Space interferometer imaging limitations due to Global Positioning System uncertainties and parasitic forces in Low Earth Orbit

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Leonid Pogorelyuk, Mason Black, Nicholas Belsten, Eleonora Polini, Jonah T. Hansen, Michael Ireland, John D. Monnier, Kerri Cahoy
{"title":"Space interferometer imaging limitations due to Global Positioning System uncertainties and parasitic forces in Low Earth Orbit","authors":"Leonid Pogorelyuk, Mason Black, Nicholas Belsten, Eleonora Polini, Jonah T. Hansen, Michael Ireland, John D. Monnier, Kerri Cahoy","doi":"10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Space interferometers could, in principle, exploit the relatively stable space environment and ease of baseline reconfiguration to collect measurements beyond the limitations of ground-based interferometers. In particular, a two-element interferometer could provide excellent uv-plane coverage over a few tens of low Earth orbits. One of the challenges for free-flying interferometers is controlling the optical path distance with subwavelength accuracies despite the collectors flying up to hundreds of meters apart. We consider two approaches: an artificial in-orbit laser guide star (LGS) that provides a phase reference for the space interferometer and fringe tracking on the science target itself. The two approaches (LGS versus no LGS) would require different image processing techniques. In this work, we explore image processing with LGS phase residuals due to global positioning system (GPS) uncertainties. We use GPS uncertainties from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On mission to simulate image retrieval with a 300-m baseline laser-guided space interferometer. This is done by fitting the slowly varying phase errors of complex visibility measurements. We also consider a 40-m baseline interferometer with visibility(-modulus)-only measurements. In this case, we simulate the bias in visibility due to fringe tracking in the presence of parasitic forces acting on the spacecraft. We then use a modified version of the hybrid input–output phase retrieval algorithm for image reconstruction. We conclude that under our optimistic assumptions, both approaches could enable general imaging of a few large stars even with CubeSats, although an LGS would significantly improve the best resolution obtainable.","PeriodicalId":54342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Space interferometers could, in principle, exploit the relatively stable space environment and ease of baseline reconfiguration to collect measurements beyond the limitations of ground-based interferometers. In particular, a two-element interferometer could provide excellent uv-plane coverage over a few tens of low Earth orbits. One of the challenges for free-flying interferometers is controlling the optical path distance with subwavelength accuracies despite the collectors flying up to hundreds of meters apart. We consider two approaches: an artificial in-orbit laser guide star (LGS) that provides a phase reference for the space interferometer and fringe tracking on the science target itself. The two approaches (LGS versus no LGS) would require different image processing techniques. In this work, we explore image processing with LGS phase residuals due to global positioning system (GPS) uncertainties. We use GPS uncertainties from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On mission to simulate image retrieval with a 300-m baseline laser-guided space interferometer. This is done by fitting the slowly varying phase errors of complex visibility measurements. We also consider a 40-m baseline interferometer with visibility(-modulus)-only measurements. In this case, we simulate the bias in visibility due to fringe tracking in the presence of parasitic forces acting on the spacecraft. We then use a modified version of the hybrid input–output phase retrieval algorithm for image reconstruction. We conclude that under our optimistic assumptions, both approaches could enable general imaging of a few large stars even with CubeSats, although an LGS would significantly improve the best resolution obtainable.
低地轨道上全球定位系统的不确定性和寄生力造成的空间干涉仪成像限制
空间干涉仪原则上可以利用相对稳定的空间环境和基线重新配置的便利性,收集超出地面干涉仪限制的测量数据。特别是,双元素干涉仪可以在几十个低地球轨道上提供出色的紫外平面覆盖。自由飞行干涉仪面临的挑战之一是,尽管收集器相距数百米,但仍要以亚波长精度控制光路距离。我们考虑了两种方法:一种是为空间干涉仪提供相位参考的人工在轨激光导引星(LGS),另一种是对科学目标本身进行条纹跟踪。这两种方法(LGS 与无 LGS)需要不同的图像处理技术。在这项工作中,我们探讨了因全球定位系统(GPS)不确定性而产生的 LGS 相位残差的图像处理问题。我们利用重力恢复和气候实验后续任务的全球定位系统不确定性来模拟使用 300 米基线激光制导空间干涉仪的图像检索。这是通过拟合复杂能见度测量中缓慢变化的相位误差来实现的。我们还考虑了仅测量能见度(-模数)的 40 米基线干涉仪。在这种情况下,我们模拟了在航天器上存在寄生力的情况下,由于条纹跟踪而导致的能见度偏差。然后,我们使用改进版的混合输入输出相位检索算法进行图像重建。我们的结论是,在我们乐观的假设下,这两种方法都能实现对几颗大恒星的一般成像,即使是立方体卫星,尽管 LGS 会显著提高可获得的最佳分辨率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems publishes peer-reviewed papers reporting on original research in the development, testing, and application of telescopes, instrumentation, techniques, and systems for ground- and space-based astronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信