Arjun Gupta, Christopher J O'Callaghan, Liting Zhu, Derek J Jonker, Ralph P W Wong, Bruce Colwell, Malcolm J Moore, Christos S Karapetis, Niall C Tebbutt, Jeremy D Shapiro, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher M Booth
{"title":"The association of healthcare contact days with physical function and survival in CCTG/AGITG CO.17","authors":"Arjun Gupta, Christopher J O'Callaghan, Liting Zhu, Derek J Jonker, Ralph P W Wong, Bruce Colwell, Malcolm J Moore, Christos S Karapetis, Niall C Tebbutt, Jeremy D Shapiro, Dongsheng Tu, Christopher M Booth","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction While contact days—days with healthcare contact outside home—are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes, and the prognostic ability of contact days. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status, and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival (OS). Results There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day at 4 weeks, 1.50 point decrease; and 8 weeks, 1.06 point decrease, p < .0001 for both), but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab, but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse OS for all comers and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day; all comers, aHR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.05- 1.10; and cetuximab, aHR 1.08, 95%CI 1.05- 1.11, p < .0001 for both). Conclusions In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course was associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all-comers and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction While contact days—days with healthcare contact outside home—are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes, and the prognostic ability of contact days. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status, and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival (OS). Results There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day at 4 weeks, 1.50 point decrease; and 8 weeks, 1.06 point decrease, p < .0001 for both), but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab, but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse OS for all comers and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day; all comers, aHR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.05- 1.10; and cetuximab, aHR 1.08, 95%CI 1.05- 1.11, p < .0001 for both). Conclusions In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course was associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all-comers and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066