Clarifying the legal requirement for cross-border sharing of health data in POPIA: Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
L. Abdulrauf, B. L. Llb, Adaji, B. L. Llb, PhD H Ojibara
{"title":"Clarifying the legal requirement for cross-border sharing of health data in POPIA: Recommendations on the draft Code of Conduct for Research","authors":"L. Abdulrauf, B. L. Llb, Adaji, B. L. Llb, PhD H Ojibara","doi":"10.7196/sajbl.2024.v17i1.1969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nThe draft Code of Conduct for Research is an important initiative towards assisting the scientific community in complying with the provisions of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA). However, its approach towards cross-border data sharing should be reconsidered to clarify the ambiguities inherent in the legal requirements for the cross-border sharing of health data in the POPIA. These ambiguities include the concept of ‘transfer of information’, the application of adequacy as a legal mechanism for transfer, the nature of consent for cross-border sharing and the scope of the recipient third party. We suggest that the draft Code of Conduct for Research can be improved by:\n\n\nExplaining or defining the concept of ‘transfer of information’ and when it applies to cross-border sharing in research\n\n\nClarifying the application of adequacy as a legal mechanism for transfer vis-à-vis the other alternatives\n\n\nExpanding on the interpretation and application of consent as a legal mechanism for cross-border transfers\n\n\nExpanding the category of persons who may be recipients of personal information in a third country\n\n\n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajbl.2024.v17i1.1969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The draft Code of Conduct for Research is an important initiative towards assisting the scientific community in complying with the provisions of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA). However, its approach towards cross-border data sharing should be reconsidered to clarify the ambiguities inherent in the legal requirements for the cross-border sharing of health data in the POPIA. These ambiguities include the concept of ‘transfer of information’, the application of adequacy as a legal mechanism for transfer, the nature of consent for cross-border sharing and the scope of the recipient third party. We suggest that the draft Code of Conduct for Research can be improved by: Explaining or defining the concept of ‘transfer of information’ and when it applies to cross-border sharing in research Clarifying the application of adequacy as a legal mechanism for transfer vis-à-vis the other alternatives Expanding on the interpretation and application of consent as a legal mechanism for cross-border transfers Expanding the category of persons who may be recipients of personal information in a third country
明确 POPIA 中跨境共享健康数据的法律要求:关于《研究行为守则》草案的建议
研究行为守则草案是协助科学界遵守 2013 年第 4 号《个人信息保护法》(POPIA)规定的一项重要举措。然而,应重新考虑其对跨境数据共享的处理方法,以澄清《个人信息保护法》中关于跨境共享健康数据的法律要求中固有的模糊之处。这些不明确之处包括 "信息转移 "的概念、作为转移法律机制的适足性的应用、跨境共享同意的性质以及接收方第三方的范围。我们建议《研究行为准则》草案可以通过以下方式加以改进:解释或定义 "信息转让 "的概 念,以及该概念何时适用于研究中的跨境共享;明确适用适当性作为转让的法律机制与其他 替代机制的区别;扩展同意作为跨境转让的法律机制的解释和适用范围;扩展可能成为第三国 个人信息接收者的人员类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信