Evaluation and selection of cassava clones and exploitation of genetic covariance across multiple environments

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21251
Vanderlei da Silva Santos, Helcio Duarte Pereira, Guilherme Barbosa Abreu, Carlos Martins Santiago
{"title":"Evaluation and selection of cassava clones and exploitation of genetic covariance across multiple environments","authors":"Vanderlei da Silva Santos,&nbsp;Helcio Duarte Pereira,&nbsp;Guilherme Barbosa Abreu,&nbsp;Carlos Martins Santiago","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clonal evaluation trials of cassava (<i>Manihot esculenta</i> Crantz), where the main selection of this crop takes place, are usually carried out in multiple environments. This study investigated the influence of genotype–environment (GE) interaction on selection and how to explore genetic information across environments in a mixed model approach by modeling different genetic covariance structures. Approximately 240 cassava clones were assessed in an augmented block design during the 2020/2021 growing season in Brazil. The unstructured model was the best suited and used to investigate several strategies of selection. The predicted genetic gains based on individual analyses varied greatly among environments (5.52%–12.62% for root yield; 1.00%–6.09% for dry matter content; and 4.01%–9.42% for dry matter yield), although the clones mean was similar. Moreover, most of the selected clones in each environment outperformed the best check (&gt;80%), except for root yield and dry matter yield in one environment. By multi-environment analysis, greater local gains were detected in each environment (means of 16.87% for root yield, 5.56% for dry matter content, and 17.27% for dry matter yield) and for mean heritability (0.52 for root yield, 0.76 for dry matter content, and 0.55 for dry matter yield). The coincidence of clones selected by individual and multi-environment analyses was 64% for root yield, 73% for dry matter content, and 66% for dry matter yield. The best scenario for selection is when all environments are considered simultaneously, for which regional genetic gains of 16.71% were predicted for root yield, 5.40% for dry matter content, and 17.06% for dry matter yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clonal evaluation trials of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), where the main selection of this crop takes place, are usually carried out in multiple environments. This study investigated the influence of genotype–environment (GE) interaction on selection and how to explore genetic information across environments in a mixed model approach by modeling different genetic covariance structures. Approximately 240 cassava clones were assessed in an augmented block design during the 2020/2021 growing season in Brazil. The unstructured model was the best suited and used to investigate several strategies of selection. The predicted genetic gains based on individual analyses varied greatly among environments (5.52%–12.62% for root yield; 1.00%–6.09% for dry matter content; and 4.01%–9.42% for dry matter yield), although the clones mean was similar. Moreover, most of the selected clones in each environment outperformed the best check (>80%), except for root yield and dry matter yield in one environment. By multi-environment analysis, greater local gains were detected in each environment (means of 16.87% for root yield, 5.56% for dry matter content, and 17.27% for dry matter yield) and for mean heritability (0.52 for root yield, 0.76 for dry matter content, and 0.55 for dry matter yield). The coincidence of clones selected by individual and multi-environment analyses was 64% for root yield, 73% for dry matter content, and 66% for dry matter yield. The best scenario for selection is when all environments are considered simultaneously, for which regional genetic gains of 16.71% were predicted for root yield, 5.40% for dry matter content, and 17.06% for dry matter yield.

评估和选择木薯克隆以及利用多种环境下的遗传协方差
木薯(Manihot esculenta Crantz)的克隆评价试验通常在多种环境中进行,而木薯的主要选育工作就在这些环境中进行。本研究调查了基因型-环境(GE)交互作用对选择的影响,以及如何通过对不同遗传协方差结构建模,以混合模型方法探索跨环境遗传信息。在巴西的 2020/2021 年生长季节,对约 240 个木薯克隆进行了扩增区组设计评估。非结构化模型是最合适的,可用于研究几种选择策略。根据个体分析预测的遗传增益在不同环境下差异很大(根产量为 5.52%-12.62%;干物质含量为 1.00%-6.09%;干物质产量为 4.01%-9.42%),尽管克隆的平均值相似。此外,除一个环境中的根产量和干物质产量外,每个环境中的大多数入选克隆的表现均优于最佳对照(80%)。通过多环境分析,发现各环境的局部增产幅度较大(根产量平均值为 16.87%,干物质含量平均值为 5.56%,干物质产量平均值为 17.27%),平均遗传率也较大(根产量平均值为 0.52,干物质含量平均值为 0.76,干物质产量平均值为 0.55)。通过个体分析和多环境分析选出的克隆的重合率分别为:根产量 64%、干物质含量 73%、干物质产量 66%。选择的最佳方案是同时考虑所有环境,预测根产量的区域遗传增益为 16.71%,干物质含量的区域遗传增益为 5.40%,干物质产量的区域遗传增益为 17.06%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信