Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the camouflaging autistic traits questionnaire

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1002/aur.3137
Minako Hongo, Fumiyo Oshima, Siqing Guan, Toru Takahashi, Yusuke Nitta, Mikuko Seto, Laura Hull, William Mandy, Toshiyuki Ohtani, Masaki Tamura, Eiji Shimizu
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the camouflaging autistic traits questionnaire","authors":"Minako Hongo,&nbsp;Fumiyo Oshima,&nbsp;Siqing Guan,&nbsp;Toru Takahashi,&nbsp;Yusuke Nitta,&nbsp;Mikuko Seto,&nbsp;Laura Hull,&nbsp;William Mandy,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Ohtani,&nbsp;Masaki Tamura,&nbsp;Eiji Shimizu","doi":"10.1002/aur.3137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the factor structure and determined the reliability and validity of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire–Japanese version (CAT-Q-J) among 204 autistic and 410 non-autistic people. Since a confirmatory factor analysis revealed no factor validity of the CAT-Q-J for both autistic and non-autistic adults, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ensure the psychometric properties matched those of the original scale as much as possible. The results showed the CAT-Q-J comprised three subscales, a four-item compensation subscale, a five-item masking scale, and a five-item assimilation subscale. The overall CAT-Q-J and all three subscales showed sufficient internal consistency and moderate-to-good and stable test–retest reliability in both the autistic and non-autistic samples. Convergent validity was also supported by the correlations found with measures of autistic traits, well-being, anxiety, and depression. Different from the original CAT-Q, compensation/masking for the autistic sample was not correlated with mental health or autistic traits. The reliability and the validity of the overall CAT-Q-J were confirmed; however, caution should be exercised when interpreting its subscales.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 6","pages":"1205-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aur.3137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the factor structure and determined the reliability and validity of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire–Japanese version (CAT-Q-J) among 204 autistic and 410 non-autistic people. Since a confirmatory factor analysis revealed no factor validity of the CAT-Q-J for both autistic and non-autistic adults, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ensure the psychometric properties matched those of the original scale as much as possible. The results showed the CAT-Q-J comprised three subscales, a four-item compensation subscale, a five-item masking scale, and a five-item assimilation subscale. The overall CAT-Q-J and all three subscales showed sufficient internal consistency and moderate-to-good and stable test–retest reliability in both the autistic and non-autistic samples. Convergent validity was also supported by the correlations found with measures of autistic traits, well-being, anxiety, and depression. Different from the original CAT-Q, compensation/masking for the autistic sample was not correlated with mental health or autistic traits. The reliability and the validity of the overall CAT-Q-J were confirmed; however, caution should be exercised when interpreting its subscales.

日语版伪装自闭症特征问卷的可靠性和有效性。
本研究调查了 204 名自闭症患者和 410 名非自闭症患者的自闭症特征伪装问卷-日语版(CAT-Q-J)的因子结构,并确定了其信度和效度。由于确认性因子分析显示 CAT-Q-J 在自闭症和非自闭症成人中都不具有因子有效性,因此进行了探索性因子分析,以确保心理测量特性尽可能与原始量表相匹配。结果显示,CAT-Q-J 包括三个分量表,分别是四个项目的补偿分量表、五个项目的遮蔽分量表和五个项目的同化分量表。无论是在自闭症样本还是非自闭症样本中,CAT-Q-J 和所有三个分量表都显示出足够的内部一致性和中度到良好且稳定的重测可靠性。与自闭症特征、幸福感、焦虑和抑郁的测量结果之间的相关性也证明了其收敛有效性。与最初的 CAT-Q 不同的是,自闭症样本的补偿/掩蔽与心理健康或自闭症特征无关。CAT-Q-J总体的可靠性和有效性得到了证实;但是,在解释其分量表时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信