Guiding Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping With Structured Decision Making to Inform Complex Natural Resource Management Problems in Waiʻanae Hawaiʻi

Rachael Cleveland, Clay Trauernicht, Leah Bremer, Elizabeth Pickett, Kirsten L. L. Oleson
{"title":"Guiding Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping With Structured Decision Making to Inform Complex Natural Resource Management Problems in Waiʻanae Hawaiʻi","authors":"Rachael Cleveland,&nbsp;Clay Trauernicht,&nbsp;Leah Bremer,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pickett,&nbsp;Kirsten L. L. Oleson","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fire is one example of a larger class of wicked environmental management problems that require community-based management for long-term success. This study aimed to support participatory decision making in a data poor and complex system by using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) within the decision-making framework Structured Decision Making (SDM) to develop a community-based wildfire management plan in partnership with a local group in Wai‘anae Hawaiʻi. SDM is an organized process to create and evaluate decisions that can clarify trade-offs and increase transparency. FCM is a semi-quantitative method to describe system relationships that can handle low data and high uncertainty. We used SDM to define the problem, articulate community concerns related to wildfire, and identify management actions. We then used FCM to model how these actions affected valued ecosystem services and other stakeholder-identified objectives. Modeling results highlighted the trade-offs across three valued ecosystem services from three community-led wildfire management actions. We found that native species outplanting was the most beneficial action to each of the three valued ecosystem services. Through this participatory research, we conclude that the SDM and FCM pairing provided an inclusive and cost-effective way to engage with a specific wildfire management context, and that the process effectively engaged stakeholders while tackling uncertainty. This process also aided consensus-building and group member communication. This pairing can be used to aid community decision-making across diverse management problems as it provides a way to elicit objectives and model trade-offs, even under uncertainty and data limitations, while including stakeholders impacted by such decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire is one example of a larger class of wicked environmental management problems that require community-based management for long-term success. This study aimed to support participatory decision making in a data poor and complex system by using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) within the decision-making framework Structured Decision Making (SDM) to develop a community-based wildfire management plan in partnership with a local group in Wai‘anae Hawaiʻi. SDM is an organized process to create and evaluate decisions that can clarify trade-offs and increase transparency. FCM is a semi-quantitative method to describe system relationships that can handle low data and high uncertainty. We used SDM to define the problem, articulate community concerns related to wildfire, and identify management actions. We then used FCM to model how these actions affected valued ecosystem services and other stakeholder-identified objectives. Modeling results highlighted the trade-offs across three valued ecosystem services from three community-led wildfire management actions. We found that native species outplanting was the most beneficial action to each of the three valued ecosystem services. Through this participatory research, we conclude that the SDM and FCM pairing provided an inclusive and cost-effective way to engage with a specific wildfire management context, and that the process effectively engaged stakeholders while tackling uncertainty. This process also aided consensus-building and group member communication. This pairing can be used to aid community decision-making across diverse management problems as it provides a way to elicit objectives and model trade-offs, even under uncertainty and data limitations, while including stakeholders impacted by such decisions.

Abstract Image

用结构化决策指导模糊认知绘图,为夏威夷怀厄奈岛复杂的自然资源管理问题提供信息
火灾是更多邪恶环境管理问题中的一个例子,这些问题需要以社区为基础的管理才能取得长期成功。本研究旨在通过在决策框架 "结构化决策"(SDM)中使用模糊认知图法(FCM),支持在数据贫乏的复杂系统中进行参与式决策,与夏威夷怀阿奈的一个当地团体合作制定基于社区的野火管理计划。结构化决策是一种有组织的决策创建和评估流程,可以明确权衡取舍,提高透明度。FCM 是一种描述系统关系的半定量方法,可以处理低数据和高不确定性。我们使用 SDM 界定问题,阐明社区对野火的关注,并确定管理行动。然后,我们使用 FCM 对这些行动如何影响有价值的生态系统服务和其他利益相关者确定的目标进行建模。建模结果凸显了三个社区主导的野火管理行动对三种有价值的生态系统服务的权衡。我们发现,本地物种移植是对三种有价值的生态系统服务中的每一种都最有益的行动。通过这项参与式研究,我们得出结论:将 SDM 和 FCM 搭配使用,为参与特定的野火管理提供了一种具有包容性和成本效益的方法,而且该过程在解决不确定性的同时,还有效地吸引了利益相关者的参与。这一过程还有助于建立共识和小组成员之间的交流。这种配对方法可用于帮助社区在各种管理问题上做出决策,因为它提供了一种即使在不确定性和数据限制的情况下也能确定目标和建立权衡模型的方法,同时还包括受此类决策影响的利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信