Isolation of aerobic bacteria from abscesses and wounds in rabbits and antibiotic susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. isolates

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Mareike Schwab , Maria Brockmann , Petra Stumpf , Johannes Pfabe , Elisabeth Müller , Michael Pees , Rachel E. Marschang
{"title":"Isolation of aerobic bacteria from abscesses and wounds in rabbits and antibiotic susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. isolates","authors":"Mareike Schwab ,&nbsp;Maria Brockmann ,&nbsp;Petra Stumpf ,&nbsp;Johannes Pfabe ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Müller ,&nbsp;Michael Pees ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Marschang","doi":"10.1053/j.jepm.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wound infections and abscesses in rabbits are a common problem in veterinary practice and their treatment can be challenging. Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are important tools in these cases. While some studies are available on bacteria associated with wound infections and abscesses in rabbits, the numbers of animals included is generally limited. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in clinical practice is also an important part of good antibiotic stewardship. Multiple antibiotic resistances are frequently encountered in <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., 2 groups of bacteria commonly associated with abscesses in rabbits.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the results of aerobic bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests in swabs from abscesses (A) (n = 541) and from skin and wounds (SW) (n = 308) submitted to a commercial diagnostic laboratory. Samples submitted between January 2017 and October 2020 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was evaluated and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In A, 465 bacterial isolates including 35 different species were isolated while 394 bacterial isolates, including 35 different species, were found in SW. The most frequently isolated bacteria were <em>Staphylococcus</em> spp. (A = 21.7%, SW = 36.5%) followed by <em>Pasteurella</em> spp. in A (13.3%) and aerobic spore-forming bacteria in SW (11.2%). <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was the third most commonly isolated genus in both sample types (A = 11.6%, SW = 8.9%). <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> isolated from A were more often resistant to the tested antibiotics than other <em>Pseudomonas</em> species. These results support the need for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in small mammal practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557506324000399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Wound infections and abscesses in rabbits are a common problem in veterinary practice and their treatment can be challenging. Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are important tools in these cases. While some studies are available on bacteria associated with wound infections and abscesses in rabbits, the numbers of animals included is generally limited. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in clinical practice is also an important part of good antibiotic stewardship. Multiple antibiotic resistances are frequently encountered in Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp., 2 groups of bacteria commonly associated with abscesses in rabbits.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated the results of aerobic bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests in swabs from abscesses (A) (n = 541) and from skin and wounds (SW) (n = 308) submitted to a commercial diagnostic laboratory. Samples submitted between January 2017 and October 2020 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp. was evaluated and compared.

Results

In A, 465 bacterial isolates including 35 different species were isolated while 394 bacterial isolates, including 35 different species, were found in SW. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. (A = 21.7%, SW = 36.5%) followed by Pasteurella spp. in A (13.3%) and aerobic spore-forming bacteria in SW (11.2%). Pseudomonas spp. was the third most commonly isolated genus in both sample types (A = 11.6%, SW = 8.9%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from A were more often resistant to the tested antibiotics than other Pseudomonas species. These results support the need for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in small mammal practice.

从兔子的脓肿和伤口中分离需氧细菌,并对分离出的葡萄球菌属和假单胞菌属进行抗生素敏感性测试
背景兔子的伤口感染和脓肿是兽医实践中的常见问题,其治疗可能具有挑战性。细菌培养和抗菌药敏感性测试是治疗这些病例的重要工具。虽然目前已有一些关于兔子伤口感染和脓肿相关细菌的研究,但涉及的动物数量普遍有限。监测临床实践中的抗生素耐药性也是良好抗生素管理的重要组成部分。方法这项回顾性研究评估了提交给商业诊断实验室的脓肿(A)拭子(n = 541)和皮肤与伤口(SW)拭子(n = 308)中需氧细菌培养和抗生素药敏试验的结果。研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月期间提交的样本。对葡萄球菌和假单胞菌属的抗菌药敏感性测试进行了评估和比较。结果在 A 中分离出 465 株细菌,包括 35 个不同的菌种,而在 SW 中分离出 394 株细菌,包括 35 个不同的菌种。最常分离到的细菌是葡萄球菌属(A = 21.7%,SW = 36.5%),其次是巴氏杆菌属(A = 13.3%)和需氧孢子形成菌(SW = 11.2%)。假单胞菌属是两种样本类型中第三大最常见的分离菌属(A = 11.6%,SW = 8.9%)。与其他假单胞菌相比,从 A 样本中分离出的铜绿假单胞菌更常对测试的抗生素产生耐药性。这些结果支持了在小型哺乳动物饲养中进行细菌培养和抗生素药敏试验的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine
Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine provides clinicians with a convenient, comprehensive, "must have" resource to enhance and elevate their expertise with exotic pet medicine. Each issue contains wide ranging peer-reviewed articles that cover many of the current and novel topics important to clinicians caring for exotic pets. Diagnostic challenges, consensus articles and selected review articles are also included to help keep veterinarians up to date on issues affecting their practice. In addition, the Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine serves as the official publication of both the Association of Exotic Mammal Veterinarians (AEMV) and the European Association of Avian Veterinarians (EAAV). The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine is the most complete resource for practitioners who treat exotic pets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信