Cvetomir M. Dimov , John R. Anderson , Shawn A. Betts
{"title":"Tight resource-rational analysis","authors":"Cvetomir M. Dimov , John R. Anderson , Shawn A. Betts","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resource-rational analysis is used to develop models that assume that people behave optimally given the structure of the task environment and the cost of cognitive operations. We argue in favor of a tight resource-rational analysis, an extension in which model parameters are independently constrained. As a case in point, we demonstrate how to develop a tight resource-rational model of the video game Space Track. Our approach consists of four steps. First, we measure performance-critical parameters in independent micro-tasks, which we input into mathematical models of cognitive processes. Second, we validate these models in other process-specific micro-tasks. Third, we rely on a theory of the cognitive architecture (i.e., ACT-R) to derive estimates of the time costs of these processes. Finally, we generate predictions for the main task, Space Track, by assuming that subjects are doing their best given their abilities. The generated individualized predictions were close to observed subject asymptotic performance, which demonstrated the viability of our approach, even in tasks of similar complexity to that of Space Track.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041724000330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resource-rational analysis is used to develop models that assume that people behave optimally given the structure of the task environment and the cost of cognitive operations. We argue in favor of a tight resource-rational analysis, an extension in which model parameters are independently constrained. As a case in point, we demonstrate how to develop a tight resource-rational model of the video game Space Track. Our approach consists of four steps. First, we measure performance-critical parameters in independent micro-tasks, which we input into mathematical models of cognitive processes. Second, we validate these models in other process-specific micro-tasks. Third, we rely on a theory of the cognitive architecture (i.e., ACT-R) to derive estimates of the time costs of these processes. Finally, we generate predictions for the main task, Space Track, by assuming that subjects are doing their best given their abilities. The generated individualized predictions were close to observed subject asymptotic performance, which demonstrated the viability of our approach, even in tasks of similar complexity to that of Space Track.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial.
The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition.
Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.