Conversion of boiler houses to alternative fuel

E. N. Makeeva, E. R. Zvereva, O. Y. Morozova
{"title":"Conversion of boiler houses to alternative fuel","authors":"E. N. Makeeva, E. R. Zvereva, O. Y. Morozova","doi":"10.30724/1998-9903-2024-26-1-107-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   THE PURPOSE. To justify the need to transfer boiler houses from fuel oil to furnace domestic fuel.   METHODS. Comparative studies of the main indicators of the quality of fuel oil and domestic heating oil (DHO) (heat of combustion, kinematic viscosity, flash point, pour point, ash content, humidity, sulfur content) were carried out. The environmental parameters of pollutants formed during the combustion of fuel oil and domestic stove fuel are calculated and compared with the values regulated by the EkoNiP 17.01.06-001-2017 \"Environmental protection and nature management. Requirements of environmental safety\" and TCU 17.02-XX-2019 \"Environmental protection and nature management\".   RESULTS. As a result of comparative studies of the main indicators of the quality of fuel oil and furnace household fuel (PBT), it was shown that combustion in PBT boilers in comparison with fuel oil is preferable in terms of environmental consequences in terms of emissions into the atmosphere. As a result of the comparative analysis, it was found that during the transition from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, compliance with the basic environmental standards regulated by these regulatory documents is ensured by reducing by 70 times the amount of sulfur dioxide released into the atmospheric air during 10 days of burning furnace household fuel, as well as reducing the concentration of this type of emission by 72.5 times. When switching from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, pollution and equipment wear are also reduced due to the ash content index for furnace household fuel being 7 times lower than that of fuel oil, as well as a 2-fold reduction in the formation of soot and 70-fold reduction in sulfur dioxide during ten-day use of a new reserve type of fuel.   CONCLUSION. Thus, as a result of experimental and calculated studies, it was shown that combustion in DHO boilers in comparison with fuel oil is preferable in terms of environmental consequences in terms of emissions into the atmosphere, reducing corrosion, stopping boilers for repairs, reducing fuel heating costs to facilitate transportation, reducing steam and fuel costs. When switching from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, pollution and equipment wear are also reduced due to the ash content index for furnace household fuel that is 7 times lower than that of fuel oil, as well as a 2-fold reduction in the formation of soot and 70-fold reduction in sulfur dioxide during ten-day use of a new reserve type of fuel.","PeriodicalId":222237,"journal":{"name":"Power engineering: research, equipment, technology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power engineering: research, equipment, technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2024-26-1-107-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   THE PURPOSE. To justify the need to transfer boiler houses from fuel oil to furnace domestic fuel.   METHODS. Comparative studies of the main indicators of the quality of fuel oil and domestic heating oil (DHO) (heat of combustion, kinematic viscosity, flash point, pour point, ash content, humidity, sulfur content) were carried out. The environmental parameters of pollutants formed during the combustion of fuel oil and domestic stove fuel are calculated and compared with the values regulated by the EkoNiP 17.01.06-001-2017 "Environmental protection and nature management. Requirements of environmental safety" and TCU 17.02-XX-2019 "Environmental protection and nature management".   RESULTS. As a result of comparative studies of the main indicators of the quality of fuel oil and furnace household fuel (PBT), it was shown that combustion in PBT boilers in comparison with fuel oil is preferable in terms of environmental consequences in terms of emissions into the atmosphere. As a result of the comparative analysis, it was found that during the transition from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, compliance with the basic environmental standards regulated by these regulatory documents is ensured by reducing by 70 times the amount of sulfur dioxide released into the atmospheric air during 10 days of burning furnace household fuel, as well as reducing the concentration of this type of emission by 72.5 times. When switching from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, pollution and equipment wear are also reduced due to the ash content index for furnace household fuel being 7 times lower than that of fuel oil, as well as a 2-fold reduction in the formation of soot and 70-fold reduction in sulfur dioxide during ten-day use of a new reserve type of fuel.   CONCLUSION. Thus, as a result of experimental and calculated studies, it was shown that combustion in DHO boilers in comparison with fuel oil is preferable in terms of environmental consequences in terms of emissions into the atmosphere, reducing corrosion, stopping boilers for repairs, reducing fuel heating costs to facilitate transportation, reducing steam and fuel costs. When switching from fuel oil to furnace household fuel, pollution and equipment wear are also reduced due to the ash content index for furnace household fuel that is 7 times lower than that of fuel oil, as well as a 2-fold reduction in the formation of soot and 70-fold reduction in sulfur dioxide during ten-day use of a new reserve type of fuel.
锅炉房改用替代燃料
目的。证明锅炉房从燃油转为炉用家用燃料的必要性。 方法: 对燃油和家用取暖油(DHO)质量的主要指标(燃烧热、运动粘度、闪点、倾点、灰分含量、湿度、硫含量)进行比较研究。计算了燃料油和家用炉灶燃料燃烧过程中形成的污染物环境参数,并与 EkoNiP 17.01.06-001-2017 "环境保护和自然管理 "规定的数值进行了比较。环境安全要求 "和 TCU 17.02-XX-2019 "环境保护和自然管理 "的规定值进行比较。 结果。通过对燃油和炉用家用燃料(PBT)的主要质量指标进行比较研究,结果表明,与燃油相比,在 PBT 锅炉中燃烧对大气排放的环境影响更佳。比较分析的结果表明,在从燃油向家用炉燃料过渡的过程中,通过将燃烧家用炉燃料 10 天内释放到大气中的二氧化硫量减少 70 倍,并将此类排放物的浓度减少 72.5 倍,可确保符合这些法规文件规定的基本环境标准。从燃油改用炉用燃料后,由于炉用燃料的灰分指数比燃油低 7 倍,污染和设备磨损也减少了,而且在十天使用新型储备燃料的过程中,形成的烟尘减少了 2 倍,二氧化硫减少了 70 倍。 结论。因此,实验和计算研究的结果表明,DHO 锅炉燃烧与燃油燃烧相比,在向大气排放、减少腐蚀、停止锅炉维修、降低燃料加热成本以促进运输、降低蒸汽和燃料成本等环境后果方面更有优势。从燃油改用炉用燃料时,由于炉用燃料的灰分含量指数比燃油低 7 倍,污染和设备磨损也会减少,而且在使用新型储备燃料的十天内,烟尘的形成会减少 2 倍,二氧化硫会减少 70 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信