Valuing and integrating soil roles in assessing the capital dimension of soil security: An Australian case study

Nicolas Francos, Alex B. McBratney, Damien J. Field, Budiman Minasny, Julio C. Pachon, José Padarian, Anilkumar Hunakunti, Wartini Ng, Sandra J. Evangelista, Thomas O'Donoghue
{"title":"Valuing and integrating soil roles in assessing the capital dimension of soil security: An Australian case study","authors":"Nicolas Francos,&nbsp;Alex B. McBratney,&nbsp;Damien J. Field,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny,&nbsp;Julio C. Pachon,&nbsp;José Padarian,&nbsp;Anilkumar Hunakunti,&nbsp;Wartini Ng,&nbsp;Sandra J. Evangelista,&nbsp;Thomas O'Donoghue","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The crucial role of soil in global food production and its multifaceted contributions to ecosystem services underscore the need for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This study presents a novel approach to soil evaluation by integrating the assessment of soil functions, services, and threats into a unified metric which quantifies the capital dimension which is termed \"soil management capital\". To achieve this, we focused on three key roles: a threat, evaluated by the pH regulation costs, factoring in different buffering capacities and liming/sulphuring treatments to attain an optimal reference pH, a function, representing soil's role as a reservoir and regulator of nutrients; and a service, considering available water holding capacity (AWC) for water security. Integrating these activities culminates in a soil capital metric, providing a comprehensive understanding of the soil's economic value in US$/ha units on a pixel-by-pixel basis across Australia. To achieve this, we analysed spatial information from the Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA) with Google Earth Engine (GEE). Our study generated detailed maps illustrating pH regulation costs, OC, nutrients (N, P, K), and AWC across Australia. The integration of these roles revealed regions of large soil capital in the Australian eastern coast and Tasmania.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000157/pdfft?md5=356d26aa6c3b080150ebec3ae03622d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000157-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The crucial role of soil in global food production and its multifaceted contributions to ecosystem services underscore the need for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This study presents a novel approach to soil evaluation by integrating the assessment of soil functions, services, and threats into a unified metric which quantifies the capital dimension which is termed "soil management capital". To achieve this, we focused on three key roles: a threat, evaluated by the pH regulation costs, factoring in different buffering capacities and liming/sulphuring treatments to attain an optimal reference pH, a function, representing soil's role as a reservoir and regulator of nutrients; and a service, considering available water holding capacity (AWC) for water security. Integrating these activities culminates in a soil capital metric, providing a comprehensive understanding of the soil's economic value in US$/ha units on a pixel-by-pixel basis across Australia. To achieve this, we analysed spatial information from the Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA) with Google Earth Engine (GEE). Our study generated detailed maps illustrating pH regulation costs, OC, nutrients (N, P, K), and AWC across Australia. The integration of these roles revealed regions of large soil capital in the Australian eastern coast and Tasmania.

在评估土壤安全的资本层面时重视和整合土壤的作用:澳大利亚案例研究
土壤在全球粮食生产中的关键作用及其对生态系统服务的多方面贡献凸显了建立综合评估框架的必要性。本研究提出了一种新颖的土壤评估方法,将土壤功能、服务和威胁的评估整合到一个统一的指标中,对资本维度(即 "土壤管理资本")进行量化。为此,我们将重点放在三个关键作用上:一个是威胁,由 pH 值调节成本评估,考虑到不同的缓冲能力和限制/硫化处理,以达到最佳参考 pH 值;一个是功能,代表土壤作为养分储存和调节器的作用;一个是服务,考虑到可用的持水能力(AWC),以保障水资源。将这些活动整合在一起,最终就形成了土壤资本度量标准,从而全面了解澳大利亚各地以像素为单位、以美元/公顷为单位的土壤经济价值。为此,我们利用谷歌地球引擎(GEE)分析了澳大利亚土壤和景观网格(SLGA)的空间信息。我们的研究生成了详细的地图,说明了澳大利亚各地的 pH 值调节成本、OC、养分(氮、磷、钾)和 AWC。这些作用的整合揭示了澳大利亚东部沿海和塔斯马尼亚的大型土壤资本区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信