Isabelle A Tully, Niki Gumport, J. Tutek, Norah S. Simpson, Lisa Rosas, Donna Zulman, J. Dietch, Rachel Manber
{"title":"1064 Perception of CBTI Treatment Modalities in Older Adults with Insomnia: Comparing Digital and Therapist-led Delivery","authors":"Isabelle A Tully, Niki Gumport, J. Tutek, Norah S. Simpson, Lisa Rosas, Donna Zulman, J. Dietch, Rachel Manber","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n A shortage of trained providers limits access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI). Supplementing traditional in-person, therapist-led CBTI with telehealth delivery and fully automated digital CBTI (dCBTI) can improve accessibility. Characterizing perceived advantages and disadvantages of distinct delivery modalities among patients with insomnia can inform targeted resource allocation and clinical rollout of CBTI. Thus, the current study aims to describe patients’ pre-treatment preferences for therapist-led (in-person and telehealth-delivered) and automated dCBTI, as well as patient-identified advantages and disadvantages of these modalities.\n \n \n \n Participants (N = 80) 50 years and older (M age = 64.2, SD = 7.9; female = 85.2%) were randomly selected from the RESTING Study, an RCT evaluating a triaged stepped-care model for treating insomnia disorder (DSM-5), to undergo a semi-structured interview at baseline, prior to study treatment assignment and exposure. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three raters (inter-rater reliability: 85.0–93.0%). Response themes were identified inductively via qualitative thematic analysis.\n \n \n \n Approximately two-thirds of participants (n = 50, 62.5%) preferred therapist-led CBTI, delivered in-person or via telehealth, over automated dCBTI. The most common participant-identified advantage of dCBTI (n = 55; 68.8%) and telehealth-delivered CBTI (n = 65; 81.3%) was convenience. The most commonly reported disadvantages of dCBTI were limited customizability (n = 39, 38.75%) and lack of human connection (n = 40, 50.0%). However, some participants (n = 13, 16.30%) viewed lack of human connection as an advantage, citing the nonjudgmental nature of online programs and reduced social anxiety/fatigue. The main disadvantage identified for telehealth-delivered CBTi was loss of nonverbal communication (n = 20, 25%).\n \n \n \n While participants identified advantages and disadvantages of both dCBTI and therapist-led CBTI, findings suggest a general preference for therapist-led treatment among middle-aged and older adults. This study is one of the first to examine participant preferences for and perceptions of CBTI delivery modalities prior to receiving study treatment(s). Findings can guide referring providers’ presentation of insomnia intervention options to patients and inform targeted discussions of perceived barriers to treatment. Moreover, results lay a foundation for future research examining the relationship between pre-treatment preferences/perceptions and longitudinal treatment adherence, engagement, and clinical outcomes.\n \n \n \n 1R01AG057500\n","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A shortage of trained providers limits access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI). Supplementing traditional in-person, therapist-led CBTI with telehealth delivery and fully automated digital CBTI (dCBTI) can improve accessibility. Characterizing perceived advantages and disadvantages of distinct delivery modalities among patients with insomnia can inform targeted resource allocation and clinical rollout of CBTI. Thus, the current study aims to describe patients’ pre-treatment preferences for therapist-led (in-person and telehealth-delivered) and automated dCBTI, as well as patient-identified advantages and disadvantages of these modalities.
Participants (N = 80) 50 years and older (M age = 64.2, SD = 7.9; female = 85.2%) were randomly selected from the RESTING Study, an RCT evaluating a triaged stepped-care model for treating insomnia disorder (DSM-5), to undergo a semi-structured interview at baseline, prior to study treatment assignment and exposure. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three raters (inter-rater reliability: 85.0–93.0%). Response themes were identified inductively via qualitative thematic analysis.
Approximately two-thirds of participants (n = 50, 62.5%) preferred therapist-led CBTI, delivered in-person or via telehealth, over automated dCBTI. The most common participant-identified advantage of dCBTI (n = 55; 68.8%) and telehealth-delivered CBTI (n = 65; 81.3%) was convenience. The most commonly reported disadvantages of dCBTI were limited customizability (n = 39, 38.75%) and lack of human connection (n = 40, 50.0%). However, some participants (n = 13, 16.30%) viewed lack of human connection as an advantage, citing the nonjudgmental nature of online programs and reduced social anxiety/fatigue. The main disadvantage identified for telehealth-delivered CBTi was loss of nonverbal communication (n = 20, 25%).
While participants identified advantages and disadvantages of both dCBTI and therapist-led CBTI, findings suggest a general preference for therapist-led treatment among middle-aged and older adults. This study is one of the first to examine participant preferences for and perceptions of CBTI delivery modalities prior to receiving study treatment(s). Findings can guide referring providers’ presentation of insomnia intervention options to patients and inform targeted discussions of perceived barriers to treatment. Moreover, results lay a foundation for future research examining the relationship between pre-treatment preferences/perceptions and longitudinal treatment adherence, engagement, and clinical outcomes.
1R01AG057500
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.