C.L. Faithfull , E. Tamarit , P. Nordling , E. Kraft
{"title":"Restoring charophytes is still a challenge: A call for developing successful methods","authors":"C.L. Faithfull , E. Tamarit , P. Nordling , E. Kraft","doi":"10.1016/j.aquabot.2024.103777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Submerged aquatic vegetation, and especially charophytes, which are an important habitat for many species, have declined in the Baltic Sea due to changes in light climate, eutrophication and physical disturbance. Physical disturbance in the form of small-scale dredging activities is commonplace in Sweden due to land uplift, but causes fragmentation of coastal habitats. Here we test three planting methods for restoration of the charophyte <em>Chara aspera</em> on an area of deposited sediment, and a single method for restoration of <em>C. tomentosa</em> in a dredged area. We found that none of the planting methods tested was more successful than natural recolonization of <em>C. aspera</em> on the deposited sediment. <em>C. tomentosa</em> planting was unsuccessful in the dredged area and was likely outcompeted for light by taller species. The <em>C. aspera</em> meadow was resilient to smaller disturbances, as experimental removal of up to 2.5% of <em>C. aspera</em> and sediment from the donor area did not reduce <em>C. aspera</em> coverage a month after removal. Even after an uncontrolled event that removed up to 50% of <em>C. aspera</em> in the experimental plots, <em>C. aspera</em> coverage had returned to pre-removal levels a year after the disturbance. We suggest future restoration experiments test transplanting sediment rich in oocytes and bulbils into areas with suitable light climates and low competition with other species. Restoration efforts are costly and highly uncertain of success, therefore we recommend discontinuing dredging activities in charophyte meadows to protect this important habitat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8273,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Botany","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 103777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299/pdfft?md5=3ec451913b33b8d1f48ab929a41314b9&pid=1-s2.0-S0304377024000299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304377024000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Submerged aquatic vegetation, and especially charophytes, which are an important habitat for many species, have declined in the Baltic Sea due to changes in light climate, eutrophication and physical disturbance. Physical disturbance in the form of small-scale dredging activities is commonplace in Sweden due to land uplift, but causes fragmentation of coastal habitats. Here we test three planting methods for restoration of the charophyte Chara aspera on an area of deposited sediment, and a single method for restoration of C. tomentosa in a dredged area. We found that none of the planting methods tested was more successful than natural recolonization of C. aspera on the deposited sediment. C. tomentosa planting was unsuccessful in the dredged area and was likely outcompeted for light by taller species. The C. aspera meadow was resilient to smaller disturbances, as experimental removal of up to 2.5% of C. aspera and sediment from the donor area did not reduce C. aspera coverage a month after removal. Even after an uncontrolled event that removed up to 50% of C. aspera in the experimental plots, C. aspera coverage had returned to pre-removal levels a year after the disturbance. We suggest future restoration experiments test transplanting sediment rich in oocytes and bulbils into areas with suitable light climates and low competition with other species. Restoration efforts are costly and highly uncertain of success, therefore we recommend discontinuing dredging activities in charophyte meadows to protect this important habitat.
期刊介绍:
Aquatic Botany offers a platform for papers relevant to a broad international readership on fundamental and applied aspects of marine and freshwater macroscopic plants in a context of ecology or environmental biology. This includes molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects of macroscopic aquatic plants as well as the classification, structure, function, dynamics and ecological interactions in plant-dominated aquatic communities and ecosystems. It is an outlet for papers dealing with research on the consequences of disturbance and stressors (e.g. environmental fluctuations and climate change, pollution, grazing and pathogens), use and management of aquatic plants (plant production and decomposition, commercial harvest, plant control) and the conservation of aquatic plant communities (breeding, transplantation and restoration). Specialized publications on certain rare taxa or papers on aquatic macroscopic plants from under-represented regions in the world can also find their place, subject to editor evaluation. Studies on fungi or microalgae will remain outside the scope of Aquatic Botany.