Integrating urban household solid waste management with WASH: Implications from case studies of monitoring in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jim Wright, Mawuli Dzodzomenyo, Allan G. Hill, Lorna G. Okotto, Mair L.H. Thomas-Possee , Peter J. Shaw, Joseph Okotto-Okotto
{"title":"Integrating urban household solid waste management with WASH: Implications from case studies of monitoring in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Jim Wright,&nbsp;Mawuli Dzodzomenyo,&nbsp;Allan G. Hill,&nbsp;Lorna G. Okotto,&nbsp;Mair L.H. Thomas-Possee ,&nbsp;Peter J. Shaw,&nbsp;Joseph Okotto-Okotto","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) are commonly grouped for service delivery planning, monitoring and policy, reflecting their many interconnecting impacts, but few studies articulate household-level WASH-solid waste interactions. We aim to assess mismanaged solid waste interactions with WASH that affect urban households and whether integrated waste-WASH indicators can be constructed to monitor these interactions. Via literature review, we identify three trade-offs and seven synergies between WASH and waste management for urban households. Trade-offs arise from consumption of water packaged in bottles or bags and disposable diapers (DDs), whilst synergies include opportunities for households with water services to wash separated waste or cloth diapers. One trade-off (packaged water consumption) has grown rapidly in southeast Asia and West Africa. Household surveys for Ghana and Kenya demonstrate that the urban population lacking waste collection services overlaps strongly with those lacking WASH services. In Kenya, 3.3 million people simultaneously lacked waste collection, hygiene, and basic sanitation services. Finally, we construct indicators from household survey micro-data to measure DD and packaged water consumption in households lacking waste services. Case studies show that from 2012–13 to 2016–17, packaged water consumption grew among Ghanaian households burning or dumping waste, whilst most urban Nigerian households consuming DD lack waste collection services. We conclude that household survey micro-data can be used to construct trade-off measures to inform policy and target services towards populations simultaneously exposed to uncollected waste and lacking WASH services. However, such analyses require an institutional mechanism to coordinate cross-goal monitoring and greater survey data harmonisation. In countries where large populations lack both waste collection and WASH services or with growing DD or packaged water consumption, balanced evidence is needed on DD and packaged water's impacts from both WASH and solid waste management perspectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) are commonly grouped for service delivery planning, monitoring and policy, reflecting their many interconnecting impacts, but few studies articulate household-level WASH-solid waste interactions. We aim to assess mismanaged solid waste interactions with WASH that affect urban households and whether integrated waste-WASH indicators can be constructed to monitor these interactions. Via literature review, we identify three trade-offs and seven synergies between WASH and waste management for urban households. Trade-offs arise from consumption of water packaged in bottles or bags and disposable diapers (DDs), whilst synergies include opportunities for households with water services to wash separated waste or cloth diapers. One trade-off (packaged water consumption) has grown rapidly in southeast Asia and West Africa. Household surveys for Ghana and Kenya demonstrate that the urban population lacking waste collection services overlaps strongly with those lacking WASH services. In Kenya, 3.3 million people simultaneously lacked waste collection, hygiene, and basic sanitation services. Finally, we construct indicators from household survey micro-data to measure DD and packaged water consumption in households lacking waste services. Case studies show that from 2012–13 to 2016–17, packaged water consumption grew among Ghanaian households burning or dumping waste, whilst most urban Nigerian households consuming DD lack waste collection services. We conclude that household survey micro-data can be used to construct trade-off measures to inform policy and target services towards populations simultaneously exposed to uncollected waste and lacking WASH services. However, such analyses require an institutional mechanism to coordinate cross-goal monitoring and greater survey data harmonisation. In countries where large populations lack both waste collection and WASH services or with growing DD or packaged water consumption, balanced evidence is needed on DD and packaged water's impacts from both WASH and solid waste management perspectives.

将城市家庭固体废物管理与讲卫生运动相结合:撒哈拉以南非洲监测案例研究的启示
水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)通常被归类为服务提供规划、监测和政策,反映了它们之间许多相互关联的影响,但很少有研究阐明家庭层面的 WASH 与固体废物之间的相互作用。我们旨在评估固体废物与影响城市家庭的 "讲卫生运动 "之间管理不善的相互作用,以及是否可以构建 "废物-讲卫生运动 "综合指标来监测这些相互作用。通过文献回顾,我们确定了城市家庭在 "讲卫生运动 "和 "废物管理 "之间的三种权衡和七种协同作用。权衡产生于瓶装水或袋装水以及一次性尿布(DDs)的消费,而协同作用则包括为有供水服务的家庭提供清洗分类垃圾或布尿布的机会。在东南亚和西非,一种权衡方式(包装水消费)增长迅速。加纳和肯尼亚的住户调查显示,缺乏垃圾收集服务的城市人口与缺乏讲卫生运动服务的人口高度重叠。在肯尼亚,有 330 万人同时缺乏垃圾收集、个人卫生和基本卫生服务。最后,我们从家庭调查的微观数据中构建了指标,以衡量缺乏垃圾处理服务的家庭的消耗量和包装水消耗量。案例研究显示,从 2012-13 年到 2016-17 年,加纳焚烧或倾倒垃圾的家庭中的包装水消费量有所增长,而尼日利亚城市中大多数消费废水的家庭缺乏垃圾收集服务。我们的结论是,家庭调查微观数据可用于构建权衡措施,为政策提供依据,并为同时面临垃圾无人收集和缺乏讲卫生运动服务的人群提供有针对性的服务。然而,此类分析需要一个制度机制来协调跨目标监测,并加强调查数据的统一性。在一些国家,大量人口既缺乏废物收集服务,也缺乏讲卫生运动服务,或者残疾人士或包装水的消费量不断增加,因此需要从讲卫生运动和固体废物管理的角度平衡残疾人士和包装水的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信