Significance of blood culture testing after pancreatoduodenectomy

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tsukasa Aritake, Seiji Natsume, Tomonari Asano, Masataka Okuno, Naoya Itoh, Keitaro Matsuo, Seiji Ito, Koji Komori, Tetsuya Abe, Yasuhiro Shimizu
{"title":"Significance of blood culture testing after pancreatoduodenectomy","authors":"Tsukasa Aritake,&nbsp;Seiji Natsume,&nbsp;Tomonari Asano,&nbsp;Masataka Okuno,&nbsp;Naoya Itoh,&nbsp;Keitaro Matsuo,&nbsp;Seiji Ito,&nbsp;Koji Komori,&nbsp;Tetsuya Abe,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Shimizu","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of blood culture testing in the postoperative period of pancreatoduodectomy (PD), a highly invasive surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Rates of blood culture sampling and positivity were investigated for febrile episodes (FEs) in patients who underwent PD (2016–2021). FEs were defined as body temperature of 38.0°C or higher occurring on or after the 4th postoperative day. Fever origin was diagnosed retrospectively, and FEs were classified as pancreatic fistula (PF)-related or PF-unrelated FEs. Factors correlated with blood culture positivity were explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 339 patients who underwent PD, 99 experienced 202 FEs. Blood culture testing was performed on 160 FEs occurring in 89 patients. The sampling and positivity rates were 79.2% and 17.5%, respectively, per episode and 89.9% and 28.1%, respectively, per patient. Thirty-six FEs were classified as PF-related and 124 were classified as PF-unrelated FEs. The blood culture positivity rate was significantly lower in PF-related vs. PF-unrelated FEs (1/36 vs. 27/124, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.006). The blood culture positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with cholangitis, catheter-related blood stream infection, and urinary tract infection than PF-related FEs. Multivariate analysis showed that blood culture positivity was negatively associated with PF-related FEs and positively associated with accompanying symptoms of shivering, Pitt Bacteremia Score, and preoperative biliary drainage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent PD showed relatively high blood culture positivity rates. Based on these results, it may be possible to distinguish PF-related and -unrelated FEs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"8 5","pages":"888-895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12801","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of blood culture testing in the postoperative period of pancreatoduodectomy (PD), a highly invasive surgery.

Methods

Rates of blood culture sampling and positivity were investigated for febrile episodes (FEs) in patients who underwent PD (2016–2021). FEs were defined as body temperature of 38.0°C or higher occurring on or after the 4th postoperative day. Fever origin was diagnosed retrospectively, and FEs were classified as pancreatic fistula (PF)-related or PF-unrelated FEs. Factors correlated with blood culture positivity were explored.

Results

Among 339 patients who underwent PD, 99 experienced 202 FEs. Blood culture testing was performed on 160 FEs occurring in 89 patients. The sampling and positivity rates were 79.2% and 17.5%, respectively, per episode and 89.9% and 28.1%, respectively, per patient. Thirty-six FEs were classified as PF-related and 124 were classified as PF-unrelated FEs. The blood culture positivity rate was significantly lower in PF-related vs. PF-unrelated FEs (1/36 vs. 27/124, respectively, p = 0.006). The blood culture positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with cholangitis, catheter-related blood stream infection, and urinary tract infection than PF-related FEs. Multivariate analysis showed that blood culture positivity was negatively associated with PF-related FEs and positively associated with accompanying symptoms of shivering, Pitt Bacteremia Score, and preoperative biliary drainage.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent PD showed relatively high blood culture positivity rates. Based on these results, it may be possible to distinguish PF-related and -unrelated FEs.

Abstract Image

胰十二指肠切除术后血液培养检测的意义
本研究旨在阐明胰十二指肠切除术(PD)这一高侵袭性手术术后血液培养检测的意义。研究人员对接受胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的患者(2016-2021年)发热发作(FEs)的血液培养采样率和阳性率进行了调查。发热定义为术后第4天或之后发生的体温达到或超过38.0°C。发热的起源是通过回顾性诊断得出的,发热分为与胰瘘(PF)相关的发热和与PF无关的发热。在接受胰瘘手术的 339 名患者中,99 人出现了 202 例 FE。对 89 名患者的 160 例 FE 进行了血培养检测。每个病例的采样率和阳性率分别为 79.2% 和 17.5%,每个患者的采样率和阳性率分别为 89.9% 和 28.1%。36 例 FE 被归类为与 PF 相关,124 例被归类为与 PF 无关。与 PF 相关的 FE 的血培养阳性率明显低于与 PF 无关的 FE(分别为 1/36 对 27/124,P = 0.006)。胆管炎、导管相关血流感染和尿路感染患者的血培养阳性率明显高于 PF 相关 FE 患者。多变量分析显示,血培养阳性率与 PF 相关 FE 负相关,与伴随的颤抖症状、皮特菌血症评分和术前胆道引流正相关。根据这些结果,或许可以区分与 PF 相关和无关的 FE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信