Comparison of Three Viral Nucleic Acid Preamplification Pipelines for Sewage Viral Metagenomics

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xavier Fernandez-Cassi, Tamar Kohn
{"title":"Comparison of Three Viral Nucleic Acid\n Preamplification Pipelines for Sewage Viral Metagenomics","authors":"Xavier Fernandez-Cassi,&nbsp;Tamar Kohn","doi":"10.1007/s12560-024-09594-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Viral metagenomics is a useful tool for detecting multiple human viruses in\n urban sewage. However, more refined protocols are required for its effective use in\n disease surveillance. In this study, we investigated the performance of three different\n preamplification pipelines (specific to RNA viruses, DNA viruses or both) for viral\n genome sequencing using spiked-in Phosphate Buffered Saline and sewage samples\n containing known concentrations of viruses. We found that compared to the pipeline\n targeting all genome types, the RNA pipeline performed better in detecting RNA viruses\n in both spiked and unspiked sewage samples, allowing the detection of various mammalian\n viruses including members from the <i>Reoviridae</i>,\n <i>Picornaviridae</i>, <i>Astroviridae</i> and <i>Caliciviridae</i>.\n However, the DNA-specific pipeline did not improve the detection of mammalian DNA\n viruses. We also measured viral recovery by quantitative reverse transcription\n polymerase chain reaction and assessed the impact of genetic background (non-viral\n genetic material) on viral coverage. Our results indicate that viral recoveries were\n generally lower in sewage (average of 11.0%) and higher in Phosphate Buffered Saline\n (average of 23.4%) for most viruses. Additionally, spiked-in viruses showed lower genome\n coverage in sewage, demonstrating the negative effect of genetic background on\n sequencing. Finally, correlation analysis revealed a relationship between virus\n concentration and genome normalized reads per million, indicating that viral metagenomic\n sequencing can be semiquantitative.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"16 3","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12560-024-09594-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-024-09594-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viral metagenomics is a useful tool for detecting multiple human viruses in urban sewage. However, more refined protocols are required for its effective use in disease surveillance. In this study, we investigated the performance of three different preamplification pipelines (specific to RNA viruses, DNA viruses or both) for viral genome sequencing using spiked-in Phosphate Buffered Saline and sewage samples containing known concentrations of viruses. We found that compared to the pipeline targeting all genome types, the RNA pipeline performed better in detecting RNA viruses in both spiked and unspiked sewage samples, allowing the detection of various mammalian viruses including members from the Reoviridae, Picornaviridae, Astroviridae and Caliciviridae. However, the DNA-specific pipeline did not improve the detection of mammalian DNA viruses. We also measured viral recovery by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and assessed the impact of genetic background (non-viral genetic material) on viral coverage. Our results indicate that viral recoveries were generally lower in sewage (average of 11.0%) and higher in Phosphate Buffered Saline (average of 23.4%) for most viruses. Additionally, spiked-in viruses showed lower genome coverage in sewage, demonstrating the negative effect of genetic background on sequencing. Finally, correlation analysis revealed a relationship between virus concentration and genome normalized reads per million, indicating that viral metagenomic sequencing can be semiquantitative.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

污水病毒元基因组学中三种病毒核酸前置扩增管道的比较
病毒元基因组学是检测城市污水中多种人类病毒的有用工具。然而,要将其有效地用于疾病监测,还需要更精细的方案。在这项研究中,我们使用加标磷酸盐缓冲盐水和含有已知浓度病毒的污水样本,研究了三种不同前置扩增管道(分别针对 RNA 病毒、DNA 病毒或两者)在病毒基因组测序中的性能。我们发现,与针对所有基因组类型的管道相比,RNA 管道在检测加标和未加标污水样本中的 RNA 病毒方面表现更好,可以检测到各种哺乳动物病毒,包括 Reoviridae、Picornaviridae、Astroviridae 和 Caliciviridae 的成员。然而,DNA 特异性管道并没有提高对哺乳动物 DNA 病毒的检测能力。我们还通过定量反转录聚合酶链反应测量了病毒回收率,并评估了遗传背景(非病毒遗传物质)对病毒覆盖率的影响。结果表明,对于大多数病毒来说,污水中的病毒回收率普遍较低(平均为 11.0%),而磷酸盐缓冲盐水中的病毒回收率较高(平均为 23.4%)。此外,加标病毒在污水中的基因组覆盖率较低,这表明遗传背景对测序有负面影响。最后,相关分析表明,病毒浓度与基因组每百万归一化读数之间存在关系,这表明病毒元基因组测序可以是半定量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Environmental Virology
Food and Environmental Virology ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信