Obstacles of Online Learning Facing Nursing Students after the COVID-19 Pandemic

Q2 Environmental Science
Haitham Khatatbeh, Murad Alkhalaileh, Ibrahim Ayasreh, Atallah Habahbeh, Laith Alosoufe, Nisser Alhroub, Mohammed Albashtawy, Manar Abu-Abbas, Tariq N. Al-Dwaikat, Amira Mohammed Ali
{"title":"Obstacles of Online Learning Facing Nursing Students after the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Haitham Khatatbeh, Murad Alkhalaileh, Ibrahim Ayasreh, Atallah Habahbeh, Laith Alosoufe, Nisser Alhroub, Mohammed Albashtawy, Manar Abu-Abbas, Tariq N. Al-Dwaikat, Amira Mohammed Ali","doi":"10.1155/2024/5387908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the online style of instruction started to replace the traditional style in Jordan. Aims. This study aims to (1) assess the nursing students’ perceived obstacles to online learning in Jordan; (2) explore significant relationships between participants’ characteristics and their perceived obstacles; and (3) assess for significant differences in the perceived obstacles based on participants’ characteristics. Methods. A cross-sectional, descriptive design was utilized in this study. A convenient sample of 325 nursing students responded to a self-reported questionnaire utilizing Google Forms. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the dataset using the SPSS software. Results. The mean scores of the obstacles to online learning were 2.94 (SD = 0.95) for the academic obstacles subscale, 2.90 (SD = 0.83) for the technological obstacles subscale, and 3.25 (SD = 1.00) for the administrative obstacles subscale. Significant associations were found between participants’ characteristics and perceived obstacles to online learning. For instance, the type of university was significantly associated with academic (r = −0.32, p<0.01), technological (r = −0.21, p<0.01), and administrative obstacles (r = −0.32, p<0.01). Furthermore, significant differences were found in the perceived obstacles based on the participants’ demographic and studentship-related characteristics. Conclusions. According to their perceptions of online learning, nursing students in Jordan face three types of obstacles: academic, technical, and administrative. Decision-makers should intervene to enhance the online learning experience by overcoming the reported obstacles.","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5387908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the online style of instruction started to replace the traditional style in Jordan. Aims. This study aims to (1) assess the nursing students’ perceived obstacles to online learning in Jordan; (2) explore significant relationships between participants’ characteristics and their perceived obstacles; and (3) assess for significant differences in the perceived obstacles based on participants’ characteristics. Methods. A cross-sectional, descriptive design was utilized in this study. A convenient sample of 325 nursing students responded to a self-reported questionnaire utilizing Google Forms. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the dataset using the SPSS software. Results. The mean scores of the obstacles to online learning were 2.94 (SD = 0.95) for the academic obstacles subscale, 2.90 (SD = 0.83) for the technological obstacles subscale, and 3.25 (SD = 1.00) for the administrative obstacles subscale. Significant associations were found between participants’ characteristics and perceived obstacles to online learning. For instance, the type of university was significantly associated with academic (r = −0.32, p<0.01), technological (r = −0.21, p<0.01), and administrative obstacles (r = −0.32, p<0.01). Furthermore, significant differences were found in the perceived obstacles based on the participants’ demographic and studentship-related characteristics. Conclusions. According to their perceptions of online learning, nursing students in Jordan face three types of obstacles: academic, technical, and administrative. Decision-makers should intervene to enhance the online learning experience by overcoming the reported obstacles.
COVID-19 大流行后护理专业学生在线学习面临的障碍
背景。COVID-19 大流行之后,在线教学方式开始在约旦取代传统教学方式。研究目的本研究旨在:(1) 评估约旦护理专业学生对在线学习障碍的感知;(2) 探讨参与者的特征与其感知障碍之间的显著关系;(3) 根据参与者的特征评估感知障碍的显著差异。研究方法本研究采用横断面描述性设计。325 名护理专业学生利用谷歌表格对自我报告问卷进行了回答。使用 SPSS 软件对数据集进行描述性和推论性统计分析。研究结果学术障碍分量表的在线学习障碍平均得分为 2.94(SD = 0.95),技术障碍分量表的在线学习障碍平均得分为 2.90(SD = 0.83),行政障碍分量表的在线学习障碍平均得分为 3.25(SD = 1.00)。研究发现,参与者的特征与感知到的在线学习障碍之间存在显著关联。例如,大学类型与学术障碍(r = -0.32,p<0.01)、技术障碍(r = -0.21,p<0.01)和行政障碍(r = -0.32,p<0.01)显著相关。此外,根据参与者的人口统计学特征和与学生身份相关的特征,所感知的障碍也存在明显差异。结论根据他们对在线学习的看法,约旦的护理专业学生面临三种类型的障碍:学术障碍、技术障碍和行政障碍。决策者应采取干预措施,通过克服所报告的障碍来提升在线学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信