Outdoor air pollution as a risk factor for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2: A nationwide test-negative case-control study in the Netherlands

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mariana Simões , Jelle Zorn , Lenny Hogerwerf , Guus J.M. Velders , Lützen Portengen , Miriam Gerlofs-Nijland , Marieke Dijkema , Maciek Strak , José Jacobs , Joost Wesseling , Wilco J. de Vries , Suzanne Mijnen-Visser , Lidwien A.M. Smit , Roel Vermeulen , Lapo Mughini-Gras
{"title":"Outdoor air pollution as a risk factor for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2: A nationwide test-negative case-control study in the Netherlands","authors":"Mariana Simões ,&nbsp;Jelle Zorn ,&nbsp;Lenny Hogerwerf ,&nbsp;Guus J.M. Velders ,&nbsp;Lützen Portengen ,&nbsp;Miriam Gerlofs-Nijland ,&nbsp;Marieke Dijkema ,&nbsp;Maciek Strak ,&nbsp;José Jacobs ,&nbsp;Joost Wesseling ,&nbsp;Wilco J. de Vries ,&nbsp;Suzanne Mijnen-Visser ,&nbsp;Lidwien A.M. Smit ,&nbsp;Roel Vermeulen ,&nbsp;Lapo Mughini-Gras","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air pollution is a known risk factor for several diseases, but the extent to which it influences COVID-19 compared to other respiratory diseases remains unclear. We performed a test-negative case-control study among people with COVID-19-compatible symptoms who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, to assess whether their long- and short-term exposure to ambient air pollution (AAP) was associated with testing positive (<em>vs</em>. negative) for SARS-CoV-2. We used individual-level data for all adult residents in the Netherlands who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between June and November 2020, when only symptomatic people were tested, and modeled ambient concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> at geocoded residential addresses. In long-term exposure analysis, we selected individuals who did not change residential address in 2017–2019 (1.7 million tests) and considered the average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and NO<sub>2</sub> in that period, and different sources of PM (industry, livestock, other agricultural activities, road traffic, other Dutch sources, foreign sources). In short-term exposure analysis, individuals not changing residential address in the two weeks before testing day (2.7 million tests) were included in the analyses, thus considering 1- and 2-week average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> before testing day as exposure. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis with adjustment for several confounders, including municipality and testing week to account for spatiotemporal variation in viral circulation, was used. Overall, there was no statistically significant effect of long-term exposure to the studied pollutants on the odds of testing positive <em>vs</em>. negative for SARS-CoV-2. However, significant positive associations of long-term exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 from specifically foreign and livestock sources, and to PM10 from other agricultural sources, were observed. Short-term exposure to PM10 (adjusting for NO<sub>2</sub>) and PM2.5 were also positively associated with increased odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. While these exposures seemed to increase COVID-19 risk relative to other respiratory diseases, the underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. This study reinforces the need to continue to strive for better air quality to support public health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 114382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924000634/pdfft?md5=6e178ea0c6f623b6b93cfe4259c67ee8&pid=1-s2.0-S1438463924000634-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924000634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air pollution is a known risk factor for several diseases, but the extent to which it influences COVID-19 compared to other respiratory diseases remains unclear. We performed a test-negative case-control study among people with COVID-19-compatible symptoms who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, to assess whether their long- and short-term exposure to ambient air pollution (AAP) was associated with testing positive (vs. negative) for SARS-CoV-2. We used individual-level data for all adult residents in the Netherlands who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between June and November 2020, when only symptomatic people were tested, and modeled ambient concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and O3 at geocoded residential addresses. In long-term exposure analysis, we selected individuals who did not change residential address in 2017–2019 (1.7 million tests) and considered the average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and NO2 in that period, and different sources of PM (industry, livestock, other agricultural activities, road traffic, other Dutch sources, foreign sources). In short-term exposure analysis, individuals not changing residential address in the two weeks before testing day (2.7 million tests) were included in the analyses, thus considering 1- and 2-week average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and O3 before testing day as exposure. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis with adjustment for several confounders, including municipality and testing week to account for spatiotemporal variation in viral circulation, was used. Overall, there was no statistically significant effect of long-term exposure to the studied pollutants on the odds of testing positive vs. negative for SARS-CoV-2. However, significant positive associations of long-term exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 from specifically foreign and livestock sources, and to PM10 from other agricultural sources, were observed. Short-term exposure to PM10 (adjusting for NO2) and PM2.5 were also positively associated with increased odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. While these exposures seemed to increase COVID-19 risk relative to other respiratory diseases, the underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. This study reinforces the need to continue to strive for better air quality to support public health.

Abstract Image

室外空气污染是 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的风险因素:荷兰全国性检测阴性病例对照研究
空气污染是多种疾病的已知风险因素,但与其他呼吸道疾病相比,空气污染对 COVID-19 的影响程度仍不清楚。我们对有 COVID-19 症状并接受了 SARS-CoV-2 感染检测的人进行了一项检测阴性病例对照研究,以评估他们长期和短期暴露于环境空气污染(AAP)是否与 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性(与阴性)有关。我们使用了 2020 年 6 月至 11 月期间荷兰所有接受过 SARS-CoV-2 检测的成年居民的个人数据(当时只对有症状的人进行了检测),并对地理编码住宅地址的 PM10、PM2.5、NO2 和 O3 环境浓度进行了建模。在长期暴露分析中,我们选取了 2017-2019 年未更换居住地址的个人(170 万次检测),并考虑了该期间 PM10、PM2.5 和 NO2 的平均浓度,以及 PM 的不同来源(工业、畜牧业、其他农业活动、道路交通、其他荷兰来源、国外来源)。在短期暴露分析中,将检测日前两周内未更换居住地址的个人(270 万次检测)纳入分析范围,因此将检测日前一周和两周的 PM10、PM2.5、NO2 和 O3 平均浓度作为暴露量。采用混合效应逻辑回归分析,并对若干混杂因素(包括城市和检测周)进行调整,以考虑病毒循环的时空变化。总体而言,长期接触所研究的污染物对 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性与阴性的几率没有明显的统计学影响。不过,长期暴露于国外和畜牧业污染源的 PM10 和 PM2.5 以及其他农业污染源的 PM10 会产生明显的正相关关系。短期接触 PM10(调整二氧化氮)和 PM2.5 也与 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的几率增加呈正相关。与其他呼吸道疾病相比,这些暴露似乎增加了 COVID-19 的风险,但其潜在的生物机制仍不清楚。这项研究加强了继续努力改善空气质量以支持公众健康的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信