Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Anatomic Pathology.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Thomas J. Flotte, Stephanie A. Derauf, Rachel K Byrd, T. Kroneman, Debra A Bell, Lucas Stetzik, Seung-Yi Lee, Alireza Samiei, Steven N Hart, Joaquin J Garcia, Gillian Beamer, Thomas Westerling-Bui
{"title":"Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Anatomic Pathology.","authors":"Thomas J. Flotte, Stephanie A. Derauf, Rachel K Byrd, T. Kroneman, Debra A Bell, Lucas Stetzik, Seung-Yi Lee, Alireza Samiei, Steven N Hart, Joaquin J Garcia, Gillian Beamer, Thomas Westerling-Bui","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0205-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT.—\nArtificial intelligence is a transforming technology for anatomic pathology. Involvement within the workforce will foster support for algorithm development and implementation.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE.—\nTo develop a supportive ecosystem that enables pathologists with variable expertise in artificial intelligence to create algorithms in a development environment with seamless transition to a production environment.\n\n\nDESIGN.—\n\n\n\nRESULTS.—\nThe development team considered internal development and vended solutions. Because of the extended timeline and resource requirements for internal development, a decision was made to use a vended solution. Vendor proposals were solicited and reviewed by pathologists, IT, and security groups. A vendor was selected and pipelines for development and production were established. Proposals for development were solicited from the pathology department. Eighty-four investigators were selected for the initial cohort, receiving training and access to dedicated subject matter experts. A total of 30 of 31 projects progressed through the model development process of annotating, training, and validation. Based on these projects, 15 abstracts were submitted to national meetings.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS.—\nDemocratizing artificial intelligence by creating an ecosystem to support pathologists with varying levels of expertise can break down entry barriers, reduce overall cost of algorithm development, improve algorithm quality, and enhance the speed of adoption.","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0205-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT.— Artificial intelligence is a transforming technology for anatomic pathology. Involvement within the workforce will foster support for algorithm development and implementation. OBJECTIVE.— To develop a supportive ecosystem that enables pathologists with variable expertise in artificial intelligence to create algorithms in a development environment with seamless transition to a production environment. DESIGN.— RESULTS.— The development team considered internal development and vended solutions. Because of the extended timeline and resource requirements for internal development, a decision was made to use a vended solution. Vendor proposals were solicited and reviewed by pathologists, IT, and security groups. A vendor was selected and pipelines for development and production were established. Proposals for development were solicited from the pathology department. Eighty-four investigators were selected for the initial cohort, receiving training and access to dedicated subject matter experts. A total of 30 of 31 projects progressed through the model development process of annotating, training, and validation. Based on these projects, 15 abstracts were submitted to national meetings. CONCLUSIONS.— Democratizing artificial intelligence by creating an ecosystem to support pathologists with varying levels of expertise can break down entry barriers, reduce overall cost of algorithm development, improve algorithm quality, and enhance the speed of adoption.
解剖病理学中的人工智能民主化。
背景:人工智能是解剖病理学的一项变革性技术。目标:开发一个支持性生态系统,使具有不同人工智能专业知识的病理学家能够在开发环境中创建算法,并无缝过渡到生产环境。由于内部开发需要更长的时间和更多的资源,因此决定使用自动售货机解决方案。病理学家、IT 和安全小组征求并审查了供应商的建议。选定了一家供应商,并建立了开发和生产管道。向病理部门征集开发提案。84 名研究人员被选入初始组群,接受了培训并获得了专门的主题专家的帮助。在 31 个项目中,共有 30 个项目通过了注释、培训和验证等模型开发流程。结论:通过创建一个生态系统来支持具有不同专业水平的病理学家,实现人工智能的民主化,可以打破准入门槛、降低算法开发的总体成本、提高算法质量并加快采用速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信