oxidative stability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7010,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13197-024-05979-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the quality and oxidative stability of chicken burger and mortadella prepared with fillets affected by white striping (WS) myopathy as compared with products prepared with normal fillets (control). There were no differences in pH, L*, or b* between treatments (WS vs. control); however, water holding capacity was higher in control burgers and mortadellas. In burgers, the use of WS fillet led to an increase in lipid content and a reduction in moisture content. Mortadella formulations were similar in terms of proximate composition. Addition of WS fillets did not influenced water activity in any of the products. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed for texture profile: WS burgers had 35% lower firmness and 32% lower chewiness than control burgers, and WS mortadellas had lower resilience. Cooking yield and shrinkage were similar between WS and control burgers. As for lipid oxidation, it was found that WS burgers were more stable than control formulations. Mortadella formulations showed a similar behavior of lipid oxidation during storage, with higher values observed after 65 days of storage in both treatments. Utilization of WS fillets for the preparation of burgers and mortadellas is a viable alternative that does not compromise product quality or oxidative stability.

用受白条肌病影响的鸡排制作的肉制品的质量和稳定性
本研究旨在评估用受白条肌病(WS)影响的鸡柳与用正常鸡柳(对照组)制备的鸡肉汉堡和肉酱的质量和氧化稳定性。不同处理(WS 与对照组)之间在 pH 值、L* 或 b* 方面没有差异;但是,对照组汉堡和肉酱的持水量更高。在汉堡中,使用 WS 牛柳会增加脂质含量,降低水分含量。肉冻配方的近似成分相似。添加 WS 牛柳不会影响任何产品的水分活性。在质地方面观察到了差异(p < 0.05):与对照组相比,WS 汉堡的硬度和咀嚼度分别降低了 35% 和 32%,而 WS 肉饼的回弹性较低。WS 和对照组汉堡的烹饪产量和收缩率相似。在脂质氧化方面,WS 汉堡比对照组配方更稳定。肉泥配方在储存过程中的脂质氧化表现相似,两种处理在储存 65 天后观察到的值都较高。利用 WS 鱼片制作汉堡和肉馅糕点是一种可行的替代方法,不会影响产品质量或氧化稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信