A Service-Led Pragmatic Evaluation of Family Foundations Targeting the Reduction of Perinatal Parent Mental Health Difficulties and Family Conflict in Australia

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Rebecca Giallo, Grace McMahon, Madison Schulz, Alison Fogarty, Monique Seymour, Casey Hosking, Helen Findley, Carolyn Wallace, Samantha Bladon, Mark Feinberg
{"title":"A Service-Led Pragmatic Evaluation of Family Foundations Targeting the Reduction of Perinatal Parent Mental Health Difficulties and Family Conflict in Australia","authors":"Rebecca Giallo,&nbsp;Grace McMahon,&nbsp;Madison Schulz,&nbsp;Alison Fogarty,&nbsp;Monique Seymour,&nbsp;Casey Hosking,&nbsp;Helen Findley,&nbsp;Carolyn Wallace,&nbsp;Samantha Bladon,&nbsp;Mark Feinberg","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A service-led evaluation of home-based Family Foundations (FF), a perinatal intervention targeting interparental conflict and mental health difficulties, was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. The aims were to assess (a) pre–post intervention changes, (b) parent satisfaction and (c) intervention fidelity. Participants included 288 families who completed self-report surveys, and FF clinicians who completed fidelity checklists. Approximately 78% of families who commenced FF completed all 10 sessions. High parent satisfaction and intervention fidelity were reported. For Parent 1s (primarily mothers), there were reductions in symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, interparental conflict and parenting hostility and increases in co-parenting support, parenting warmth and parenting self-efficacy—all associated with small effect sizes. For Parent 2s (primarily fathers), there were reductions in interparental conflict and parenting hostility and an increase in parenting self-efficacy—also associated with small effect sizes. These findings provide a platform for comprehensive and robust long-term evaluations of home-based FF in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"30 3","pages":"354-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A service-led evaluation of home-based Family Foundations (FF), a perinatal intervention targeting interparental conflict and mental health difficulties, was conducted in Melbourne, Australia. The aims were to assess (a) pre–post intervention changes, (b) parent satisfaction and (c) intervention fidelity. Participants included 288 families who completed self-report surveys, and FF clinicians who completed fidelity checklists. Approximately 78% of families who commenced FF completed all 10 sessions. High parent satisfaction and intervention fidelity were reported. For Parent 1s (primarily mothers), there were reductions in symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, interparental conflict and parenting hostility and increases in co-parenting support, parenting warmth and parenting self-efficacy—all associated with small effect sizes. For Parent 2s (primarily fathers), there were reductions in interparental conflict and parenting hostility and an increase in parenting self-efficacy—also associated with small effect sizes. These findings provide a platform for comprehensive and robust long-term evaluations of home-based FF in the future.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚以减少围产期父母心理健康困难和家庭冲突为目标的家庭基础服务实用性评估
在澳大利亚墨尔本,对以家庭为基础的 "家庭基础"(Family Foundations,FF)进行了一项服务主导评估,这是一项针对父母间冲突和心理健康困难的围产期干预措施。目的是评估 (a) 干预前后的变化,(b) 家长的满意度和 (c) 干预的忠实性。参与者包括填写自我报告调查表的 288 个家庭和填写忠实性检查表的 FF 临床医生。约有 78% 开始接受 FF 的家庭完成了全部 10 个疗程。据报告,家长的满意度和干预的忠实度都很高。对于家长 1(主要是母亲)来说,抑郁、焦虑和压力症状、父母间冲突和养育敌意有所减少,共同养育支持、养育温暖和养育自我效能有所提高--所有这些都与较小的效应大小有关。对于父母 2(主要是父亲),父母间的冲突和养育敌意有所减少,养育自我效能有所提高--同样具有较小的效应量。这些研究结果为今后对家庭为本 FF 进行全面、稳健的长期评估提供了一个平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信