Consequence relations and data science: From Galois mappings to data interpretation

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Marcin Wolski , Anna Gomolińska
{"title":"Consequence relations and data science: From Galois mappings to data interpretation","authors":"Marcin Wolski ,&nbsp;Anna Gomolińska","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concepts of a consequence relation and operation, though very abstract and theoretical, may be related to specific categories of information systems (i.e. mathematical <em>frontends</em> of data tables); as it has been demonstrated by D. Vakarelov, there exist correspondence between Pawlak information systems and Scott as well as Tarski consequence operations. This line of research goes (via <em>representation</em>) from abstract concepts to data. In this paper we would like to take the opposite direction: from data (via <em>construction</em>) to consequence relations. The main emphasis is laid here not on general categories of consequence relations (e.g. Scott or Tarski ones) but on concrete operators that can be retrieved from information systems (e.g. different examples of Scott consequence). To this end, we employ Galois connections and adjunctions (<em>en masse</em> called Galois mappings) and study the consequence relations that can be built <em>via</em> these maps. The main novelty of our research comes from the investigation of consequence relations induced by adjunctions rather than monotone Galois connections, which have been the main subject of studies so far. Surprisingly, the operations obtained from adjunctions possess a number of counter-intuitive properties, which (in turn) request some intelligible interpretations. And this is our next objective: to make sense of these consequence relations in the context of information processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 109203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X24000902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concepts of a consequence relation and operation, though very abstract and theoretical, may be related to specific categories of information systems (i.e. mathematical frontends of data tables); as it has been demonstrated by D. Vakarelov, there exist correspondence between Pawlak information systems and Scott as well as Tarski consequence operations. This line of research goes (via representation) from abstract concepts to data. In this paper we would like to take the opposite direction: from data (via construction) to consequence relations. The main emphasis is laid here not on general categories of consequence relations (e.g. Scott or Tarski ones) but on concrete operators that can be retrieved from information systems (e.g. different examples of Scott consequence). To this end, we employ Galois connections and adjunctions (en masse called Galois mappings) and study the consequence relations that can be built via these maps. The main novelty of our research comes from the investigation of consequence relations induced by adjunctions rather than monotone Galois connections, which have been the main subject of studies so far. Surprisingly, the operations obtained from adjunctions possess a number of counter-intuitive properties, which (in turn) request some intelligible interpretations. And this is our next objective: to make sense of these consequence relations in the context of information processing.

后果关系与数据科学:从伽罗瓦映射到数据解释
结果关系和运算的概念虽然非常抽象和理论化,但可能与特定类别的信息系统(即数据表的数学前端)有关;正如 D. Vakarelov 所证明的,Pawlak 信息系统与 Scott 以及 Tarski 结果运算之间存在对应关系。这一研究方向(通过表示法)从抽象概念到数据。在本文中,我们希望采取相反的方向:从数据(通过构造)到结果关系。本文的重点不是后果关系的一般类别(如斯科特或塔尔斯基后果关系),而是可以从信息系统中检索到的具体运算符(如斯科特后果的不同示例)。为此,我们采用了伽罗瓦连接和邻接(统称为伽罗瓦映射),并研究了通过这些映射可以建立的后果关系。我们研究的主要新颖性来自于对由邻接而非单调伽罗瓦连接诱导的后果关系的研究,而单调伽罗瓦连接是迄今为止研究的主要对象。令人惊奇的是,由邻接得到的运算具有一些反直觉的性质,而这些性质(反过来)又要求一些可理解的解释。这就是我们的下一个目标:在信息处理的背景下理解这些结果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信