Wolverine density, survival, and population trends in the Canadian boreal forest

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Matthew A. Scrafford, Jacob L. Seguin, Laura K. McCaw, Mark S. Boyce, Justina C. Ray
{"title":"Wolverine density, survival, and population trends in the Canadian boreal forest","authors":"Matthew A. Scrafford,&nbsp;Jacob L. Seguin,&nbsp;Laura K. McCaw,&nbsp;Mark S. Boyce,&nbsp;Justina C. Ray","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is limited information available on wolverine (<i>Gulo gulo</i>) population density and trends in the boreal forest of North America. We estimated wolverine density using spatial capture-recapture methods across 2 boreal forest study areas in Red Lake, Ontario (26,568 km<sup>2</sup>) and Rainbow Lake, Alberta (19,084 km<sup>2</sup>), Canada. We also used radio-telemetry data to estimate annual survival of adult and sub-adult wolverines and evaluated population trends with a stage-based matrix model. We used an array of run poles and live traps to detect wolverines. In Red Lake over 3 winter field seasons (2019–2022), we detected 56 individual wolverines (17 females, 32 males, and 7 unknown sex), and in Rainbow Lake over 2 field seasons (2014–2016), we detected 48 individuals (19 females, 18 males, and 11 of unknown sex). Average densities in Red Lake and Rainbow Lake were 3.64 and 6.74 wolverines/1,000 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Adults and sub-adults occurred at equal abundance. Spring snow cover, roads, and industrial developments were not associated with spatial patterns of wolverine density. Most deaths occurred near roads; wolverines were killed in fur traps set along roads, by wolves using roads to travel, and by vehicles. The largest source of death was from incidental (<i>n</i> = 6 in Red Lake) or licensed fur trapping (<i>n</i> = 8 in Rainbow Lake) and we report 8 injuries from fur trapping sets. Red Lake survival estimates for adults (0.87) and sub-adults (0.86) contributed to a stable population trend. Rainbow Lake survival estimates for adults (0.66) and sub-adults (0.50) contributed to a declining population trend based on a relatively low sample of radio-days. Red Lake and Rainbow Lake combined survival estimates for adults (0.77) and sub-adults (0.73) also contributed to a declining population trend. Our survival and population modeling suggests that human-caused mortality is a significant risk to these populations. Our results can be applied to wolverine status assessments and used as benchmarks for future monitoring. Wolverine population stability or growth might be achieved by reducing incidental trapping deaths or injury and hindering human access to wolverine habitats through decommissioning or limiting development of industrial roads or other anthropogenic linear features.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited information available on wolverine (Gulo gulo) population density and trends in the boreal forest of North America. We estimated wolverine density using spatial capture-recapture methods across 2 boreal forest study areas in Red Lake, Ontario (26,568 km2) and Rainbow Lake, Alberta (19,084 km2), Canada. We also used radio-telemetry data to estimate annual survival of adult and sub-adult wolverines and evaluated population trends with a stage-based matrix model. We used an array of run poles and live traps to detect wolverines. In Red Lake over 3 winter field seasons (2019–2022), we detected 56 individual wolverines (17 females, 32 males, and 7 unknown sex), and in Rainbow Lake over 2 field seasons (2014–2016), we detected 48 individuals (19 females, 18 males, and 11 of unknown sex). Average densities in Red Lake and Rainbow Lake were 3.64 and 6.74 wolverines/1,000 km2, respectively. Adults and sub-adults occurred at equal abundance. Spring snow cover, roads, and industrial developments were not associated with spatial patterns of wolverine density. Most deaths occurred near roads; wolverines were killed in fur traps set along roads, by wolves using roads to travel, and by vehicles. The largest source of death was from incidental (n = 6 in Red Lake) or licensed fur trapping (n = 8 in Rainbow Lake) and we report 8 injuries from fur trapping sets. Red Lake survival estimates for adults (0.87) and sub-adults (0.86) contributed to a stable population trend. Rainbow Lake survival estimates for adults (0.66) and sub-adults (0.50) contributed to a declining population trend based on a relatively low sample of radio-days. Red Lake and Rainbow Lake combined survival estimates for adults (0.77) and sub-adults (0.73) also contributed to a declining population trend. Our survival and population modeling suggests that human-caused mortality is a significant risk to these populations. Our results can be applied to wolverine status assessments and used as benchmarks for future monitoring. Wolverine population stability or growth might be achieved by reducing incidental trapping deaths or injury and hindering human access to wolverine habitats through decommissioning or limiting development of industrial roads or other anthropogenic linear features.

Abstract Image

加拿大北方森林中狼獾的密度、存活率和种群趋势
关于北美北方森林中狼獾(Gulo gulo)的种群密度和趋势的信息非常有限。我们在加拿大安大略省红湖(26,568 平方公里)和阿尔伯塔省彩虹湖(19,084 平方公里)的两个北方森林研究区采用空间捕获-再捕获方法估算了狼獾的密度。我们还使用无线电遥测数据估算成年和亚成年狼獾的年存活率,并使用基于阶段的矩阵模型评估种群趋势。我们使用了一系列跑杆和活体诱捕器来探测貂熊。在红湖的3个冬季野外季节(2019-2022年)中,我们检测到56只狼獾个体(17只雌性、32只雄性和7只性别不明的个体);在彩虹湖的2个野外季节(2014-2016年)中,我们检测到48只狼獾个体(19只雌性、18只雄性和11只性别不明的个体)。红湖和彩虹湖的平均密度分别为 3.64 和 6.74 头狼獾/1,000 平方公里。成年狼獾和亚成年狼獾的数量相当。春季积雪、道路和工业发展与狼獾密度的空间模式无关。大多数狼獾的死亡都发生在道路附近;狼獾死于沿路设置的毛皮陷阱、狼群利用道路行进以及车辆。最大的死亡来源是意外死亡(红湖,n = 6)或特许皮毛诱捕(彩虹湖,n = 8),我们报告了8起皮毛诱捕造成的伤害。红湖的成体存活率(0.87)和亚成体存活率(0.86)为稳定的种群趋势做出了贡献。彩虹湖的成体存活率(0.66)和亚成体存活率(0.50)则导致种群数量呈下降趋势,而这是基于相对较低的无线电日样本。红湖和彩虹湖成鱼(0.77)和亚成鱼(0.73)的综合存活率估计值也导致种群数量呈下降趋势。我们的存活率和种群模型表明,人为死亡是这些种群面临的一个重大风险。我们的研究结果可用于貂熊现状评估,并作为未来监测的基准。狼獾种群的稳定或增长可以通过减少意外诱捕致死或致伤,以及通过停止使用或限制开发工业道路或其他人为线性特征来阻碍人类进入狼獾栖息地来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信