1064 Perception of CBTI Treatment Modalities in Older Adults with Insomnia: Comparing Digital and Therapist-led Delivery

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01064
Isabelle A Tully, Niki Gumport, J. Tutek, Norah S. Simpson, Lisa Rosas, Donna Zulman, J. Dietch, Rachel Manber
{"title":"1064 Perception of CBTI Treatment Modalities in Older Adults with Insomnia: Comparing Digital and Therapist-led Delivery","authors":"Isabelle A Tully, Niki Gumport, J. Tutek, Norah S. Simpson, Lisa Rosas, Donna Zulman, J. Dietch, Rachel Manber","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n A shortage of trained providers limits access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI). Supplementing traditional in-person, therapist-led CBTI with telehealth delivery and fully automated digital CBTI (dCBTI) can improve accessibility. Characterizing perceived advantages and disadvantages of distinct delivery modalities among patients with insomnia can inform targeted resource allocation and clinical rollout of CBTI. Thus, the current study aims to describe patients’ pre-treatment preferences for therapist-led (in-person and telehealth-delivered) and automated dCBTI, as well as patient-identified advantages and disadvantages of these modalities.\n \n \n \n Participants (N = 80) 50 years and older (M age = 64.2, SD = 7.9; female = 85.2%) were randomly selected from the RESTING Study, an RCT evaluating a triaged stepped-care model for treating insomnia disorder (DSM-5), to undergo a semi-structured interview at baseline, prior to study treatment assignment and exposure. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three raters (inter-rater reliability: 85.0–93.0%). Response themes were identified inductively via qualitative thematic analysis.\n \n \n \n Approximately two-thirds of participants (n = 50, 62.5%) preferred therapist-led CBTI, delivered in-person or via telehealth, over automated dCBTI. The most common participant-identified advantage of dCBTI (n = 55; 68.8%) and telehealth-delivered CBTI (n = 65; 81.3%) was convenience. The most commonly reported disadvantages of dCBTI were limited customizability (n = 39, 38.75%) and lack of human connection (n = 40, 50.0%). However, some participants (n = 13, 16.30%) viewed lack of human connection as an advantage, citing the nonjudgmental nature of online programs and reduced social anxiety/fatigue. The main disadvantage identified for telehealth-delivered CBTi was loss of nonverbal communication (n = 20, 25%).\n \n \n \n While participants identified advantages and disadvantages of both dCBTI and therapist-led CBTI, findings suggest a general preference for therapist-led treatment among middle-aged and older adults. This study is one of the first to examine participant preferences for and perceptions of CBTI delivery modalities prior to receiving study treatment(s). Findings can guide referring providers’ presentation of insomnia intervention options to patients and inform targeted discussions of perceived barriers to treatment. Moreover, results lay a foundation for future research examining the relationship between pre-treatment preferences/perceptions and longitudinal treatment adherence, engagement, and clinical outcomes.\n \n \n \n 1R01AG057500\n","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A shortage of trained providers limits access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI). Supplementing traditional in-person, therapist-led CBTI with telehealth delivery and fully automated digital CBTI (dCBTI) can improve accessibility. Characterizing perceived advantages and disadvantages of distinct delivery modalities among patients with insomnia can inform targeted resource allocation and clinical rollout of CBTI. Thus, the current study aims to describe patients’ pre-treatment preferences for therapist-led (in-person and telehealth-delivered) and automated dCBTI, as well as patient-identified advantages and disadvantages of these modalities. Participants (N = 80) 50 years and older (M age = 64.2, SD = 7.9; female = 85.2%) were randomly selected from the RESTING Study, an RCT evaluating a triaged stepped-care model for treating insomnia disorder (DSM-5), to undergo a semi-structured interview at baseline, prior to study treatment assignment and exposure. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by three raters (inter-rater reliability: 85.0–93.0%). Response themes were identified inductively via qualitative thematic analysis. Approximately two-thirds of participants (n = 50, 62.5%) preferred therapist-led CBTI, delivered in-person or via telehealth, over automated dCBTI. The most common participant-identified advantage of dCBTI (n = 55; 68.8%) and telehealth-delivered CBTI (n = 65; 81.3%) was convenience. The most commonly reported disadvantages of dCBTI were limited customizability (n = 39, 38.75%) and lack of human connection (n = 40, 50.0%). However, some participants (n = 13, 16.30%) viewed lack of human connection as an advantage, citing the nonjudgmental nature of online programs and reduced social anxiety/fatigue. The main disadvantage identified for telehealth-delivered CBTi was loss of nonverbal communication (n = 20, 25%). While participants identified advantages and disadvantages of both dCBTI and therapist-led CBTI, findings suggest a general preference for therapist-led treatment among middle-aged and older adults. This study is one of the first to examine participant preferences for and perceptions of CBTI delivery modalities prior to receiving study treatment(s). Findings can guide referring providers’ presentation of insomnia intervention options to patients and inform targeted discussions of perceived barriers to treatment. Moreover, results lay a foundation for future research examining the relationship between pre-treatment preferences/perceptions and longitudinal treatment adherence, engagement, and clinical outcomes. 1R01AG057500
1064 失眠老年人对 CBTI 治疗模式的感知:数字疗法与治疗师主导疗法的比较
训练有素的医疗服务提供者的短缺限制了失眠认知行为疗法(CBTI)的普及。通过远程医疗和全自动数字 CBTI(dCBTI)来补充传统的面对面、由治疗师主导的 CBTI,可以提高治疗的可及性。了解失眠症患者对不同治疗模式的优缺点的看法,可以为有针对性的资源分配和 CBTI 的临床推广提供依据。因此,本研究旨在描述患者在治疗前对治疗师指导(面对面和远程医疗提供)和自动化 dCBTI 的偏好,以及患者对这些模式优缺点的认知。 参与者(N = 80)年龄在 50 岁及以上(中位年龄 = 64.2,SD = 7.9;女性 = 85.2%),从 RESTING 研究(一项评估治疗失眠症(DSM-5)的分诊阶梯护理模式的 RCT 研究)中随机抽取,在基线时接受半结构化访谈,然后再进行研究治疗分配和暴露。访谈由三名评分员记录、转录和编码(评分员之间的可靠性为 85.0%-93.0%)。通过定性主题分析归纳出反应主题。 大约三分之二的参与者(n = 50,62.5%)倾向于由治疗师指导的 CBTI(面对面或通过远程医疗提供),而不是自动化的 dCBTI。参与者认为 dCBTI(55 人;68.8%)和远程医疗提供的 CBTI(65 人;81.3%)最常见的优点是方便。最常报告的 dCBTI 缺点是可定制性有限(n = 39,38.75%)和缺乏人际联系(n = 40,50.0%)。不过,也有一些参与者(n = 13,16.30%)认为缺乏人际交往是一种优势,理由是在线项目不带评判性,可以减少社交焦虑/疲劳。远程医疗提供的 CBTi 的主要缺点是失去了非语言交流(20 人,占 25%)。 虽然参与者指出了 dCBTI 和治疗师主导型 CBTI 的优缺点,但研究结果表明,中老年人普遍倾向于治疗师主导型治疗。本研究是首批研究参与者在接受研究治疗前对 CBTI 治疗方式的偏好和看法的研究之一。研究结果可以指导转诊医生向患者介绍失眠干预方案,并为有针对性地讨论治疗障碍提供信息。此外,研究结果还为今后研究治疗前偏好/认知与纵向治疗依从性、参与度和临床结果之间的关系奠定了基础。 1R01AG057500
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信