Comprehensive Evaluation of Biofuels from the Fermentation of Poplar Wood and the Gasification of Fermentation Residue

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Wei Wang, Zhaoping Zhong, Xiaoming Bao, Xiaotian Pan, Xiang Zheng, Yuxuan Yang, Zhaocheng Shen
{"title":"Comprehensive Evaluation of Biofuels from the Fermentation of Poplar Wood and the Gasification of Fermentation Residue","authors":"Wei Wang,&nbsp;Zhaoping Zhong,&nbsp;Xiaoming Bao,&nbsp;Xiaotian Pan,&nbsp;Xiang Zheng,&nbsp;Yuxuan Yang,&nbsp;Zhaocheng Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10760-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the process of poplar fermentation for ethanol, different methods are adopted to achieve efficient treatment and resource utilization of fermentation residues, which meets the current demand for green energy and carbon neutrality. Therefore, this work aims to establish an evaluation method on energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and cost expenditures in the production process for biofuels from poplar wood and residue. The process was simulated with commercial software (<i>Aspen Plus</i> for chemical production simulation and cost estimation and <i>eBalance</i> for LCA). Results showed that compared to FCE, it made a higher conversion efficiency of CFG because of the biojet fuel and gasoline from the gasification and conversion of residual lignin. And the flash evaporator, hydrolysis reactor, and fermentation reactor were components with the highest exergy loss. The economic cost of CFG was 9.63% less than that of FCE, and cellulase enzymes and poplar wood in variable costs were main factors in the total cost. Comparing environmental impacts from four perspectives, it was found that the total comprehensive impact of FCE was higher than that of CFG under each weight. The degree of influence of the first level indicator layer was energy consumption, environmental impact, and economic cost in descending order.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1543 - 1558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10760-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the process of poplar fermentation for ethanol, different methods are adopted to achieve efficient treatment and resource utilization of fermentation residues, which meets the current demand for green energy and carbon neutrality. Therefore, this work aims to establish an evaluation method on energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and cost expenditures in the production process for biofuels from poplar wood and residue. The process was simulated with commercial software (Aspen Plus for chemical production simulation and cost estimation and eBalance for LCA). Results showed that compared to FCE, it made a higher conversion efficiency of CFG because of the biojet fuel and gasoline from the gasification and conversion of residual lignin. And the flash evaporator, hydrolysis reactor, and fermentation reactor were components with the highest exergy loss. The economic cost of CFG was 9.63% less than that of FCE, and cellulase enzymes and poplar wood in variable costs were main factors in the total cost. Comparing environmental impacts from four perspectives, it was found that the total comprehensive impact of FCE was higher than that of CFG under each weight. The degree of influence of the first level indicator layer was energy consumption, environmental impact, and economic cost in descending order.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

杨木发酵和发酵残渣气化产生的生物燃料综合评估
在杨木发酵生产乙醇的过程中,采用不同的方法实现发酵残渣的高效处理和资源化利用,符合当前绿色能源和碳中和的要求。因此,本研究旨在建立杨木及残渣生物燃料生产过程中的能耗、污染物排放和成本支出的评估方法。使用商业软件(用于化工生产模拟和成本估算的 Aspen Plus 和用于生命周期评估的 eBalance)对生产过程进行了模拟。结果表明,与 FCE 相比,CFG 的转化效率更高,因为残余木质素的气化和转化产生了生物喷气燃料和汽油。而闪蒸器、水解反应器和发酵反应器是放能损失最大的部件。CFG 的经济成本比 FCE 低 9.63%,可变成本中的纤维素酶和杨木是影响总成本的主要因素。从四个角度比较环境影响发现,在各权重下,FCE 的总综合影响均高于 CFG。一级指标层的影响程度依次为能耗、环境影响和经济成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信