Investigating Chinese In-service Teachers’ Concerns About Teaching Thinking Using the Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)

Guoqing Zhao, Beibei Fan, Yaxuan Wang, Murad Aliyev, Xingyan Sun
{"title":"Investigating Chinese In-service Teachers’ Concerns About Teaching Thinking Using the Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)","authors":"Guoqing Zhao, Beibei Fan, Yaxuan Wang, Murad Aliyev, Xingyan Sun","doi":"10.20849/jed.v8i2.1426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching thinking has been the focus of the new round of key competencies-oriented K-12 education reform in China. Based on the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM), this study investigated Chinese in-service teachers’ concerns about teaching thinking and how demographic variables affected their concerns. A questionnaire modified from the Stages of Concerns (SoC-TT) was used to collect the data. Altogether, 382 in-service teachers from 28 cities in China participated in this study by filling out the online questionnaire voluntarily and anonymously. The results showed that: (1) The modified seven-stage SoC-TT instrument showed satisfactory reliability and validity in the context of teaching thinking in China. (2) Teachers showed higher self-concerns (Informational and Personal) and impact concerns (Consequence, Collaboration, and Refocusing) while their task concerns (Management) about teaching thinking were relatively low. (3) Except for the Consequence stage, their demographic variables significantly influenced teachers’ concerns at other stages. Implications for professional development for teaching thinking were discussed.","PeriodicalId":510230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Development","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v8i2.1426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teaching thinking has been the focus of the new round of key competencies-oriented K-12 education reform in China. Based on the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM), this study investigated Chinese in-service teachers’ concerns about teaching thinking and how demographic variables affected their concerns. A questionnaire modified from the Stages of Concerns (SoC-TT) was used to collect the data. Altogether, 382 in-service teachers from 28 cities in China participated in this study by filling out the online questionnaire voluntarily and anonymously. The results showed that: (1) The modified seven-stage SoC-TT instrument showed satisfactory reliability and validity in the context of teaching thinking in China. (2) Teachers showed higher self-concerns (Informational and Personal) and impact concerns (Consequence, Collaboration, and Refocusing) while their task concerns (Management) about teaching thinking were relatively low. (3) Except for the Consequence stage, their demographic variables significantly influenced teachers’ concerns at other stages. Implications for professional development for teaching thinking were discussed.
利用 "基于关注的采纳模式"(CBAM)调查中国在职教师对思维教学的关注点
思维教学是中国新一轮以关键能力为导向的 K-12 教育改革的重点。本研究以 "基于关注的采纳模型"(CBAM)为基础,调查了中国在职教师对思维教学的关注以及人口统计学变量对其关注的影响。研究采用了一份由关注阶段(SoC-TT)修改而成的问卷来收集数据。来自中国 28 个城市的 382 名在职教师以自愿和匿名的方式填写了在线问卷。结果表明(1) 修改后的七阶段 SoC-TT 工具在中国的思维教学中表现出令人满意的信度和效度。(2) 教师对思维教学的自我关注(信息和个人)和影响关注(后果、合作和重新聚焦)较高,而任务关注(管理)相对较低。(3) 除 "后果 "阶段外,教师的人口统计学变量对其他阶段的关注点有显著影响。讨论了思维教学专业发展的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信