Burhani Epistemology in The Scientific Development of Contemporary Pesantren

Anwar Ma’rufi, Saifudin, Khorun Nisa’, Muhajir
{"title":"Burhani Epistemology in The Scientific Development of Contemporary Pesantren","authors":"Anwar Ma’rufi, Saifudin, Khorun Nisa’, Muhajir","doi":"10.31538/tijie.v5i2.937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze and prove that the scientific development tradition of contemporary pesantren has begun to adopt a system of rational thinking (burhānī), which so far is still considered incapable of breaking away from the bayānī and 'irfanī reasoning. The dominance of bayānī and 'irfanī reason was assessed by Muhammad Abid Al-Jabiri as the source of the decline of Arab-Islamic civilization. The study in this paper is included in the qualitative research category through a literature study whose data sources come from books and journals. The data analysis technique follows the pattern developed by Miles and Huberman with a philosophical approach. The results of this research found that the tradition of contemporary pesantren scientific development has begun to follow a system of thinking in the progressive burhānī epistemology. This is characterized by: (1) the transformation of the Islamic boarding school/pesantren education system driven by visionary Kiai and (2) the pattern of development of fiqh and ushul fiqh that is appropriate to the times following the principles contained in the burhānī thinking system. This study revises previous research, which assessed that the tradition of scientific development in pesantren still follows the system of thinking in bayānī and 'irfanī reasoning.","PeriodicalId":406806,"journal":{"name":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","volume":"114 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i2.937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze and prove that the scientific development tradition of contemporary pesantren has begun to adopt a system of rational thinking (burhānī), which so far is still considered incapable of breaking away from the bayānī and 'irfanī reasoning. The dominance of bayānī and 'irfanī reason was assessed by Muhammad Abid Al-Jabiri as the source of the decline of Arab-Islamic civilization. The study in this paper is included in the qualitative research category through a literature study whose data sources come from books and journals. The data analysis technique follows the pattern developed by Miles and Huberman with a philosophical approach. The results of this research found that the tradition of contemporary pesantren scientific development has begun to follow a system of thinking in the progressive burhānī epistemology. This is characterized by: (1) the transformation of the Islamic boarding school/pesantren education system driven by visionary Kiai and (2) the pattern of development of fiqh and ushul fiqh that is appropriate to the times following the principles contained in the burhānī thinking system. This study revises previous research, which assessed that the tradition of scientific development in pesantren still follows the system of thinking in bayānī and 'irfanī reasoning.
当代菲律宾科学发展中的布尔哈尼认识论
本文旨在分析和证明当代长老会的科学发展传统已开始采用一种理性思维体系(burhānī),而这种体系至今仍被认为无法摆脱 bayānī 和 'irfanī 推理的束缚。穆罕默德-阿比德-贾比里(Muhammad Abid Al-Jabiri)认为,贝叶尼和伊尔法尼理性的主导地位是阿拉伯-伊斯兰文明衰落的根源。本文的研究属于定性研究范畴,通过文献研究进行,数据来源于书籍和期刊。数据分析技术采用了迈尔斯和休伯曼开发的哲学方法模式。研究结果发现,当代长老会科学发展的传统已开始遵循渐进式布尔哈尼认识论的思维体系。其特点是(1) 在有远见的嘉伊的推动下,伊斯兰寄宿学校/长老会教育体系发生了转变;(2) 遵循布尔哈尼思维体系所包含的原则,伊斯兰教法和伊斯兰教律的发展模式与时俱进。本研究对以前的研究进行了修正,以前的研究认为,长老会的科学发展传统仍然遵循 "bayānī "和 "irfanī "推理的思维体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信