Tight resource-rational analysis

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Cvetomir M. Dimov , John R. Anderson , Shawn A. Betts
{"title":"Tight resource-rational analysis","authors":"Cvetomir M. Dimov ,&nbsp;John R. Anderson ,&nbsp;Shawn A. Betts","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resource-rational analysis is used to develop models that assume that people behave optimally given the structure of the task environment and the cost of cognitive operations. We argue in favor of a tight resource-rational analysis, an extension in which model parameters are independently constrained. As a case in point, we demonstrate how to develop a tight resource-rational model of the video game Space Track. Our approach consists of four steps. First, we measure performance-critical parameters in independent micro-tasks, which we input into mathematical models of cognitive processes. Second, we validate these models in other process-specific micro-tasks. Third, we rely on a theory of the cognitive architecture (i.e., ACT-R) to derive estimates of the time costs of these processes. Finally, we generate predictions for the main task, Space Track, by assuming that subjects are doing their best given their abilities. The generated individualized predictions were close to observed subject asymptotic performance, which demonstrated the viability of our approach, even in tasks of similar complexity to that of Space Track.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724000330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resource-rational analysis is used to develop models that assume that people behave optimally given the structure of the task environment and the cost of cognitive operations. We argue in favor of a tight resource-rational analysis, an extension in which model parameters are independently constrained. As a case in point, we demonstrate how to develop a tight resource-rational model of the video game Space Track. Our approach consists of four steps. First, we measure performance-critical parameters in independent micro-tasks, which we input into mathematical models of cognitive processes. Second, we validate these models in other process-specific micro-tasks. Third, we rely on a theory of the cognitive architecture (i.e., ACT-R) to derive estimates of the time costs of these processes. Finally, we generate predictions for the main task, Space Track, by assuming that subjects are doing their best given their abilities. The generated individualized predictions were close to observed subject asymptotic performance, which demonstrated the viability of our approach, even in tasks of similar complexity to that of Space Track.

严密的资源合理性分析
资源--理性分析用于建立模型,假定在任务环境结构和认知操作成本的条件下,人们的行为是最优的。我们主张采用严密的资源-理性分析,即对模型参数进行独立约束的扩展。我们以视频游戏《太空轨道》为例,演示了如何建立一个严密的资源合理模型。我们的方法包括四个步骤。首先,我们测量独立微观任务中的性能关键参数,并将其输入认知过程数学模型。其次,我们在其他特定流程的微观任务中验证这些模型。第三,我们依靠认知结构理论(即 ACT-R)来估算这些过程的时间成本。最后,我们假定受试者在能力范围内尽全力完成主要任务 "空间追踪",从而得出预测结果。生成的个性化预测结果与观察到的受试者渐进表现非常接近,这证明了我们的方法是可行的,即使在复杂程度与《太空轨道》类似的任务中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信