Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Cross-Sectional Imaging Depiction of Debris Predicts the Success of Endoscopic Drainage Using Lumen Apposing Metal Stents.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhenteng Li, Ali Siddiqui, Gurshawn Singh, Ellen Redstone, Jonathan Weinstein, Donald G Mitchell
{"title":"Pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis: Cross-Sectional Imaging Depiction of Debris Predicts the Success of Endoscopic Drainage Using Lumen Apposing Metal Stents.","authors":"Zhenteng Li, Ali Siddiqui, Gurshawn Singh, Ellen Redstone, Jonathan Weinstein, Donald G Mitchell","doi":"10.1159/000538472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) transmural stent placement for pancreatic walled-off-necrosis (WON) drainage is widespread. This study retrospectively analyzes imaging parameters predicting the outcomes of WON endoscopic drainage using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS).\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe study analyzed data of 115 patients who underwent EUS-guided debridement using LAMS from 2011 to 2015. Pre-intervention CT or MRI were used to analyze WON total volume, percentage of debris, multilocularity, and density. Success measures included technical success, the number of endoscopic sessions, requirement of percutaneous drainage, long-term success, and recurrence.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe primary cause of pancreatitis was gallstones (50.4%), followed by alcohol (27.8%), hypertriglyceridemia (11.3%), idiopathic (8.7%), and autoimmune (1.7%). The mean WON size was 674 mL. All patients underwent endoscopic necrosectomies, averaging 3.1 sessions. Stent placement was successful in 96.5% of cases. Procedural complications were observed in 13 patients (11.3%) and six patients (5.2%) needed additional percutaneous drainage. No patients reported recurrent WON post-treatment. Univariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between debris percentage and the need for additional drainage and long-term success (p <0.001). The number of endoscopic sessions correlated significantly with debris percentage (p < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPreprocedural imaging, particularly debris percentage within WON, significantly predicts the number of endoscopic sessions, the need for further percutaneous drainage, and overall long-term success.","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) transmural stent placement for pancreatic walled-off-necrosis (WON) drainage is widespread. This study retrospectively analyzes imaging parameters predicting the outcomes of WON endoscopic drainage using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS). METHODS The study analyzed data of 115 patients who underwent EUS-guided debridement using LAMS from 2011 to 2015. Pre-intervention CT or MRI were used to analyze WON total volume, percentage of debris, multilocularity, and density. Success measures included technical success, the number of endoscopic sessions, requirement of percutaneous drainage, long-term success, and recurrence. RESULTS The primary cause of pancreatitis was gallstones (50.4%), followed by alcohol (27.8%), hypertriglyceridemia (11.3%), idiopathic (8.7%), and autoimmune (1.7%). The mean WON size was 674 mL. All patients underwent endoscopic necrosectomies, averaging 3.1 sessions. Stent placement was successful in 96.5% of cases. Procedural complications were observed in 13 patients (11.3%) and six patients (5.2%) needed additional percutaneous drainage. No patients reported recurrent WON post-treatment. Univariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between debris percentage and the need for additional drainage and long-term success (p <0.001). The number of endoscopic sessions correlated significantly with debris percentage (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Preprocedural imaging, particularly debris percentage within WON, significantly predicts the number of endoscopic sessions, the need for further percutaneous drainage, and overall long-term success.
胰腺脱壁坏死:横截面成像对碎片的描述可预测使用腔隙贴合金属支架进行内镜引流的成功率
背景内镜超声引导(EUS)经壁支架置入术用于胰腺壁脱落坏死(WON)引流术已得到广泛应用。本研究回顾性分析了预测使用管腔贴壁金属支架(LAMS)进行胰腺壁脱落坏死内镜引流术结果的成像参数。干预前的 CT 或 MRI 用于分析 WON 总体积、碎片百分比、多发性和密度。结果胰腺炎的主要病因是胆结石(50.4%),其次是酒精(27.8%)、高甘油三酯血症(11.3%)、特发性(8.7%)和自身免疫性(1.7%)。WON的平均大小为674毫升。所有患者均接受了内镜下坏死组织切除术,平均手术时间为 3.1 次。96.5%的病例成功植入了支架。13名患者(11.3%)出现了手术并发症,6名患者(5.2%)需要额外的经皮引流。没有患者报告治疗后复发 WON。单变量分析表明,碎片百分比与需要额外引流和长期成功率之间存在显著相关性(P <0.001)。结论预处理成像,尤其是 WON 中碎片的百分比,可显著预测内镜治疗的次数、进一步经皮引流的需求以及总体的长期成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信