Medicinal plant extracts interfere in gastric cancer stem cells fluorescence-based assays

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Salyoc Tapia-Rojas , Marlon García-Paitán , Jorge Del Rosario-Chavarri , Alexei Santiani , Santiago Alvarez-Vega , José Amiel-Pérez , Ana Mayanga-Herrera
{"title":"Medicinal plant extracts interfere in gastric cancer stem cells fluorescence-based assays","authors":"Salyoc Tapia-Rojas ,&nbsp;Marlon García-Paitán ,&nbsp;Jorge Del Rosario-Chavarri ,&nbsp;Alexei Santiani ,&nbsp;Santiago Alvarez-Vega ,&nbsp;José Amiel-Pérez ,&nbsp;Ana Mayanga-Herrera","doi":"10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.104000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fluorescence is used in various biological assays due to its high sensitivity, versatility, and precision. In recent years, studies using medicinal plant extracts have increased. However, fluorescence-based assays could be biased by plant metabolites autofluorescence. To address this issue, this study investigated the interference caused by methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of three medicinal plants in three fluorescence-based assays on gastric cancer stem cells(CSC): resazurin reduction, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry. CSC were isolated based on CD44 surface marker, incubated with methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of <em>Buddleja incana, Dracontium spruceanum, Piper aduncum</em>. Resazurin assay evidenced that CSC exposed to extracts and fractions from the three plants showed significant differences in relative fluorescence units (RFU) levels (p &lt; 0.001) compared to the unexposed groups after a 3-hour incubation. In addition, DMSO-treated CSC exposed to extracts and fractions had significantly lower fluorescence levels than living ones, but higher than extracts and fractions without cells. In confocal microscopy, cancer stem cells exposed to extracts and fractions of <em>B. incana</em> and <em>P. aduncum</em> were observed in the same emission spectra of the CSC markers. In flow cytometry, CSC exposed to extracts and fractions without any fluorescent dyes were detected in the double positive quadrants for CSC markers (CD44+/CD133 + ). Among the three plants<em>, D. spruceanum</em> exhibited the least interference. These results show that methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions contain autofluorescent metabolites that interfere with fluorescence-based assays. These results highlight the importance of a prior evaluation for possible fluorescence interference to avoid interpretation biases in fluorescence assays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21540,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X24000780/pdfft?md5=90308c30c804a5095c58b5792ae16de2&pid=1-s2.0-S1319562X24000780-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X24000780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluorescence is used in various biological assays due to its high sensitivity, versatility, and precision. In recent years, studies using medicinal plant extracts have increased. However, fluorescence-based assays could be biased by plant metabolites autofluorescence. To address this issue, this study investigated the interference caused by methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of three medicinal plants in three fluorescence-based assays on gastric cancer stem cells(CSC): resazurin reduction, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry. CSC were isolated based on CD44 surface marker, incubated with methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of Buddleja incana, Dracontium spruceanum, Piper aduncum. Resazurin assay evidenced that CSC exposed to extracts and fractions from the three plants showed significant differences in relative fluorescence units (RFU) levels (p < 0.001) compared to the unexposed groups after a 3-hour incubation. In addition, DMSO-treated CSC exposed to extracts and fractions had significantly lower fluorescence levels than living ones, but higher than extracts and fractions without cells. In confocal microscopy, cancer stem cells exposed to extracts and fractions of B. incana and P. aduncum were observed in the same emission spectra of the CSC markers. In flow cytometry, CSC exposed to extracts and fractions without any fluorescent dyes were detected in the double positive quadrants for CSC markers (CD44+/CD133 + ). Among the three plants, D. spruceanum exhibited the least interference. These results show that methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions contain autofluorescent metabolites that interfere with fluorescence-based assays. These results highlight the importance of a prior evaluation for possible fluorescence interference to avoid interpretation biases in fluorescence assays.

Abstract Image

药用植物提取物干扰基于荧光的胃癌干细胞检测
荧光因其高灵敏度、多功能性和精确性而被广泛应用于各种生物检测中。近年来,使用药用植物提取物进行的研究越来越多。然而,基于荧光的检测可能会受到植物代谢产物自发荧光的影响。为了解决这个问题,本研究调查了三种药用植物的甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分在三种基于荧光的胃癌干细胞(CSC)检测方法中造成的干扰:石杉碱还原法、共聚焦显微镜和流式细胞术。以 CD44 表面标记为基础分离出胃癌干细胞,将其与百部、龙胆草和瓜蒌的甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分培养。雷沙祖林检测结果表明,与未暴露组相比,暴露于这三种植物提取物和馏分的 CSC 在孵育 3 小时后的相对荧光单位(RFU)水平有显著差异(p < 0.001)。此外,经 DMSO 处理的癌细胞干细胞暴露于提取物和馏分后,其荧光水平明显低于活体癌细胞干细胞,但高于未暴露细胞的提取物和馏分。在共聚焦显微镜下,暴露于B. incana和P. aduncum提取物和馏分的癌干细胞可观察到相同的癌干细胞标记物发射光谱。在流式细胞术中,暴露于不含任何荧光染料的提取物和馏分的癌干细胞在癌干细胞标记物(CD44+/CD133 +)的双阳性象限中被检测到。在这三种植物中,D. spruceanum 的干扰最小。这些结果表明,甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分含有自发荧光代谢物,会干扰基于荧光的检测。这些结果突显了事先评估可能的荧光干扰以避免荧光测定中的解释偏差的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
551
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of biological sciences. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences publishes original papers, reviews and short communications on, but not limited to: • Biology, Ecology and Ecosystems, Environmental and Biodiversity • Conservation • Microbiology • Physiology • Genetics and Epidemiology Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences is the official publication of the Saudi Society for Biological Sciences and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信