EXPRESS: Sharing the Shared Rides: Multi-party Carpooling Supported Strategy-Proof Double Auctions

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Hao Yu, Min Huang, Xiaohang Yue
{"title":"EXPRESS: Sharing the Shared Rides: Multi-party Carpooling Supported Strategy-Proof Double Auctions","authors":"Hao Yu, Min Huang, Xiaohang Yue","doi":"10.1177/10591478241252746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-party carpooling emerges as a burgeoning shared transportation scheme whereby the trip shared by each driver is shared among multi-party riders whose itineraries coincide. Confronting the information asymmetry and the voluntary self-interested nature of bilateral participants in matching and pricing operations, this study designs Multiparty cArpooling SupporTed stratEgy-pRoof (MASTER) double auction mechanisms considering personalized carpooling constraints. First, in a scheduled carpooling scenario, two MASTERS mechanisms that masterfully blend the ideas of the famed trade reduction method and multi-stage approach are proposed which implement distinct group bid determination approaches for responding to different market conditions. Second, in an on-demand carpooling scenario, two parameterized MASTERO mechanisms that integrate frustration-based promotion to proactively prioritize matching and deferentially compensate riders based on their waits are contrived which also endow the platform with operational flexibility to agilely pursue alterable operational objectives by adjusting promotion strength. We prove theoretically that the proposed mechanisms satisfy strategy proofness (SP), budget balance (BB), individual rationality (IR), and asymptotic efficiency (AsE) under mild conditions. Experimental results reveal that multi-party carpooling constitutes a multi-win solution under higher rider-driver ratios whilst it could be detrimental to drivers otherwise, which can be ameliorated by favoring the driver side in determining promotion strength. Simulation studies manifest that our proposed auction mechanisms could bring benefits concerning allocation efficiency and service responsiveness compared with their academic and practical counterparts.We also shed light on choosing among alternative mechanisms according to market conditions and operational orientations.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241252746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-party carpooling emerges as a burgeoning shared transportation scheme whereby the trip shared by each driver is shared among multi-party riders whose itineraries coincide. Confronting the information asymmetry and the voluntary self-interested nature of bilateral participants in matching and pricing operations, this study designs Multiparty cArpooling SupporTed stratEgy-pRoof (MASTER) double auction mechanisms considering personalized carpooling constraints. First, in a scheduled carpooling scenario, two MASTERS mechanisms that masterfully blend the ideas of the famed trade reduction method and multi-stage approach are proposed which implement distinct group bid determination approaches for responding to different market conditions. Second, in an on-demand carpooling scenario, two parameterized MASTERO mechanisms that integrate frustration-based promotion to proactively prioritize matching and deferentially compensate riders based on their waits are contrived which also endow the platform with operational flexibility to agilely pursue alterable operational objectives by adjusting promotion strength. We prove theoretically that the proposed mechanisms satisfy strategy proofness (SP), budget balance (BB), individual rationality (IR), and asymptotic efficiency (AsE) under mild conditions. Experimental results reveal that multi-party carpooling constitutes a multi-win solution under higher rider-driver ratios whilst it could be detrimental to drivers otherwise, which can be ameliorated by favoring the driver side in determining promotion strength. Simulation studies manifest that our proposed auction mechanisms could bring benefits concerning allocation efficiency and service responsiveness compared with their academic and practical counterparts.We also shed light on choosing among alternative mechanisms according to market conditions and operational orientations.
快讯共享共乘:多方拼车支持策略验证型双重拍卖
多方拼车作为一种新兴的共享交通方案应运而生,通过这种方式,每位驾驶员分担的行程由行程一致的多方乘客共享。面对匹配和定价操作中的信息不对称和双边参与者的自愿自利性质,本研究设计了考虑个性化拼车约束的多方拼车支持策略(MASTER)双重拍卖机制。首先,在计划拼车场景中,提出了两种 MASTERS 机制,巧妙地融合了著名的交易缩减法和多阶段法的思想,针对不同的市场条件实施不同的分组竞价确定方法。其次,在按需拼车场景中,我们设计了两种参数化的 MASTERO 机制,它们融合了基于挫折感的促销方法,可主动优先匹配乘客,并根据乘客的等待时间给予补偿,这也赋予了平台运营的灵活性,使其能够通过调整促销力度来灵活地追求可改变的运营目标。我们从理论上证明了所提出的机制在温和条件下满足策略证明性(SP)、预算平衡(BB)、个体理性(IR)和渐进效率(AsE)。实验结果表明,在乘客与司机比例较高的情况下,多方拼车是一种多赢方案,而在其他情况下,多方拼车可能对司机不利,这可以通过在决定促销力度时偏向司机一方来改善。模拟研究表明,我们提出的拍卖机制与学术界和实践中的拍卖机制相比,可以在分配效率和服务响应性方面带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信