Modyfikacja tekstu prawnego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego – problem wykładni prawa czy niedozwolona wypowiedź normatywna

J. Piątkowski
{"title":"Modyfikacja tekstu prawnego w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego – problem wykładni prawa czy niedozwolona wypowiedź normatywna","authors":"J. Piątkowski","doi":"10.4467/25444654spp.24.003.19478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the analyses contained in the study is a phenomenon that raises fundamental controversies in the context of the principle of the tripartite division of powers in Poland, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of certainty of legal transactions. It concerns the tendency of judicial modification of the law for the purpose of a specific case being decided. The extreme and most far-reaching manifestation of judicial lawmaking is the modification of a legal text that is directly understood, i.e. one that does not give rise to any, even the slightest, doubts as to its content. In the current state of the law, there is no basis for modifying a legal text in the process of administering justice. Such modification means exceeding the limits of legal interpretation and is an impermissible normative statement. New legal rules may be formed in the activity of jurisprudence, but they must arise on the basis of a resultant relationship, following a process of restorative interpretation and provided that they are generally accepted by the judicature.","PeriodicalId":515897,"journal":{"name":"Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654spp.24.003.19478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the analyses contained in the study is a phenomenon that raises fundamental controversies in the context of the principle of the tripartite division of powers in Poland, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of certainty of legal transactions. It concerns the tendency of judicial modification of the law for the purpose of a specific case being decided. The extreme and most far-reaching manifestation of judicial lawmaking is the modification of a legal text that is directly understood, i.e. one that does not give rise to any, even the slightest, doubts as to its content. In the current state of the law, there is no basis for modifying a legal text in the process of administering justice. Such modification means exceeding the limits of legal interpretation and is an impermissible normative statement. New legal rules may be formed in the activity of jurisprudence, but they must arise on the basis of a resultant relationship, following a process of restorative interpretation and provided that they are generally accepted by the judicature.
最高法院判例中对法律条文的修改--法律解释问题或未经授权的规范性声明
本研究分析的主题是在波兰三权分立原则、法律确定性原则和法律交易确定性原则背景下引发根本争议的一种现象。它涉及到司法机关为了对具体案件进行裁决而修改法律的倾向。司法造法的极端和最深远的表现形式是修改直接理解的法律条文,即对其内容不产生任何怀疑,哪怕是最轻微的怀疑。就目前的法律状况而言,在司法过程中修改法律条文是没有依据的。这种修改意味着超越法律解释的界限,是不允许的规范性声明。新的法律规则可以在法学活动中形成,但它们必须在结果关系的基础上产生,遵循恢复性解释的过程,并得到司法机构的普遍接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信