Regulatory interactions between daptomycin‐ and bacitracin‐responsive pathways coordinate the cell envelope antibiotic resistance response of Enterococcus faecalis

IF 2.6 2区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Sali M. Morris, Laura Wiens, Olivia Rose, Georg Fritz, Tim Rogers, Susanne Gebhard
{"title":"Regulatory interactions between daptomycin‐ and bacitracin‐responsive pathways coordinate the cell envelope antibiotic resistance response of Enterococcus faecalis","authors":"Sali M. Morris, Laura Wiens, Olivia Rose, Georg Fritz, Tim Rogers, Susanne Gebhard","doi":"10.1111/mmi.15264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enterococcal infections frequently show high levels of antibiotic resistance, including to cell envelope‐acting antibiotics like daptomycin (DAP). While we have a good understanding of the resistance mechanisms, less is known about the control of such resistance genes in enterococci. Previous work unveiled a bacitracin resistance network, comprised of the sensory ABC transporter SapAB, the two‐component system (TCS) SapRS and the resistance ABC transporter RapAB. Interestingly, components of this system have recently been implicated in DAP resistance, a role usually regulated by the TCS LiaFSR. To better understand the regulation of DAP resistance and how this relates to mutations observed in DAP‐resistant clinical isolates of enterococci, we here explored the interplay between these two regulatory pathways. Our results show that SapR regulates an additional resistance operon, <jats:italic>dltXABCD</jats:italic>, a known DAP resistance determinant, and show that LiaFSR regulates the expression of <jats:italic>sapRS</jats:italic>. This regulatory structure places SapRS‐target genes under dual control, where expression is directly controlled by SapRS, which itself is up‐regulated through LiaFSR. The network structure described here shows how <jats:italic>Enterococcus faecalis</jats:italic> coordinates its response to cell envelope attack and can explain why clinical DAP resistance often emerges via mutations in regulatory components.","PeriodicalId":19006,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Microbiology","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.15264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enterococcal infections frequently show high levels of antibiotic resistance, including to cell envelope‐acting antibiotics like daptomycin (DAP). While we have a good understanding of the resistance mechanisms, less is known about the control of such resistance genes in enterococci. Previous work unveiled a bacitracin resistance network, comprised of the sensory ABC transporter SapAB, the two‐component system (TCS) SapRS and the resistance ABC transporter RapAB. Interestingly, components of this system have recently been implicated in DAP resistance, a role usually regulated by the TCS LiaFSR. To better understand the regulation of DAP resistance and how this relates to mutations observed in DAP‐resistant clinical isolates of enterococci, we here explored the interplay between these two regulatory pathways. Our results show that SapR regulates an additional resistance operon, dltXABCD, a known DAP resistance determinant, and show that LiaFSR regulates the expression of sapRS. This regulatory structure places SapRS‐target genes under dual control, where expression is directly controlled by SapRS, which itself is up‐regulated through LiaFSR. The network structure described here shows how Enterococcus faecalis coordinates its response to cell envelope attack and can explain why clinical DAP resistance often emerges via mutations in regulatory components.
达托霉素和杆菌肽反应途径之间的调控相互作用协调了粪肠球菌的细胞膜抗生素耐药性反应
肠球菌感染经常表现出高水平的抗生素耐药性,包括对达托霉素(DAP)等细胞包膜作用抗生素的耐药性。虽然我们对耐药机制有了很好的了解,但对肠球菌中此类耐药基因的控制却知之甚少。以前的工作揭示了一个由感性 ABC 转运体 SapAB、双组分系统(TCS)SapRS 和抗性 ABC 转运体 RapAB 组成的杆菌肽抗性网络。有趣的是,这一系统的组分最近与 DAP 抗性有关,而这一作用通常由 TCS LiaFSR 调节。为了更好地了解 DAP 耐药性的调控以及这与在耐 DAP 肠球菌临床分离株中观察到的突变之间的关系,我们在此探讨了这两种调控途径之间的相互作用。我们的研究结果表明,SapR 可调控另一个抗性操作子 dltXABCD(已知的 DAP 抗性决定子),并表明 LiaFSR 可调控 sapRS 的表达。这种调控结构将 SapRS 靶基因置于双重控制之下,其表达直接受 SapRS 控制,而 SapRS 本身则通过 LiaFSR 上调。这里描述的网络结构显示了粪肠球菌如何协调其对细胞包膜攻击的反应,并能解释为什么临床上的 DAP 耐药性往往是通过调控元件的突变产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Microbiology
Molecular Microbiology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
132
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Microbiology, the leading primary journal in the microbial sciences, publishes molecular studies of Bacteria, Archaea, eukaryotic microorganisms, and their viruses. Research papers should lead to a deeper understanding of the molecular principles underlying basic physiological processes or mechanisms. Appropriate topics include gene expression and regulation, pathogenicity and virulence, physiology and metabolism, synthesis of macromolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, polysaccharides, etc), cell biology and subcellular organization, membrane biogenesis and function, traffic and transport, cell-cell communication and signalling pathways, evolution and gene transfer. Articles focused on host responses (cellular or immunological) to pathogens or on microbial ecology should be directed to our sister journals Cellular Microbiology and Environmental Microbiology, respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信