Evaluating climate change adaptation options in the agriculture sector: A PROMETHEE-GAIA analysis

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tahereh Zobeidi , Masoud Yazdanpanah , Nadejda Komendantova , Katharina Löhr , Stefan Sieber
{"title":"Evaluating climate change adaptation options in the agriculture sector: A PROMETHEE-GAIA analysis","authors":"Tahereh Zobeidi ,&nbsp;Masoud Yazdanpanah ,&nbsp;Nadejda Komendantova ,&nbsp;Katharina Löhr ,&nbsp;Stefan Sieber","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mitigating maladaptation and effectively managing climate risks are crucial components of strategic planning in agriculture amidst climate change. Evaluation serves as a pivotal element in this process, facilitating the identification of effective adaptation strategies tailored to local contexts. Consequently, it's imperative to thoroughly evaluate these strategies to ensure their success and resilience. The current study evaluated adaptation methods tailored to the local context in southwest Iran across three categories-crop, farm, and water management-employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and the PROMETHEE-GAIA. Sensitivity analysis was performed during the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) stage to confirm the criteria weights and in the PROMETHEE to confirm the ranking. A set of eight criteria, including effectiveness/importance, affordability, institutional feasibility, technical feasibility, social feasibility, traditional acceptance, flexibility, and environment side effects (positive) were applied to evaluate the adaptation measures. Our results indicated the three highest rankings in each set of measures, as follows: i) crop management—relay intercropping, change of crop type, and mixed intercropping; ii) farm management—pest and disease management, weed control, and crop rotation; iii) water management—lining water canals or covering their earth floors with nylon, using pipes rather than open canals to transfer water to the field, and increasing the time intervals between irrigations to deal with water shortages. The outcomes underscore the urgency of formulating region-specific adaptation policies that align with local expertise and contextual needs. By prioritizing the identified effective strategies, policymakers can enhance resilience against water scarcity in southwest Iran. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation and adaptation, emphasizing the dynamic nature of climate challenges and the need for continuous refinement of adaptive policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000631/pdfft?md5=a05c01a2f5e1a431b356ed904cec3a45&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724000631-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitigating maladaptation and effectively managing climate risks are crucial components of strategic planning in agriculture amidst climate change. Evaluation serves as a pivotal element in this process, facilitating the identification of effective adaptation strategies tailored to local contexts. Consequently, it's imperative to thoroughly evaluate these strategies to ensure their success and resilience. The current study evaluated adaptation methods tailored to the local context in southwest Iran across three categories-crop, farm, and water management-employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and the PROMETHEE-GAIA. Sensitivity analysis was performed during the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) stage to confirm the criteria weights and in the PROMETHEE to confirm the ranking. A set of eight criteria, including effectiveness/importance, affordability, institutional feasibility, technical feasibility, social feasibility, traditional acceptance, flexibility, and environment side effects (positive) were applied to evaluate the adaptation measures. Our results indicated the three highest rankings in each set of measures, as follows: i) crop management—relay intercropping, change of crop type, and mixed intercropping; ii) farm management—pest and disease management, weed control, and crop rotation; iii) water management—lining water canals or covering their earth floors with nylon, using pipes rather than open canals to transfer water to the field, and increasing the time intervals between irrigations to deal with water shortages. The outcomes underscore the urgency of formulating region-specific adaptation policies that align with local expertise and contextual needs. By prioritizing the identified effective strategies, policymakers can enhance resilience against water scarcity in southwest Iran. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of ongoing evaluation and adaptation, emphasizing the dynamic nature of climate challenges and the need for continuous refinement of adaptive policies.

评估农业部门的气候变化适应方案:PROMETHEE-GAIA 分析
减轻适应不良和有效管理气候风险是气候变化中农业战略规划的重要组成部分。评估是这一过程中的关键因素,有助于确定适合当地情况的有效适应战略。因此,必须对这些战略进行全面评估,以确保其成功和复原力。本研究采用多重标准决策(MCDM)和 PROMETHEE-GAIA 评估了伊朗西南部三类适应方法(作物、农场和水资源管理)。在 AHP(层次分析法)阶段进行了敏感性分析,以确认标准权重,并在 PROMETHEE 中进行了敏感性分析,以确认排序。评估适应措施时采用了一套八项标准,包括有效性/重要性、可负担性、制度可行性、技术可行性、社会可行性、传统接受度、灵活性和环境副作用(正面)。结果显示,每组措施中排名最高的三项如下:i) 作物管理--间作套种、改变作物类型和混合间作;ii) 农田管理--病虫害管理、杂草控制和轮作;iii) 水资源管理--衬砌水渠或用尼龙覆盖土层、使用管道而非明渠向田间输水,以及延长灌溉间隔时间以应对缺水问题。这些成果突出表明,当务之急是根据当地的专业知识和实际需求,制定针对具体地区的适应政策。通过优先考虑已确定的有效战略,决策者可以提高伊朗西南部地区应对水资源短缺的能力。此外,该研究还强调了持续评估和适应的重要性,强调了气候挑战的动态性质以及不断完善适应政策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信