Fitting in or standing out? The organisational socialisation of early career physical education specialism graduates through a micropolitical lens

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cillian Brennan, Richard Bowles, Elaine Murtagh
{"title":"Fitting in or standing out? The organisational socialisation of early career physical education specialism graduates through a micropolitical lens","authors":"Cillian Brennan, Richard Bowles, Elaine Murtagh","doi":"10.1177/1356336x241246182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent emergence of primary school generalist teachers with physical education (PE) expertise has addressed calls for some form of specialisation in primary PE provision in Ireland ( Marron et al., 2018 ). It was hoped that these teachers could advance the quality of PE taught within schools, through their own teaching and by supporting colleagues ( Ní Chróinín, 2018 ). Despite PE specialism graduates (PESGs) developing teaching orientations and high self-efficacy to teach PE during their professional socialisation, it is unclear how their skills are applied within schools. This study examined the organisational socialisation of PESGs through a micropolitical lens, drawing on the research of Kelchtermans and Ballet (2002a , 2002b ). Adopting a critical realist approach enabled us to explore teachers’ complex teaching realities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 graduates of the four-year Bachelor of Education with a major specialism in PE. Reflexive thematic analysis of interview data identified that PESGs had limited opportunities to apply their PE skills due to the conflicting custodial orientations of their schools. Due to PESGs’ professional interests, they were more likely to assimilate with the existing school culture as early career teachers, even if it overlooked their PE expertise. The outsourcing of PE provision to external coaches, and PESGs’ identity as novice teachers, also undermined their potential contribution as PE experts. Although some PESGs have positively used their knowledge to direct whole-school PE provision, more structured opportunities may be necessary to support the continued development of PESGs as teachers and leaders of PE.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x241246182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent emergence of primary school generalist teachers with physical education (PE) expertise has addressed calls for some form of specialisation in primary PE provision in Ireland ( Marron et al., 2018 ). It was hoped that these teachers could advance the quality of PE taught within schools, through their own teaching and by supporting colleagues ( Ní Chróinín, 2018 ). Despite PE specialism graduates (PESGs) developing teaching orientations and high self-efficacy to teach PE during their professional socialisation, it is unclear how their skills are applied within schools. This study examined the organisational socialisation of PESGs through a micropolitical lens, drawing on the research of Kelchtermans and Ballet (2002a , 2002b ). Adopting a critical realist approach enabled us to explore teachers’ complex teaching realities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 graduates of the four-year Bachelor of Education with a major specialism in PE. Reflexive thematic analysis of interview data identified that PESGs had limited opportunities to apply their PE skills due to the conflicting custodial orientations of their schools. Due to PESGs’ professional interests, they were more likely to assimilate with the existing school culture as early career teachers, even if it overlooked their PE expertise. The outsourcing of PE provision to external coaches, and PESGs’ identity as novice teachers, also undermined their potential contribution as PE experts. Although some PESGs have positively used their knowledge to direct whole-school PE provision, more structured opportunities may be necessary to support the continued development of PESGs as teachers and leaders of PE.
融入还是脱颖而出?从微观政治视角看早期职业体育教育专业毕业生的组织社会化
最近,具有体育教育(PE)专业知识的小学全科教师的出现,回应了在爱尔兰小学体育教学中实现某种形式的专业化的呼声(Marron 等人,2018 年)。人们希望这些教师能够通过自己的教学和对同事的支持,提高学校体育教学的质量(Ní Chróinín,2018 年)。尽管体育专业毕业生(PESGs)在职业社会化过程中形成了体育教学的教学方向和较高的自我效能感,但他们的技能如何在学校中应用尚不清楚。本研究借鉴 Kelchtermans 和 Ballet(2002a,2002b)的研究,从微观政治的角度考察了体育教育专业毕业生的组织社会化。采用批判现实主义方法,使我们能够探索教师复杂的教学现实。我们对 11 名体育专业四年制教育学学士毕业生进行了半结构式访谈。对访谈数据进行的反思性专题分析表明,由于学校的管理导向相互冲突,体育教育专业学生应用体育技能的机会有限。由于体育教师的专业兴趣,他们作为职业初期的教师,更有可能融入现有的学校文 化,即使这种文化忽视了他们的体育专长。将体育课外包给外聘教练,以及体育教 师团体作为新手教师的身份,也削弱了他们作为体育专家的潜在贡献。尽管一些体育教师培训小组积极利用他们的知识指导全校的体育教学,但可能还需要更多 的结构化机会,以支持体育教师培训小组继续发展成为体育教师和领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信