A mixed methods study on continuity and care coordination based on the obstetric near miss approach

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Samuel M. Mulongo, Doreen Kaura, Bob Mash
{"title":"A mixed methods study on continuity and care coordination based on the obstetric near miss approach","authors":"Samuel M. Mulongo, Doreen Kaura, Bob Mash","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The near-miss approach assumes that mothers facing life-threatening conditions such as severe pre-eclampsia and postpartum haemorrhage share common risk factors. Among these women, those who survive (near-miss cases) can offer insights into the determinants, providing valuable lessons for understanding underlying factors.Aim: To investigate elements of continuity and coordination leading to obstetric near misses.Setting: A major referral hospital and its referral pathway in Kenya.Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.Results: Near-miss survivors had lower continuity and coordination of care indices during antenatal visits (COCI = 0.80, p = 0.0026), (modified continuity of care index [MCCI] = 0.62, p = 0.034), and those with non-life-threatening morbidity in the first trimester were more likely to experience a near miss (aOR = 4.34, p = 0.001). Facilities in the western region had a higher burden of near misses compared to the Eastern region. Qualitatively, three deductive themes were identified: sequential coordination, parallel coordination and continuity, along with factors classified as access. In mixed integration, poor continuity indices were explained by quality of interpersonal relationships and woman centredness. Poor coordination was explained by inadequate teamwork between providers in referring and referral facilities and between primary health facilities and the community. Higher near-miss rates in the western region resulted from differences in human and physical resources.Conclusion: Promoting woman-centred care, teamwork, improving communication and introducing innovative coordination roles like case and care managers can enhance continuity and coordination of maternal healthcare.Contributions: This study contributes to our understanding of the challenges of continuity and coordination in maternal healthcare in resource-poor settings by applying the WHO operationalisation of continuity and coordination using mixed methodology.","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The near-miss approach assumes that mothers facing life-threatening conditions such as severe pre-eclampsia and postpartum haemorrhage share common risk factors. Among these women, those who survive (near-miss cases) can offer insights into the determinants, providing valuable lessons for understanding underlying factors.Aim: To investigate elements of continuity and coordination leading to obstetric near misses.Setting: A major referral hospital and its referral pathway in Kenya.Methods: Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.Results: Near-miss survivors had lower continuity and coordination of care indices during antenatal visits (COCI = 0.80, p = 0.0026), (modified continuity of care index [MCCI] = 0.62, p = 0.034), and those with non-life-threatening morbidity in the first trimester were more likely to experience a near miss (aOR = 4.34, p = 0.001). Facilities in the western region had a higher burden of near misses compared to the Eastern region. Qualitatively, three deductive themes were identified: sequential coordination, parallel coordination and continuity, along with factors classified as access. In mixed integration, poor continuity indices were explained by quality of interpersonal relationships and woman centredness. Poor coordination was explained by inadequate teamwork between providers in referring and referral facilities and between primary health facilities and the community. Higher near-miss rates in the western region resulted from differences in human and physical resources.Conclusion: Promoting woman-centred care, teamwork, improving communication and introducing innovative coordination roles like case and care managers can enhance continuity and coordination of maternal healthcare.Contributions: This study contributes to our understanding of the challenges of continuity and coordination in maternal healthcare in resource-poor settings by applying the WHO operationalisation of continuity and coordination using mixed methodology.
基于产科险情处理方法的连续性和护理协调混合方法研究
背景:近乎失误的方法假定面临严重先兆子痫和产后出血等危及生命情况的母亲具有共同的风险因素。目的:调查导致产科险情的连续性和协调性因素:环境:肯尼亚一家大型转诊医院及其转诊途径:方法:解释性顺序混合方法设计:产前检查期间,险情幸存者的护理连续性和协调性指数较低(COCI = 0.80,p = 0.0026),(改良护理连续性指数 [MCCI] = 0.62,p = 0.034),在妊娠头三个月发生非危及生命的疾病者更有可能发生险情(aOR = 4.34,p = 0.001)。与东部地区相比,西部地区医疗机构的险情发生率更高。在定性方面,确定了三个演绎主题:顺序协调、平行协调和连续性,以及被归类为准入的因素。在混合整合中,人际关系质量和以妇女为中心解释了连续性差的原因。协调性差的原因是转诊和转诊机构的医疗服务提供者之间以及初级医疗机构和社区之间的团队合作不足。西部地区的险情发生率较高,原因在于人力和物力资源的差异:结论:促进以妇女为中心的护理、团队合作、改善沟通以及引入创新的协调角色(如病例和护理经理),可以加强孕产妇医疗保健的连续性和协调性:本研究采用混合方法,应用世界卫生组织的连续性和协调性操作方法,有助于我们了解在资源匮乏环境下孕产妇医疗保健的连续性和协调性所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信