Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs

Ülkü Dağdelen, N. Esenbuğa
{"title":"Comparison of Nonlinear Models to Describe the Growth of Tuj and Romanov x Tuj (F1) Lambs","authors":"Ülkü Dağdelen, N. Esenbuğa","doi":"10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and ROxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.","PeriodicalId":225627,"journal":{"name":"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture","volume":"94 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Sea Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1457139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the most suitable model for explaining weight changes in purebred Tuj (n=35) and Romanov x Tuj (RoxTuj) (F1) (n=25) lambs using non-linear models. Single-born lambs of both breeds and genders were included in the evaluation. Five different non-linear growth models were compared: Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards, and Weibull. The best model for describing growth was chosen based on four criteria: coefficient of determination (R²), mean square error (MSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Models with the highest R² and the lowest MSE, AIC, and BIC values were considered the best fit for the data. It was observed that the Brody model had the highest R2 and lowest MSE, AIC and BIC values for Tuj and ROxTuj (F1) female and male lambs. The Gompertz, Logistic, and Richards models exhibited similar predictive performance. In contrast, the Weibull model produced significantly different results compared to the other models when predicting weight changes. Therefore, the Brody model was identified as the most effective model for explaining growth patterns in both Tuj and RoxTuj (F1) lambs.
描述图伊和罗曼诺夫 x 图伊(F1)羔羊生长的非线性模型比较
本研究旨在利用非线性模型确定最适合解释纯种图伊羊(n=35)和罗曼诺夫×图伊羊(RoxTuj)(F1)(n=25)羔羊体重变化的模型。评估对象包括两个品种和性别的单胎羔羊。对五种不同的非线性生长模型进行了比较:Brody、Gompertz、Logistic、Richards 和 Weibull。根据四个标准选择了描述生长的最佳模型:决定系数(R²)、均方误差(MSE)、阿凯克信息准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)。R² 最高、MSE、AIC 和 BIC 值最低的模型被认为是最适合数据的模型。据观察,Brody 模型对 Tuj 和 ROxTuj(F1)雌性和雄性羔羊的 R2 最高,MSE、AIC 和 BIC 值最低。Gompertz、Logistic 和 Richards 模型表现出相似的预测性能。相比之下,在预测体重变化时,Weibull 模型的结果与其他模型明显不同。因此,布罗迪模型被认为是解释图氏和罗氏(F1)羔羊生长模式的最有效模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信