Efficacy of resilience-related psychological interventions in patients with long-term diseases: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Fitria Endah Janitra, Ruey Chen, Hui-Chen Lin, Chien-Mei Sung, Hsin Chu, Chiu-Kuei Lee, Shu-Fen Niu, Hsin-I. Liu, Li-Fang Chang, Kondwani Joseph Banda, Kuei-Ru Chou
{"title":"Efficacy of resilience-related psychological interventions in patients with long-term diseases: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","authors":"Fitria Endah Janitra,&nbsp;Ruey Chen,&nbsp;Hui-Chen Lin,&nbsp;Chien-Mei Sung,&nbsp;Hsin Chu,&nbsp;Chiu-Kuei Lee,&nbsp;Shu-Fen Niu,&nbsp;Hsin-I. Liu,&nbsp;Li-Fang Chang,&nbsp;Kondwani Joseph Banda,&nbsp;Kuei-Ru Chou","doi":"10.1111/inm.13334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with long-term disease experience low resilience, emphasising the importance of psychological interventions to improve resilience. However, there is no comprehensive evidence on the efficacy of resilience-related psychological interventions (RRPIs) in this population. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate and extend knowledge from previous meta-analyses on the efficacy of RRPIs on resilience, stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life among patients with long-term disease. Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL electronic databases were searched until 3 February 2023. The pooled effect size of the efficacy of RRPIs was calculated using the Hedges' g (<i>g</i>) with random-effects model, while Cochrane <i>Q-</i>statistics and <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> tests assessed heterogeneity in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool evaluated the quality of studies. Moderator analysis was used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Twenty randomised controlled trial studies were identified, representing a total of 1388 individuals with long-term disease. RRPIs significantly enhance resilience (<i>g</i> = 0.79), alleviate stress (<i>g</i> = −0.78), decrease anxiety (<i>g</i> = −1.14), mitigate depression (<i>g</i> = −0.96) and improve quality of life (<i>g</i> = 0.48). Positive psychology, mindfulness, cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment-based intervention exhibited medium effects in strengthening resilience. Short-term effects of RRPIs on enhancing resilience were observed at 3-month follow-up period (<i>g</i> = 0.50). The incorporation of RRPIs into the management of patients with long-term disease shows a positive impact on their resilience, stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life. The results offer an evidence-based foundation for nurses in promoting resilience among patients with long-term disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with long-term disease experience low resilience, emphasising the importance of psychological interventions to improve resilience. However, there is no comprehensive evidence on the efficacy of resilience-related psychological interventions (RRPIs) in this population. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate and extend knowledge from previous meta-analyses on the efficacy of RRPIs on resilience, stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life among patients with long-term disease. Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL electronic databases were searched until 3 February 2023. The pooled effect size of the efficacy of RRPIs was calculated using the Hedges' g (g) with random-effects model, while Cochrane Q-statistics and I2 tests assessed heterogeneity in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool evaluated the quality of studies. Moderator analysis was used to explore sources of heterogeneity. Twenty randomised controlled trial studies were identified, representing a total of 1388 individuals with long-term disease. RRPIs significantly enhance resilience (g = 0.79), alleviate stress (g = −0.78), decrease anxiety (g = −1.14), mitigate depression (g = −0.96) and improve quality of life (g = 0.48). Positive psychology, mindfulness, cognitive behavioural therapy, acceptance and commitment-based intervention exhibited medium effects in strengthening resilience. Short-term effects of RRPIs on enhancing resilience were observed at 3-month follow-up period (g = 0.50). The incorporation of RRPIs into the management of patients with long-term disease shows a positive impact on their resilience, stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life. The results offer an evidence-based foundation for nurses in promoting resilience among patients with long-term disease.

与复原力相关的心理干预对长期病患者的疗效:随机对照试验荟萃分析。
长期患病的患者抗病能力较低,这就强调了心理干预对提高抗病能力的重要性。然而,目前还没有全面的证据表明抗逆力相关心理干预措施(RRPIs)对这类人群的疗效。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估和扩展以往荟萃分析中关于抗逆力相关心理干预对长期病患者的抗逆力、压力、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的疗效的知识。研究人员检索了 Cochrane Library、Embase、Ovid-MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 等电子数据库,检索期至 2023 年 2 月 3 日。使用随机效应模型Hedges'g (g)计算RRPIs疗效的汇集效应大小,同时使用Cochrane Q统计量和I2检验在Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0软件中评估异质性。Cochrane 偏倚风险 2.0 工具对研究质量进行了评估。调节分析用于探索异质性的来源。最终确定了 20 项随机对照试验研究,共涉及 1388 名长期患病者。RRPIs可明显增强复原力(g = 0.79)、减轻压力(g = -0.78)、降低焦虑(g = -1.14)、缓解抑郁(g = -0.96)并提高生活质量(g = 0.48)。积极心理学、正念、认知行为疗法、接受和承诺式干预在增强复原力方面表现出中等效果。在 3 个月的随访期间,观察到 RRPIs 对增强复原力的短期效果(g = 0.50)。将 RRPI 纳入长期疾病患者的管理中,对他们的复原力、压力、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量都有积极影响。这些结果为护士促进长期病患者的恢复力提供了循证基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信