Reconstruction of an enigmatic Pennsylvanian cone reveals a relationship to Sphenophyllales

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Michael P. D'Antonio, Carol L. Hotton, Selena Y. Smith, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera
{"title":"Reconstruction of an enigmatic Pennsylvanian cone reveals a relationship to Sphenophyllales","authors":"Michael P. D'Antonio,&nbsp;Carol L. Hotton,&nbsp;Selena Y. Smith,&nbsp;Peter R. Crane,&nbsp;Fabiany Herrera","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>We studied the 3D morphology of a small, well-preserved cone from the Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Lagerstätte to characterize its structure and determine its systematic affinity. Previously tentatively assigned to the enigmatic <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, we show that it differs in key respects from that genus as described.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically compared the new fossil with relevant Paleozoic cone genera and employed advanced imaging techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Airyscan confocal super-resolution microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to visualize and reconstruct the fossil cone in 3D.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analyses demonstrate unequivocally that the sporophylls of the new Mazon Creek cone are arranged in whorls of six and have characters typical of Sphenophyllales, including epidermal cells with undulatory margins and in situ spores assignable to <i>Columinisporites</i>. The combination of characters, including sporophyll arrangement, anatomy, and spore type, supports the establishment of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii</i> gen. et sp. nov. within Sphenophyllales. Furthermore, we show that <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, although originally described as possessing smooth monolete spores, actually possesses <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores, indicating that it, too, was most likely a sphenophyll.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The recognition of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> contributes to our knowledge of Pennsylvanian sphenophyll diversity, and in particular increases the number of species with in situ <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores. Attribution of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> to Sphenophyllales calls into question current interpretations of <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i> suggesting that future research on better-preserved macrofossil material may demonstrate a sphenophyllalean relationship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

We studied the 3D morphology of a small, well-preserved cone from the Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Lagerstätte to characterize its structure and determine its systematic affinity. Previously tentatively assigned to the enigmatic Tetraphyllostrobus, we show that it differs in key respects from that genus as described.

Methods

We systematically compared the new fossil with relevant Paleozoic cone genera and employed advanced imaging techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Airyscan confocal super-resolution microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to visualize and reconstruct the fossil cone in 3D.

Results

The analyses demonstrate unequivocally that the sporophylls of the new Mazon Creek cone are arranged in whorls of six and have characters typical of Sphenophyllales, including epidermal cells with undulatory margins and in situ spores assignable to Columinisporites. The combination of characters, including sporophyll arrangement, anatomy, and spore type, supports the establishment of Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii gen. et sp. nov. within Sphenophyllales. Furthermore, we show that Tetraphyllostrobus, although originally described as possessing smooth monolete spores, actually possesses Columinisporites-type spores, indicating that it, too, was most likely a sphenophyll.

Conclusions

The recognition of Hexaphyllostrobus contributes to our knowledge of Pennsylvanian sphenophyll diversity, and in particular increases the number of species with in situ Columinisporites-type spores. Attribution of Hexaphyllostrobus to Sphenophyllales calls into question current interpretations of Tetraphyllostrobus suggesting that future research on better-preserved macrofossil material may demonstrate a sphenophyllalean relationship.

重建神秘的宾夕法尼亚锥体,揭示其与 Sphenophyllales 的关系
前提 我们研究了来自宾夕法尼亚马宗溪拉格斯塔特的一个保存完好的小型圆锥体的三维形态,以确定其结构特征并确定其系统亲缘关系。此前,我们曾将其暂时归入神秘的 Tetraphyllostrobus 属,但我们发现它在一些关键方面与描述中的该属不同。 方法 我们将新化石与相关的古生代锥体属进行了系统比较,并采用了先进的成像技术,包括扫描电子显微镜、Airyscan 共聚焦超分辨率显微镜、光学显微镜和 X 射线微计算机断层扫描技术,对化石锥体进行了三维可视化和重建。 结果 分析结果清楚地表明,新的马宗河锥体的孢子叶排列成六轮,具有典型的孢子植物特征,包括具有波状边缘的表皮细胞和可归属于Columinisporites的原位孢子。孢子叶排列、解剖和孢子类型等特征的组合支持将 Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii gen.此外,我们还发现 Tetraphyllostrobus 虽然最初被描述为具有光滑的单孢子,但实际上却具有 Columinisporites 型孢子,这表明它也很可能是一种孢子叶植物。 结论 Hexaphyllostrobus的发现有助于我们了解宾夕法尼亚孢粉叶植物的多样性,尤其是增加了具有原位Columinisporites型孢子的物种数量。将Hexaphyllostrobus归入Sphenophyllales类使目前对Tetraphyllostrobus的解释受到质疑,这表明未来对保存较好的大型化石材料的研究可能会证明其与Sphenophyllalean类的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信