Can mental fatigue affect perception of barbell velocity in resistance training?

Ruggero Romagnoli, Luca Filipas, Maria Francesca Piacentini
{"title":"Can mental fatigue affect perception of barbell velocity in resistance training?","authors":"Ruggero Romagnoli,&nbsp;Luca Filipas,&nbsp;Maria Francesca Piacentini","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perception of Velocity (PV) is the ability to estimate single repetition velocity during resistance training (RT) exercises. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of Mental Fatigue (MF) on the accuracy of barbell PV. The secondary aims were to evaluate whether MF affected RT performance and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE; OMNI-RES) in the back squat. Twenty-four (14 Females, 10 Males) resistance-trained participants underwent 2 familiarization sessions and 1RM test for the back squat. In two separate sessions, PV was tested for light, medium, and heavy loads in 2 conditions in random order: at rest (REST) and in MF condition (POST-MF) induced by previous incongruent Stroop color-word task. MF and Motivation were assessed through visual analog scales (VAS; 0–100) before and after the Stroop task. For each load subjects performed 2 repetitions and reported the RPE value. Mean propulsive velocity (Vr) of the barbell was recorded with a linear encoder, while the perceived velocity (Vp) of the subjects was self-reported using the Squat-PV scale. The PV accuracy was calculated through the delta score (ds: Vp–Vr). Following the Stroop task MF increased significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; <i>F</i> (1, 23) = 52.572), while motivation decreased (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05; <i>F</i> (1, 23) = 7.401). Ds, Vr, and RPE did not show significant differences between conditions (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) for the three loads analyzed. MF induced by previous demanding cognitive task did not affect PV accuracy. Furthermore, subjects maintained unchanged both RT performance and RPE values associated with each load, even when mentally fatigued.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perception of Velocity (PV) is the ability to estimate single repetition velocity during resistance training (RT) exercises. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of Mental Fatigue (MF) on the accuracy of barbell PV. The secondary aims were to evaluate whether MF affected RT performance and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE; OMNI-RES) in the back squat. Twenty-four (14 Females, 10 Males) resistance-trained participants underwent 2 familiarization sessions and 1RM test for the back squat. In two separate sessions, PV was tested for light, medium, and heavy loads in 2 conditions in random order: at rest (REST) and in MF condition (POST-MF) induced by previous incongruent Stroop color-word task. MF and Motivation were assessed through visual analog scales (VAS; 0–100) before and after the Stroop task. For each load subjects performed 2 repetitions and reported the RPE value. Mean propulsive velocity (Vr) of the barbell was recorded with a linear encoder, while the perceived velocity (Vp) of the subjects was self-reported using the Squat-PV scale. The PV accuracy was calculated through the delta score (ds: Vp–Vr). Following the Stroop task MF increased significantly (p < 0.001; F (1, 23) = 52.572), while motivation decreased (p < 0.05; F (1, 23) = 7.401). Ds, Vr, and RPE did not show significant differences between conditions (p > 0.05) for the three loads analyzed. MF induced by previous demanding cognitive task did not affect PV accuracy. Furthermore, subjects maintained unchanged both RT performance and RPE values associated with each load, even when mentally fatigued.

Abstract Image

心理疲劳会影响阻力训练中杠铃速度的感知吗?
速度感知(PV)是指在阻力训练(RT)练习中估计单次重复速度的能力。研究的主要目的是评估心理疲劳(MF)对杠铃速度感知准确性的影响。次要目的是评估心理疲劳是否会影响阻力训练成绩和后蹲时的体力感知评分(RPE;OMNI-RES)。24名阻力训练参与者(14 名女性,10 名男性)接受了两次熟悉训练和背蹲 1RM 测试。在两个独立的环节中,分别对轻度、中度和重度负荷进行了测试,测试在两种条件下随机进行:静止状态(REST)和由先前不协调的 Stroop 颜色词任务诱发的 MF 状态(POST-MF)。在完成 Stroop 任务前后,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS;0-100)对中频和动机进行评估。受试者对每种负荷进行 2 次重复,并报告 RPE 值。杠铃的平均推进速度(Vr)由线性编码器记录,而受试者的感知速度(Vp)则由受试者使用下蹲-PV 量表进行自我报告。PV 精确度通过 delta 分数(ds:Vp-Vr)计算。在完成 Stroop 任务后,所分析的三种负荷的 MF 均显著增加(P 0.05)。之前的认知任务所引起的 MF 不会影响 PV 的准确性。此外,即使在精神疲劳时,受试者也能保持与每种负荷相关的 RT 性能和 RPE 值不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信