Selecting conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: caution regarding the right internal mammary artery

A. Browne, André Lamy
{"title":"Selecting conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: caution regarding the right internal mammary artery","authors":"A. Browne, André Lamy","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2023.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This narrative review summarizes the angiographic and clinical outcome results of the most common coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) conduits. The left internal mammary artery is the preferred first conduit to bypass the left anterior descending artery due to superior long-term survival and graft patency. Recent studies suggest the radial artery may be the preferred second conduit for the circumflex or right coronary artery territories, challenging the belief that the right internal mammary artery is the best choice. Despite their historical high failure rates, saphenous vein grafts continue to be widely used as secondary conduits. Several recent studies report suboptimal rates of right internal mammary artery graft failure, with clinical outcomes comparable to or worse than saphenous veins. The suboptimal rates of RIMA graft failure may be attributed to several factors such as improvements in vein graft failure rates, the use of in situ and non-left anterior descending artery grafting configurations, and skeletonized harvesting techniques. While observational studies favor multiple over single arterial grafting, randomized studies are needed for confirmation. The ongoing Randomized comparison of the clinical Outcome of single vs. Multiple Arterial grafts (ROMA) trial aims to determine if multiple arterial grafting reduces major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality and how secondary conduit selection influences these outcomes. Greater adoption of arterial grafting strategies is likely to come from high-quality evidence of benefit and safety from ongoing and future large pragmatic trials.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This narrative review summarizes the angiographic and clinical outcome results of the most common coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) conduits. The left internal mammary artery is the preferred first conduit to bypass the left anterior descending artery due to superior long-term survival and graft patency. Recent studies suggest the radial artery may be the preferred second conduit for the circumflex or right coronary artery territories, challenging the belief that the right internal mammary artery is the best choice. Despite their historical high failure rates, saphenous vein grafts continue to be widely used as secondary conduits. Several recent studies report suboptimal rates of right internal mammary artery graft failure, with clinical outcomes comparable to or worse than saphenous veins. The suboptimal rates of RIMA graft failure may be attributed to several factors such as improvements in vein graft failure rates, the use of in situ and non-left anterior descending artery grafting configurations, and skeletonized harvesting techniques. While observational studies favor multiple over single arterial grafting, randomized studies are needed for confirmation. The ongoing Randomized comparison of the clinical Outcome of single vs. Multiple Arterial grafts (ROMA) trial aims to determine if multiple arterial grafting reduces major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality and how secondary conduit selection influences these outcomes. Greater adoption of arterial grafting strategies is likely to come from high-quality evidence of benefit and safety from ongoing and future large pragmatic trials.
选择冠状动脉旁路移植的导管:右乳内动脉的注意事项
这篇叙述性综述总结了最常见的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)导管的血管造影和临床结果。左乳内动脉是绕过左前降支动脉的首选第一导管,因为其长期存活率和移植物通畅性都较高。最近的研究表明,桡动脉可能是绕行冠状动脉或右冠状动脉区域的首选第二导管,这对认为右乳内动脉是最佳选择的观点提出了挑战。尽管大隐静脉移植物的失败率历来较高,但仍被广泛用作第二导管。最近的一些研究报告显示,右乳内动脉移植物的失败率并不理想,临床效果与隐静脉相当或更差。右乳内动脉移植失败率低于理想水平可能归因于多个因素,如静脉移植失败率的提高、原位和非左前降支动脉移植配置的使用以及镂空采集技术。虽然观察性研究更倾向于多动脉移植而非单动脉移植,但还需要随机研究来证实。目前正在进行的单动脉移植与多动脉移植临床结果随机比较(ROMA)试验旨在确定多动脉移植是否能减少主要不良心血管事件和死亡率,以及二次导管选择如何影响这些结果。目前和未来的大型实用性试验可能会提供高质量的获益和安全性证据,从而使动脉移植策略得到更广泛的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信