A multi-method assessment of emotional processes predicting longitudinal anxiety symptom trajectories in an adolescent clinical sample

Doga Cetinkaya , Sydney A. DeCaro , Margarid R. Turnamian , Jennifer A. Poon , Evan M. Kleiman , Richard T. Liu
{"title":"A multi-method assessment of emotional processes predicting longitudinal anxiety symptom trajectories in an adolescent clinical sample","authors":"Doga Cetinkaya ,&nbsp;Sydney A. DeCaro ,&nbsp;Margarid R. Turnamian ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Poon ,&nbsp;Evan M. Kleiman ,&nbsp;Richard T. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Emotion recognition, reactivity, and regulation are important in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Whether and how these processes differentiate between different trajectories in anxiety remain unclear. The current study examined emotional processes as prospective predictors of anxiety symptom trajectories in psychiatrically hospitalized youth.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants were 180 adolescents (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 14.89; <em>SD</em> = 1.35) from a psychiatric inpatient unit. At index hospitalization, participants completed a behavioral task assessing facial emotion recognition, and self-report measures of emotion dysregulation and reactivity. They completed a self-report measure on anxiety symptoms at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-discharge. Latent growth curve analysis was conducted to identify subgroups of individuals based upon their trajectory of anxiety symptoms across 18-months. ANOVAs were used to examine subgroup differences in emotional processing variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three distinct trajectories were identified, a stable moderate-to-high anxiety group, a group with moderate-to-high anxiety at baseline with symptom improvement over time, and a group characterized by relatively stable low-to-moderate anxiety throughout the study. The two initially moderate-to-high anxiety groups scored higher for emotion dysregulation and emotion reactivity at baseline compared to the low-to-moderate anxiety group. Emotion regulation difficulties relating to emotional non-acceptance were higher for the stable moderate-to-high anxiety group than for the moderate-to-high anxiety group that experience symptom improvement over time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings may have clinical implications for discharge planning. Future studies should explore emotion regulation with a focus on non-acceptance of one’s emotional experiences as a potential target of intervention in individuals with elevated anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000257/pdfft?md5=d9e9e029584e14e32a78632201db6ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S2950004424000257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Emotion recognition, reactivity, and regulation are important in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Whether and how these processes differentiate between different trajectories in anxiety remain unclear. The current study examined emotional processes as prospective predictors of anxiety symptom trajectories in psychiatrically hospitalized youth.

Method

Participants were 180 adolescents (Mage = 14.89; SD = 1.35) from a psychiatric inpatient unit. At index hospitalization, participants completed a behavioral task assessing facial emotion recognition, and self-report measures of emotion dysregulation and reactivity. They completed a self-report measure on anxiety symptoms at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-discharge. Latent growth curve analysis was conducted to identify subgroups of individuals based upon their trajectory of anxiety symptoms across 18-months. ANOVAs were used to examine subgroup differences in emotional processing variables.

Results

Three distinct trajectories were identified, a stable moderate-to-high anxiety group, a group with moderate-to-high anxiety at baseline with symptom improvement over time, and a group characterized by relatively stable low-to-moderate anxiety throughout the study. The two initially moderate-to-high anxiety groups scored higher for emotion dysregulation and emotion reactivity at baseline compared to the low-to-moderate anxiety group. Emotion regulation difficulties relating to emotional non-acceptance were higher for the stable moderate-to-high anxiety group than for the moderate-to-high anxiety group that experience symptom improvement over time.

Conclusions

These findings may have clinical implications for discharge planning. Future studies should explore emotion regulation with a focus on non-acceptance of one’s emotional experiences as a potential target of intervention in individuals with elevated anxiety.

用多种方法评估预测青少年临床样本纵向焦虑症状轨迹的情绪过程
目的情绪识别、反应和调节在焦虑症的发展和维持过程中非常重要。这些过程是否以及如何区分焦虑症的不同轨迹仍不清楚。本研究探讨了作为焦虑症状轨迹前瞻性预测因素的情绪过程在精神病住院青少年中的应用。入院时,参与者完成了一项评估面部情绪识别的行为任务,以及情绪失调和反应性的自我报告测量。他们在基线和出院后 3、6、12 和 18 个月完成了焦虑症状的自我报告测量。通过潜伏增长曲线分析,我们可以根据患者在 18 个月内的焦虑症状轨迹来确定亚组。结果发现了三个不同的轨迹,一个是稳定的中度至高度焦虑组,一个是基线焦虑程度为中度至高度但症状随时间有所改善的组,还有一个是在整个研究过程中焦虑程度相对稳定的中低焦虑组。与中低度焦虑组相比,最初的两个中高度焦虑组在情绪失调和情绪反应方面的基线得分更高。稳定的中度至高度焦虑组在情绪不被接受方面的情绪调节困难要高于随着时间推移症状有所改善的中度至高度焦虑组。未来的研究应探讨情绪调节问题,并将不接受自己的情绪体验作为焦虑症患者的潜在干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信