Group ethical voice and ethical behaviors: The mediating role of group moral transitive motivation and moderating role of group faultlines

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Meng Qi, Bin Feng, Fei Liu, Ting Qian
{"title":"Group ethical voice and ethical behaviors: The mediating role of group moral transitive motivation and moderating role of group faultlines","authors":"Meng Qi,&nbsp;Bin Feng,&nbsp;Fei Liu,&nbsp;Ting Qian","doi":"10.1111/beer.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ethical voice involves individuals’ perceptions of what is right and what is wrong. Although prior research has investigated the impacts of individual-level prohibitive ethical expression on personal outcomes, there has been limited examination of ethical voice at the group level. Our study examines how and when different types of ethical voice influence group outcomes. Using data gathered from 363 participants from 61 groups in two Chinese companies, the results reveal that promotive and prohibitive ethical voices at the group level exert opposing influences on group moral transitive motivation. Group moral transitive motivation serves as a mediating factor in the association between the two types of ethical voice and group ethical behaviors (GEB). In addition, group faultlines moderate the impact of promotive ethical voice and prohibitive ethical voice on group moral transitive motivation and on GEB (via group moral transitive motivation). Our study extends the focus of research from a single type of ethical voice at the individual level to multiple types at the group level. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge regarding group ethical voice (GEV) by articulating its mediating mechanism as well as its boundary condition. This research provides valuable insights for researchers and managers by offering a comprehensive understanding about the role of different types of GEV and how to reform GEV.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"34 3","pages":"871-883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethical voice involves individuals’ perceptions of what is right and what is wrong. Although prior research has investigated the impacts of individual-level prohibitive ethical expression on personal outcomes, there has been limited examination of ethical voice at the group level. Our study examines how and when different types of ethical voice influence group outcomes. Using data gathered from 363 participants from 61 groups in two Chinese companies, the results reveal that promotive and prohibitive ethical voices at the group level exert opposing influences on group moral transitive motivation. Group moral transitive motivation serves as a mediating factor in the association between the two types of ethical voice and group ethical behaviors (GEB). In addition, group faultlines moderate the impact of promotive ethical voice and prohibitive ethical voice on group moral transitive motivation and on GEB (via group moral transitive motivation). Our study extends the focus of research from a single type of ethical voice at the individual level to multiple types at the group level. The findings contribute to the body of knowledge regarding group ethical voice (GEV) by articulating its mediating mechanism as well as its boundary condition. This research provides valuable insights for researchers and managers by offering a comprehensive understanding about the role of different types of GEV and how to reform GEV.

群体道德声音与道德行为:群体道德超越动机的中介作用和群体断层的调节作用
道德声音涉及个人对是非对错的看法。尽管之前的研究已经调查了个人层面的禁止性道德表达对个人结果的影响,但对群体层面的道德声音的研究却很有限。我们的研究探讨了不同类型的道德声音如何以及何时对群体结果产生影响。利用从两家中国公司的 61 个小组的 363 名参与者那里收集到的数据,研究结果表明,在群体层面上,促进性和禁止性的道德声音对群体道德传递动机产生了相反的影响。在这两种道德声音与群体道德行为(GEB)的关联中,群体道德直觉动机是一个中介因素。此外,群体断层也会调节促进性伦理声音和禁止性伦理声音对群体道德直觉动机和 GEB(通过群体道德直觉动机)的影响。我们的研究将研究重点从个人层面的单一类型道德声音扩展到了群体层面的多种类型。研究结果阐明了群体道德声音(GEV)的中介机制及其边界条件,为有关群体道德声音的知识体系做出了贡献。通过全面了解不同类型群体道德声音的作用以及如何改革群体道德声音,本研究为研究人员和管理人员提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信