Associations Between Resistance Training and All-Cause Mortality: NHANES 1999-2006

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1177/15598276241248107

Robert Booker, Mandy Wong, William Boyer, Jessica Gorzelitz, Mercedes R Carnethon, S. Alexandria

{"title":"Associations Between Resistance Training and All-Cause Mortality: NHANES 1999-2006","authors":"Robert Booker, Mandy Wong, William Boyer, Jessica Gorzelitz, Mercedes R Carnethon, S. Alexandria","doi":"10.1177/15598276241248107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Physical Activity Guidelines 2nd Edition recommends ≥2 days of resistance training (RT). Evidence supports a dose-response relation between RT volume and cardiometabolic health. We examined whether RT guidelines and volume were associated with lower all-cause mortality. Methods: Participants from the 1999-2006 NHANES cycles (N = 5855) self-reported the past 30 days of physical activity including the number of sessions, average session duration in minutes, and activity type. Mortality was ascertained from the linked National Death Index through the end of 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for all-cause mortality by RT Guideline adherence and per 1000 MET-minutes of monthly RT volume. Results: Approximately 1-in-10 participants met the RT Guidelines (n = 612, 11.6%). The mean monthly RT volume was 2033.3 ± 2487.7 MET-minutes. Mortality incidence was 10.6% (n = 886). Neither meeting the Guidelines (HR [95% CI]; 1.02 [.74, 1.41], compared to not meeting the Guidelines) nor monthly RT volume per 1000 MET-minutes (1.02 [.92, 1.14]) was associated with all-cause mortality in adjusted models, with no evidence of effect modification by sex or age. Conclusions: The present study did not find an association between RT and all-cause mortality. These results do not support the RT canon, warranting further investigation.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241248107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Physical Activity Guidelines 2nd Edition recommends ≥2 days of resistance training (RT). Evidence supports a dose-response relation between RT volume and cardiometabolic health. We examined whether RT guidelines and volume were associated with lower all-cause mortality. Methods: Participants from the 1999-2006 NHANES cycles (N = 5855) self-reported the past 30 days of physical activity including the number of sessions, average session duration in minutes, and activity type. Mortality was ascertained from the linked National Death Index through the end of 2019. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for all-cause mortality by RT Guideline adherence and per 1000 MET-minutes of monthly RT volume. Results: Approximately 1-in-10 participants met the RT Guidelines (n = 612, 11.6%). The mean monthly RT volume was 2033.3 ± 2487.7 MET-minutes. Mortality incidence was 10.6% (n = 886). Neither meeting the Guidelines (HR [95% CI]; 1.02 [.74, 1.41], compared to not meeting the Guidelines) nor monthly RT volume per 1000 MET-minutes (1.02 [.92, 1.14]) was associated with all-cause mortality in adjusted models, with no evidence of effect modification by sex or age. Conclusions: The present study did not find an association between RT and all-cause mortality. These results do not support the RT canon, warranting further investigation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

阻力训练与全因死亡率之间的关系：1999-2006 年全国健康调查

背景：体力活动指南》第二版建议进行≥2 天的阻力训练（RT）。有证据表明，阻力训练量与心脏代谢健康之间存在剂量-反应关系。我们研究了阻力训练指南和阻力训练量是否与降低全因死亡率有关。研究方法1999-2006 年 NHANES 循环的参与者（N = 5855）自我报告了过去 30 天的体育锻炼情况，包括锻炼次数、平均持续时间（分钟）和活动类型。截至 2019 年底的死亡率是根据相关的国家死亡指数确定的。采用考克斯比例危险回归法估算了RT指南遵守情况和每月RT量每1000 MET-分钟的全因死亡率危险比。结果：大约十分之一的参与者符合 RT 指南（n = 612，11.6%）。平均每月 RT 量为 2033.3 ± 2487.7 MET-分钟。死亡率为 10.6%（n = 886）。在调整模型中，符合《指南》（与不符合《指南》相比，HR [95% CI]; 1.02 [.74，1.41]）或每月每 1000 MET 分钟的 RT 量（1.02 [.92，1.14]）均与全因死亡率无关，没有证据表明性别或年龄会对效果产生影响。结论：本研究未发现 RT 与全因死亡率之间存在关联。这些结果不支持 RT 教规，值得进一步研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.